Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism/Archive 16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hero Hasan

 Not done. No vandalism, simply self-promotion-only user. No activity after you warned him, all the spam is deleted. Let's try at first without block. Taivo (talk) 09:41, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

62.46.216.59

User: 62.46.216.59 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism.

jdx Re: 03:24, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: Blocked for 1 day, not static. --Achim55 (talk) 07:02, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

VladimirBoys

User: VladimirBoys (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
User: 180.195.208.145 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism-only account. jdx Re: 02:23, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Both are reverted and blocked. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Neocon1

User: Neocon1 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism-only account, already blocked on a few other projects.

jdx Re: 00:51, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked by AntiCompositeNumber a couple minutes before you posted, and since glocked. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:17, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

172.58.224.0/19

User: 172.58.224.0/19 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Range used by globally banned user Rgalo10 for trolling/disruptive editing. A long softblock suggested.

jdx Re: 01:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done for one year. Yann (talk) 14:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Artnets

User: Artnets (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: All his uploads were either copyvio or no permission. Let's indeff him so he doesn't upload more.

Contributers2020Talk to me here 15:26, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Warned. Yann (talk) 14:00, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Shame_on_The_One_That_Got_Away_GMA

User: Shame_on_The_One_That_Got_Away_GMA (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism-only account and cross-wiki abuse. Uploaded images for cross wiki vandalism use. See also global contribs.

SCP-2000 18:36, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Already globally locked. Yann (talk) 13:59, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Naresh kumar sawariya khatik

✓ Done Already warned. This image could have educational uses. Yann (talk) 13:58, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

188.162.254.152

User: 188.162.254.152 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism with lots of edits..

Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:30, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

This is urgent !!! - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:36, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done by Krd. Yann (talk) 13:55, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

113.210.106.52

✓ Done anon only block for one week MorganKevinJ(talk) 03:42, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
@Morgankevinj: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:50, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

223.177.138.145

✓ Done: 3 months, open proxy or compromised server, blacklisted on several DNSBLs. --Achim55 (talk) 07:54, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
@Achim: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:50, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Rifal Sharma

✓ Done. I blocked him for a week. Edits are reverted. Taivo (talk) 11:55, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:51, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

131.242.30.121

User: 131.242.30.121 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: racist text added to several files, some would even justify a revdel to hide them.

Denniss (talk) 12:49, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the Nazi racist IP for a week. Thanks for reverting! Now I will hide some revisions. Taivo (talk) 14:08, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Awesomus

 Not done. No activity after you warned Awesomus. Taivo (talk) 16:59, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Marium Alberto

User: Marium Alberto (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Using image with copyrights as new version. Alex Pereiradisc 19:35, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. The version is hidden. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

2A01:4C8:C24:65F1:DD74:94B5:DBAA:F3D4

User: 2A01:4C8:C24:65F1:DD74:94B5:DBAA:F3D4 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: vandalism at VP Stang★ 14:58, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Blocked for a week, all edits are hidden. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

65.246.72.92

User: 65.246.72.92 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Globally banned user Rgalo10. jdx Re: 23:06, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Let's start with week-long block. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Merajul Islam.Meraj

✓ Done. Herbythyme blocked the user indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 14:08, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
@Herbythyme and Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:30, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

63.143.0.0/16

User: 63.143.0.0/16 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
User: 65.246.0.0/16 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Ranges used for trolling by globally banned user Rgalo10. Please block at least access to User talk:Achim55, User talk:Pandakekok9 and User talk:Jdx. jdx Re: 18:49, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

@Jdx: see also m:srg#Global block for ranges used for Foundation Global Ban evasion by Rgalo10.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:37, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
I blocked both IP ranges for a week, but did not revert anything. Taivo (talk) 20:13, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
I semi-protected Pandakekok's talkpage for a year and reverted some vandalism. Jdx's talkpage is already semi-protected until December, do you want longer semi-protection? Taivo (talk) 20:20, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
No, thanks. I forgot that I asked for semi-protection two weeks ago. --jdx Re: 21:31, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo: A note regarding the block – these ranges are from New York City so IMO there may be a lot of collateral damage if full hardblock is applied. That's why I asked for a partial block. A softblock also seems to be OK. --jdx Re: 21:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
I agree. That's why my blocks are not full hardblocks. Taivo (talk) 08:14, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

151.43.45.52

User: 151.43.45.52 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: structure data removal Stang★ 22:13, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. 3 days block. Thanks for reverting! Taivo (talk) 08:08, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

174.197.144.251

User: 174.197.144.251 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Insult at User talk:Rgalo10 Stang★ 02:12, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

I recommend partially block 174.197.128.0/18 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  editing User Talk namespace. SCP-2000 05:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. I blocked the IP from User, User talk and Commons namespaces. Taivo (talk) 08:09, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

102.182.199.113

User: 102.182.199.113 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism. Cross-wiki abuse. SCP-2000 04:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. 3 days block. Taivo (talk) 08:12, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Pitzzaboy

User: Pitzzaboy (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Uploading numerous images without mentioning the real source, pretending that they are personal work. For instance, uploading weather radar and satellite images that only national weather services can be the author of. He has been notified numerous times. Could now use a warning from Administrators.

Pierre cb (talk) 14:49, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for a month (2nd block). Yann (talk) 15:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
@Pierre cb and Yann: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Vanth9

User: Vanth9 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: clearly a vandalism only account, see user contributions Neko-chan (talk) 03:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I would not block Vanth indefinitely, if not the comments on his/her talkpage ... Taivo (talk) 11:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

HarrisDerkins22

User: HarrisDerkins22 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Also some IP addresses that are clearly the same person. I originally made a report at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:HarrisDerkins22 because it wasn't initially obviously vandalism, but this is becoming more and more blatant. I'd still like to see at least one other admin overtly agree that this should be treated as vandalism (or disagree with me, in which case I'll back off) rather than be left to act on my own. I was certainly unhappy with these as edits to photos I've uploaded, and reverted those, but a lot of other people's photos are clearly also affected. Jmabel ! talk 04:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I warned Harris and blocked two IP-s. Taivo (talk) 12:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

27.131.209.70

User: 27.131.209.70 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: persistent vandalism, inserting inappropriate captions.

Hasley 05:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the IP for a week. Thanks for reverting vandalism! Taivo (talk) 11:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

97.117.68.4

User: 97.117.68.4 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: persistent vandalism, personal attacks in captions. Bridget (talk) 05:25, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the IP for a week and semi-protected the target file for a month. Taivo (talk) 08:10, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Нікк лузер, шавка, шваль

User: Нікк лузер, шавка, шваль (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Harassment

Gyrostat (talk) 01:03, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

User:Cukrakalnis. Flags of Kiev voivodeship

User:Cukrakalnis places the following files of the flags of the Kiev Voivodeship

in Category: Fictional flags of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. At the same time, the description of the files contains a Polish historical heraldic source: Kasper Niesiecki Herbarz Polski. Tom 1, 1839.

Additionally, there is a separate file File:Herbarz Polski Kaspra Niesieckiego Tom 1 - Województwo kijowskie.png, where the description is given. The same description in the form of text in Polish:

Województwo Kijowskie, że się pomieścić może z starostwem swojem jużem namienił wyżej. Za herb nosi anioła bialego w czerwonem polu. Paproc. o herb. f.718. Gvagnin w Kronice Ruskiej fol. 24, powiada że chorągiew jego zielona o dwu rogach, w polu czerwonem, z jednej strony pogonią Litewską, z drugiej strony Niedźwiedziem czarnym, w polu białym naznaczona, atoli co się tycze pogoni pomylił się Gvagnin. Bielski fol. 9. krom anioła z jednej strony chorągwi, który w jednej ręce miecz goły, nadoł końcem spuszczony, w drugiej pochwy trzyma: na drugiej stronie, przywlaszcza mu Niedźwiedzia w bialem polu, u którego noga lewa przednia trochę do góry podniesiona.

My literary translation:

Kiev Voivodeship. Previously, a white angel in a red field was depicted on the coat of arms. Paprocki gives a description of Guagnini in the Chronicle... (A Description of Sarmatian Europe): the Voivodeship had a green banner with two horns. On one side of the banner, the Lithuanian coat of arms Pahonia is depicted in a red field (shield), on the other side, a black bear is depicted in a white field (shield). But Bielski believes that Guagnini was mistaken and says that on one side of the banner there was a punishing winged angel, with a drawn sword lowered down in one hand and holding a scabbard in the other hand. On the other side of the banner there was a Bear walking in a white field (shield) with his left front leg slightly raised.

Similar information in the source Geografia historyczna - Województwo Kijowskie.

Smaller territories also had similar flags (Powiat). Example: flag of Grodno powiat.

Please stop vandalism. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 19:12, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

The issue here is that Лобачев Владимир invented flags. The description he gives does not match the flag. In the description, there is no mention of a various forms, e.g. yellow circle, with "Kijowska" in the center and there is no mention of Ioannes Casimirus, which is still shown on File:Flag of Kiev Voivodeship (1569-1793).svg. Лобачев Владимир created some flags with conjecture and added his own things, i.e. Wikipedia:WP:OR, and wants to label them as historical. The necessary disclaimers that they are fictional should be placed.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:21, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

In the above examples, we see that the name of the king on the banner, as well as the name of the horogvi by the name of the voivodeship or powiat, were common practice. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 19:39, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Лобачев Владимир takes two flags from the late-16th century (one of them refixed in the mid-18th century) and establishes a supposed trend on them. In addition, it is incorrect to establish such a trend when there was no known standardisation of flags. Лобачев Владимир proceeded to imaginatively use two different flags (with different shapes, forms, details, etc.) as a sort of template for other flags, without any basis in Wikipedia:WP:RS or elsewhere to ground them in reality. The flags Лобачев Владимир created are fictional by definition. If Лобачев Владимир had just made the flags File:Troki, Pahonia. Трокі, Пагоня (XVI).jpg and File:Słonim, Pahonia. Слонім, Пагоня (1747).jpg into SVG versions, then it would have been OK, no problem, because it would have a clear basis in reality. The flags of the Kiev Voivodeship, however, are not a comparable situation.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Here is the banner of the military unit of the army of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, and another banner of the 17th century of the military unit of the army of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 20:32, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
The shape of the banner with two horns is described in the source. And earlier there were rectangular banners. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 20:34, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Here is a rectangular banner of the Mazovian Voivodeship from the 16th century. https://pl.pinterest.com/pin/63894888442841755/ Chorągiew województwa mazowieckiego XVIw.] --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 10:04, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
  • First of all, Wikimedia Commons has its own policies and guidelines, so the persistent referring the English Wikipedia ones by Cukrakalnis is irrelevant. The most relevant local policy is Commons:Project scope/Neutral point of view, that states: It is not the role of Commons to adjudicate on subject-matter disputes nor to force local projects to use one version of a file in preference to another. Provided that a file falls within Commons scope, and can be legally hosted, we make it available. Whether and under what conditions it is actually used is a matter for the local communities of the individual projects to decide. Moreover, user Cukrakalnis is known as a disruptive one, who obviously doesn't understand Commons:Project scope. This user usually STARTS and fights many edit wars mostly with removing the categories connected to Belarus and Belarusians (denying history of Belarusians), that is a clear manifestation of chauvinistic national discriminations of Belarusians. If this project still has any real administrators (not just "file removers"), they should stop persistent attempts by this user of disrupting the users, who really contributes to the project understanding the aim of Wikimedia Commons.
The "banner of the military unit of the army of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth" is a false statement because the page has no such caption. Лобачев Владимир linked to a random petition that translates to "Dismissal of Właszczykowski as the head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for treason of Poland". Using such a thing as this is baseless. As for and the "banner of the 17th century of the military unit of the army of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth", that is also an incorrect statement, and the Facebook post itself says that it is a Каралеўская харугва, i.e. a Royal Banner, which is not a military unit flag like Лобачев Владимир says it is. Лобачев Владимир's flags are mostly based on conjecture and should be labelled as fictional and not historical.
My actions concerning Belarus is just removing categories that do not belong there. That is not a denial of history. To prove that this is not out of the ordinary, no one places Category:History of Poland into Category:German Empire or Category:Russian Empire, regardless of the territorial overlap and other things. It's not "chauvinistic national discriminations of Belarusians" when improperly-placed categories are removed/deleted, like Category:Coats of arms of Belarus in the Imperial Russian Army. Belarus did not even exist at the time, so how can there be a coat of arms of a state that did not exist, even as an idea? A parallel would be to have a Category:Coats of arms of Singapore in the British army in e.g. 19th century, even if the Coat of arms of Singapore only appeared in the 20th century. Belarus as a country only appeared in 1918, as multiple sources will tell you, including Encyclopedia Britannica. It is nonsense to claim that such an esteemed source would be chauvinistic. So, the problem is not a denial of history on my part, but the misplacement of many categories on the part of others. In fact, removing categories that do not belong in certain places is precisely educational.
My actions do not contradict Commons:Project scope/Neutral point of view, because I am not deleting the files. I am moving them to the appropriate category, i.e. fictional, instead of historical, in this case. In other cases, I move other files to other categories. Commons depends on accurate categorization to be useful. Looking at Commons:Project scope, it is actually my actions that are educational because placing ahistorical flags as historical is precisely counter-educational. Moreover, Kazimier Lachnovič is making absurd claims of me being "disruptive", despite the fact the vast majority of my actions are beneficial and many are concerned with off-loading overburdened categories. Just in the past few days I have categorized several hundreds of files from Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany into various new categories I created: Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Anhalt, Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Baden, Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Nassau, Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Nürnberg, Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Westphalia, Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Reuss, Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Saxe-Meiningen, Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach, in addition to putting many files into the already existing categories. In fact, Wikimedia Commons should stop the persistent attempts of Kazimier Lachnovič against effective and accurate categorization.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 09:48, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

194.214.51.118

User: 194.214.51.118 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: page vandalism despite warnings.

Hasley 15:58, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for a week by Natuur12. --jdx Re: 05:19, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Masumansa1

User: Masumansa1 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism in progress (after warnings). jdx Re: 05:18, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked him/her for a week and deleted more self-promotion. Taivo (talk) 08:21, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Mohin Talukdar

User: Mohin Talukdar (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Repeatedly adding their name or other nonsense as captions/descriptions/depicts in unrelated files. Clump (talk) 22:20, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Last warning sent. Should be blocked if behavior continues. @Clump: You should inform any user if you report them here. I did it for you this time. Thanks, Yann (talk) 22:46, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

113.181.113.123

User: 113.181.113.123 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: German: Der Benutzer macht den redirect von Dateien unbrauchbar File:EuroRussia.svg und File:Flag of China.svg. Als IP kann ich das nicht wieder herstellen. Die redirect sind vielfach in Verwendung. Bitte die redirect wieder herstellen. Danke 2003:DE:708:435B:40D9:D684:4C6:6B9F 09:39, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Danke für den Hinweis & podziękowania dla Michała. --Achim55 (talk) 16:30, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

千村斛免

User: 千村斛免 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Openly admitted to being w:zh:LTA:QCHM.

SHB2000 (talk) 05:08, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Also vandalism-only account and cross-wiki abuse. SCP-2000 08:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done Yann (talk) 09:04, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Cundtischarge

User: Cundtischarge (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: This is a long-term vandal from English Wikipedia known as Architect 134 (sock puppetry archive). He specializes in porn-themed trolling. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:00, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the user indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

DominicReymysterio619

User: DominicReymysterio619 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism-only account. jdx Re: 02:55, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked him indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

2405:4802:15e:ea40:f9f2:548c:c4b4:4596

User: 2405:4802:15e:ea40:f9f2:548c:c4b4:4596 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: "Musée Annam" is vandalising again, most of his edits are good so please don't undo them or delete any new categories without good reason to do so, just asking for a block as he keeps leaving insults on my user talk page (as is customary once I find his socks and tag him, despite the fact I am usually the one defending his edits...). Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:43, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

@Donald Trung Please consider asking for semi-protection of User talk:Donald Trung at COM:ANB.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:52, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. I blocked the user and reverted 1 edit. If you want to semi-protect your user talkpage, just ask. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
I don't see any use for protecting "my" talk page as hes'#s not that frequent and if he can't vandalise here he'll go to another wiki where I don't have Rollback privileges so it would (ironically) cost me more to undo their edits, plus if an IP editor would want to message me I don't feel like they should be filtered out because of one (1) annoying bad actor. This section is resolved and generally they hop IP ranges so I don't suspect a block to be effective. Cookie-block also isn't that effective against them, apparently. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:36, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Shriramwytfield121

✓ Done. I blocked him/her indefinitely and hided 3 edits. Taivo (talk) 09:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:57, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

User:Cukrakalnis. Removing a Category:Pahonia on flags

User: Cukrakalnis (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) .
There is a 1920 flag depicting the coat of arms of the Belarusian People's Republic of Pahonia – File:Flag of Biełaruski Asoby Bataljon u skladzie vojska Letuvy.svg. There is Category: Pahonia on flags. But User:Cukrakalnis removes this category. Strange argument: "because it is already included with Category: Historical military flags of Belarus)". --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 11:04, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

I added Category:Historical military flags of Belarus to the file in this edit. This category has the following categories: Category:Historical flags of Belarus, Category:Military flags of Belarus, Category:Pahonia on flags. It is normal Wikimedia Commons practice to seek to better categorize things. Following Commons rules is not vandalism. The real vandal is Лобачев Владимир, because he considers actions guided by rules as vandalism and constantly goes against those same rules, especially the ones regarding over-categorization.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 12:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
No. It's just another prove that user Cukrakalnis is persistently denying the history of Belarusians based on the stereotypic and not specialized source this user likes and ignoring specialized sources this user doesn't like. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 15:11, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
This statement by Kazimier Lachnovič is a clear indication that this person does not understand Wikimedia policy. Kazimier Lachnovič thinks that following the official policy on Wikimedia Commons about Over-categorization is somehow "denial of Belarusian history". Will someone please explain it to him that official policy is supposed to be followed? He clearly does not understand it.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:44, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
No. I just reasonably connect your previous edit warring to deny the history of Belarusians with this case as well as with the evidence that you are trying to distract the users from normal work in here. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 22:07, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
There was an issue with Over-categorization on the file that this section concerns. Kazimier Lachnovič's statement just goes to show that his goal is to "protect the history of Belarusians", even when no one is threatening it. Kazimier Lachnovič considers my actions, which were fully in line with the official policy of Wikimedia Commons, as "discrimination", "chauvinism" and something that is not "normal work". A clear indication to anyone with a thinking brain that Kazimier Lachnovič is ideologically motivated and is especially not to be trusted in matters concerning history.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 22:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

2.6.62.3

2.6.62.3 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

陳畇榛

User: 陳畇榛 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Upload Non-free file and can't give any permission.

CreeperDigital 13:09, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done User warned, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 14:32, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

User:Cukrakalnis. Removing a Category for Vector Files

User: Cukrakalnis (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 

User removes Category:SVG historical flags of Belarus, which combines vector versions of flags: 01; 02; 03; 04; 05 ; 06. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 16:59, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Лобачев Владимир is misportraying the situation, because the Category:SVG historical flags of Belarus is for flags of Belarus, which necessarily must be after 1918, when Belarus first appeared as a state (according to Encyclopedia Britannica, if anyone doubts what I am saying). Definitely not anything earlier than that, especially not from other countries. This is not vandalism. This is ensuring that Wikimedia Commons is educational instead of counter-educational. Actually, Лобачев Владимир is the real vandal here, by adding categories where they don't belong, e.g. 1 (adding the category of "SVG historical flags of Belarus" to Samogitia, a region in Lithuania), 2 (same as previous one) ,3 (adding the category of "SVG historical flags of Belarus" to Kyiv, a place in Ukraine, among other inaccurate uses of other categories.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:39, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Kazimier Lachnovič deems reliable information from Wikipedia:Encyclopædia Britannica to be "denying the history of Belarusians", "nationalistic chauvinism" and "national decriminations of Belarusians". Here is the link to Encyclopædia Britannica and the relevant quote is "While Belarusians share a distinct ethnic identity and language, they never previously enjoyed unity and political sovereignty, except during a brief period in 1918." The previously refers to previously to the 1990s. Where is the discrimination in following historical facts? The issue here is that Kazimier Lachnovič considers historical facts as discrimination where there is none.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 22:59, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Another example of ignoring by Cukrakalnis the reliable sources he doesn't like. I've already provided this information here, but the user pretends not to notice the quoted reliable sources. So I need to quote these sources in here as well. Andrew Wilson, a British historian specializing in Eastern Europe, writes in his book Belarus: The Last European Dictatorship (Yale University Press, 2012): The entity referred to as medieval ‘Lithuania’ in fact had the full name of ‘Grand Duchy of Lithuania, Rus and Samogitia’. Its short name was ‘Litva’. This is not the same thing as ‘Lithuania’. In the modern Lithuanian language, the word for ‘Lithuania’ is Lietuva (p. 21—22). <...> Most of what is now Belarus was part of ‘Litva’ proper. (p. 33). Moreover, another historian specializing in the history of Central and Eastern Europe Dr. Prof. Timothy D. Snyder writes in his book The Reconstruction of Nations: Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania, Belarus, 1569-1999 (Yale University Press, 2003): During the period of dynastic union with Poland, Lithuania became an East Slavic realm in which the gentry enjoyed rights relative to the sovereign (p. 22). Before 1863, the most common self-appellation of the largest group in Russia’s Northwest Territory — Belarusian-speaking peasants — was apparently “Lithuanian” (p. 49). By removing the historical sense of the term “Lithuanian” in the popular mind, Russian power cleared the way for a modern, ethnic definition of Lithuania, and simplified the task of Lithuanian activists (p. 50). <...> The conflation of an old politonym with a new ethnonym (“Lithuania”) prevented non-Belarusians from seeing the connection between modern Belarus and the early modern Grand Duchy of Lithuania (p. 81) <...> As we have seen, the traditions of the Grand Duchy were altered beyond recognition by Lithuanian and Polish national movements, as well as Russian imperial and Soviet states. They have changed least perhaps in the lands we now call Belarus (p. 281). And I'm not talking about denying by the user the works of Belarusian historians (like "The History of the Belarusan Nation and State", published in English outside Belarus in 2005), which is a another clear prove of the nationalistic chauvinism expressed in denying the history of Belarusians, the people of Belarus. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Kazimier Lachnovič accuses others of what he himself is guilty. He ignores everything, including reliable sources, that go against his preconceived notion of history, but pretends that he is not doing it and that others actually are. His view of history is obviously distorted, because he just copy-pastes the same thing over and over again, without taking into account anything contrary to it, and continues calling historical truth as "nationalistic chauvinism".--Cukrakalnis (talk) 12:43, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
The evidence suggests that I'm not the one who denies the history of some nation by removing the categories connected to this nation by means of edit warring in order to push this obviously chauvinistic national discriminations. So it's really clear who is disruptive here in order to distract the normal users from their constructive work in this project. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 15:28, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
I am not denying the history of any nations. On the contrary, the accuser, Kazimier Lachnovič, himself illegitimately claims and appropriates more history for some nations than they actually have. It can't be "obviously chauvinistic national discriminations" to ensure that accurate categorization is applied. To put this all in perspective, it is not "chauvinistic national discriminations" to remove e.g. Category:France from Category:History of Germany, Category:Russia from Category:History of Ukraine or Category:Belarus from Category:History of Lithuania. My actions are according to the rules, scope and goals of Wikimedia Commons, so Kazimier Lachnovič's statements are nonsense. His portraying me not as a "normal user" is absolute insanity: to shatter his LIES, all one needs to do is look at my contributions, which are very clearly beneficial, especially in off-loading overwhelmed categories, like Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany. Just for that category, I created many categories. In fact, of the 25 categories under Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, I created the following: Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany (1871-1909), Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Anhalt, Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Baden, Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Berg, Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Brunswick, Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Danzig, Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Franconian Circle. Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Frankfurt, Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Hanover, Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Nassau, Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Nürnberg, Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Oldenburg, Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Reuss, Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Saxe-Meiningen, Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach, Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Westphalia, Category:Vinkhuijzen: Military uniforms of Germany, Würzburg were ALL created by me in just the past week. I created a total of 17 categories for better categorization of what once included thousands of files just placed in a huge mix. To portray me as a not normal user like Kazimier Lachnovič is doing, is a straight-out lie. Kazimier Lachnovič's statements, which clearly go against the policy of Wikimedia Commons, should be punished.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:35, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Totally irrelevant to the situation and clearly absurd example («to remove e.g. Category:France from Category:History of Germany, Category:Russia from Category:History of Ukraine or Category:Belarus from Category:History of Lithuania») is another sound evidence that user Cukrakalnis is just trying to disrupt the normal project functionality. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 22:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Kazimier Lachnovič clearly did not understand that removing claims of a certain country to another country's history is not chauvinistic. It is precisely the reverse, it is anti-chauvinistic. That is precisely how the project normally should function and Kazimier Lachnovič's claim that this is somehow evidence of disruption just goes to show that Kazimier Lachnovič is himself a disruptive user. When given SOLID EVIDENCE that I am a BENEFICIAL CONTRIBUTOR to the project, Kazimier Lachnovič just dismisses it as irrelevant. He is clearly not acting in good faith.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Beside total misunderstanding of what chauvinism is, the user just revealed their motivation here: «removing claims of a certain country to another country's history is not chauvinistic. It is precisely the reverse, it is anti-chauvinistic». It actually is aggressive removing any connection of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania to Belarusians, despite many reliable sources (not only Belarusian, but also not anyhow connected to Belarus and Belarusians) confirming such a connection. To prove that the user is well informed about such recognized connection, I quote en:Alfredas Bumblauskas, ″one of the best known Lithuanian historians″ (English Wikipedia): Norwegian linguist Christian Schweigaard Stang determined that at first Vytautas’ office was dominated by Ukrainian language (Volhynia), which later switched to Belarusian (Novogrudok, Polock, Grodno). In a way, we offended Belarus by forgetting that there is no single sentence in Lithuanian in the Lithuanian Metrica. We called the language Chancery Slavonic (of GDL Slavs) – a term panned by Professor Gudavičius, as the language was used not only in GDL, but in Poland, as well; and, as Poles are Slavic, the definition becomes incorrect. The language was not used only in office, but in poetry, as well. However, the attitude of Lithuanians is slowly changing. At first everyone was outraged that Belarusians are stealing our history. I say, however, that they have been part of our history for a long time. <...> The present-day events in Belarus seem to allow us a more peaceful look to our common history and show kindness in sharing it». --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 22:08, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Kazimier Lachnovič's "response" (not really a response, because he ignored most of what was said by me in the previous message then he went on some irrelevant tangent) demonstrates this user's incompetency and limited, cherry-picked understanding of history. He will not admit that he is wrong or that it is somehow against behaviour guidelines on Wikimedia Commons to denigrate another user and his contributions to the project. And the motivation Kazimier Lachnovič revealed is absolutely in-line with Wikimedia Commons' scope, which is to be educational, instead of engaging in pseudo-historical lies of Litvinism or any other ideology, which are inherently counter-educational. The motivation of removing claims of a certain country to another country's history is absolutely justified, and even commendable. In fact, such actions are necessary to ensure that the project of Wikimedia Commons stays true to its educational goals.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 21:49, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Another prove, that the user just ignore the reliable sources they don't like (that time it is the opinion of modern Lithuanian historian Alfredas Bumblauskas). But I'm not sure that any admin really follows. If someone does, please let me know. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 16:24, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
This is not proof of anything except Kazimier Lachnovič's inability to accept and behave according to Wikimedia Commons policies and guidelines, especially considering categorization.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 20:29, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done Reverted. Both users warned. Yann (talk) 22:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

User:Cukrakalnis. Removing a Category:Historical military flags of Belarus

File:Grunwald Pogoń czerwona.svg
Removing a counter-educational and ahistorical category. The user independently decided that Category:Historical military flags of Belarus is anti-historical, and he decides for himself what can be included in it and what not. Please return the category and remind the participant that personal preferences in the project are not desirable. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 11:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Ensuring that historical facts are taken into account is portrayed by Лобачев Владимир as "personal preferences". That Medieval flag, File:Grunwald Pogoń czerwona.svg, cannot be a flag of Belarus, because, as Wikipedia:Encyclopædia Britannica and many other sources state: Belarus as a state appeared only in 1918. There can't be a flag of something that did not exist at the time. If anyone doubts this basic historical knowledge, here you go: link to Encyclopædia Britannica: While Belarusians share a distinct ethnic identity and language, they never previously enjoyed unity and political sovereignty, except during a brief period in 1918. (previously to 1991), link to Encyclopedia of Nationalism (2nd volume), with the relevant quote on page 45: The only real national statehood that could pass for being Belarusian in letter and in spirit was the Belarusian National Republic (BNR), declared in Minsk on March 25, 1918 . In contrast to how Лобачев Владимир is portraying the situation, the reality is that he is himself guided by personal preferences, as he creates fictional flags with elements deriving from his fantasy, and attempts to label them as "historical", e.g. File:Flag of Duchy of Samogitia (1419-1795).svg. With this flag, Лобачев Владимир takes an element of truth, which is indeed based on sources (e.g. that the flag's main colour was indeed recorded in sources as white), but then he adds "Ioannes Casimirus", "Zmudzka" and a bizarre, rectangular pattern surrounding the centre of the flag, none of which are based on anything, except on Лобачев Владимир's fantasy and conjecture. Labelling such creations as "historical" is against Commons' goal of being educational.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 12:36, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
  • The Grand Duchy of Lithuania is the part of history of Belarus, as well as the history of the Republic of Lithuania (which own name is Lietuva). The Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Republic of Lithuania are not the same (according to the reliable sources I have provided here, i.e. Prof. Snyder, Dr. Wilson, many Belarusian historians). So either both categories must be removed or both must be present. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 15:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Kazimier Lachnovič does not understand how categorization works on Wikimedia Commons. The Russian Empire is part of the history of Lithuania, as well as Belarus, Ukraine, and Finland, among others. EVEN THEN, in Category:Russian Empire, there is ONLY Category:History of Russia and not Category:History of Lithuania, Category:History of Belarus, Category:History of Ukraine, Category:History of Finland. And that is how it is supposed to be. Another example is Category:Kingdom of Hungary, which has only Category:Political history of Hungary from among such history categories. This is in spite of the Kingdom of Hungary including parts or the entirety of modern Slovakia, Romania, Serbia, Croatia. None of them placed Category:History of ... on Category:Kingdom of Hungary. Ergo, it is only logical that a similar situation should apply to Category:Grand Duchy of Lithuania, so that it has ONLY Category:History of Lithuania. As for the other part, of course, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Republic of Lithuania are not the same, just like the Russian Empire is not the same as the Federation of Russia, and the Kingdom of France is not the French Republic or the Belarusian National Republic is not the Republic of Belarus. That is beside the point.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 20:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
  • If you follow your logic, then the Middle Ages history of Polotsk, Vitebsk, Minsk, Novogrudok, all cities and territories of Belarus belongs to the Republic of Lithuania, but does not belong to the Belarusian Republic. This is very similar to the ideology of Lithuanian chauvinism. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 21:11, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
The logic I explained is only applicable at the level of states. At the level of cities and towns, the categories that should be used are different. For example, Category:Bratislava was part of the Category:Kingdom of Hungary from the 10th century to 1918. But even then, there is no Category:History of Hungary. The same goes for Belarus, e.g. Category:Minsk was part of the Category:Grand Duchy of Lithuania from 13th century to 1795, but that does not mean that the category will have Category:History of Lithuania. Both Лобачев Владимир and Kazimier Lachnovič are obsessed with calling on Lithuanian chauvinism, while all I am doing is just following Wikimedia Commons policy.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 22:51, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
  • There are no reliable sources that Russian Empire was anyhow Belarusian state, but there are quite enough such sources that the Grand Duchy of Lithuanian was more Belarusian then Lithuanian (in modern sense with the own name lt:Lietuviai) state. So like I said based on provided sources either both categories (History of Belarus and History of Lithuania) must be removed or both must be present. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Kazimier Lachnovič's statements are indicative of the fringe pseudohistorical theory of Litvinism. The Grand Duchy of Lithuania is regularly called the "medieval Lithuanian state": 1, 2, 3 or even as Lithuanian empire - as is here. Clearly, if the Belarusian element had been so dominant, then the state would not be called Lithuanian so often. Kazimier Lachnovič's statement that there are sources proving that the Grand Duchy of Lithuania was more Belarusian than Lithuanian is nonsense, for many reasons (this list is non-exhaustive): the country itself was founded on Lithuania proper by ethnic Lithuanians, the Grand Duchy's official religion was Catholic (not Orthodox) after the pagan Lithuanians (the founders of the state according to Encyclopedia Britannica) were baptised into the Catholic faith, the rulers were Lithuanian-speaking (as is clearly made here with many sources), the dominant nobility was the Catholic (Lithuanian) one, as it had privileges not given to the Slavic nobility and many other arguments refuting Kazimier Lachnovič's distortion of history.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 23:49, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
This is all your personal opinion. But there are no sources that directly state that the rights to the historical heritage of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania are exclusively owned by the Republic of Lithuania. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 10:55, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Without providing reliable sources (like I told you before, reference to any English Wikipedia article is just a poor attempt to disrupt the discussion because according to the rules of that project en:Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source), that criticize the reliable sources provided by me, your references could be a prove just for the opinion that the Grand Duchy of Lithuania was Lithuanian state AS WELL. It means that both categories must be present, removing one of them is clear push of nationalistic (actually chauvinistic) POV, which should be stopped. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 21:50, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Stating historical facts is not a personal opinion. As for 'reference to any ... Wikipedia article is just a poor attempt to disrupt the discussion', Kazimier Lachnovič referenced a Wikipedia article with "lt:Lietuviai" in a previous message. Kazimier Lachnovič is a hypocrite. Moreover, Kazimier Lachnovič's conclusion that "both categories must be present" is a total obfuscation and misportrayal of the actual situation. As I explained in a previous section, it is clear that Kazimier Lachnovič is ideologically motivated as he refuses to remove a category because that is "denial of Belarusian history" (according to him), even if that category should be removed to curb overcategorization.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 22:01, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment So the user just admitted that they don't have reliable sources, that are critical to the reliable sources provided by me. This is clear and direct recognition of nationalistic (more precise chauvinistic) POV pushing. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 16:27, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Kazimier Lachnovič is once more making conclusions based on nothing while repeatedly refusing to acknowledge that he is a hypocrite and ideologically motivated, if anyone even pays attention to all of this. To top this all of, Kazimier Lachnovič accuses others of what he is guilty of, namely a nationalistic POV.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 20:32, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

2600:1011:B00A:3258:B09A:4240:38A5:12A6

User: 2600:1011:B00A:3258:B09A:4240:38A5:12A6 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: cross-wiki vandalism, already warned; blocked elsewhere (cf. edits on enwiki and mediawikiwiki.)

Hasley 20:39, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the IP temporarily. Taivo (talk) 21:50, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Md Rahat Islam 1997

User: Md Rahat Islam 1997 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: vandalism multiple user's talkpage Stang★ 01:22, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

User also continues to upload copyrighted images, after being warned to cease. Bidgee (talk)
More copyvio files: Special:ListFiles/Md Rahat Islam 1997. Mostly screenshots and copyrighted video game settings or movie scenes being shown on a monitor. The interface of the monitor might be unfree too if it is not a free interface (e.g. Windows). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:44, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. User is indefinitely blocked and globally locked as sockpuppet. All uploads are deleted. Taivo (talk) 21:48, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Diskdrive15

 Not done. You warned the user and at moment that's enough. Taivo (talk) 21:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Celniku

User: Celniku (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: A sock of Musée Annam, seems to make something up about the "No-U Movement" and adding random files to it, I don't like asking for this but please just do a massive rollback on the edits that add this, they are known for creating weird definitions of categories.

Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 08:21, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

  •  Addendum, slightly different modus operandi, do not delete their uploads and nominate the provincial emblem for deletion in a DR. Probably not delete any pages they made or their user sub-page for the supposed "No-U Movement", I will review their edits after their block, but anyone familiar with these edits can tell that it's Musée Annam. Notice the editing of Vietnamese flags with odd categorisation, completely re-inventing categories, uploading a Vietnamese provincial emblem, tagging public domain images as "Own work", and the general pages they edit. I usually don't request a block for them until they're being disruptive but they always seem to mess with categories in a way that only seems to make sense to them. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:27, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Culture_of_the_South_China_Sea I don't know what a "Culture of the South China Sea" / "Culture of the Asean Sea" is supposed to represent but I can't find it anywhere else, the No-U Movement is legitimate as it's a (very large) part of the Vietnamese Democracy Movement, but this Musée Annam sock's edits still require a review and as they keep reverting my reverts I will wait for a block before reviewing their edits, they did some good edits, so they will need to be carefully reviewed and not carelessly rolled back. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 20:14, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 Hilarious addendum, he left a funny comment about how I'm a dog 🐶 who can't understand human language and how I should start carrying a knife (which I already do, though because of other people threatening me IRL) because he would do something to me, LOL. He then proceeds with a rant calling me stupid and noticebly referring to Vietnamese as "Duck 🦆 language" (a staple of Musée Annam rants), please don't censor his rant as I prefer to keep a public record of such events, just that this is a very typical Musée Annam rant. Though the longer he's unblocked the more damage he does to categories. Again, please don't mass-delete their edits, I will take the time to review the good ones from the bad ones. This is hilarious because he's a member of the 8X generation yet threatens people online like you would expect from a 10 (ten) year old. Not meant as an insult, just an observation. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:39, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 Comment At first I blocked Celniku for a week. Now I will go to sleep and tomorrow I will continue with his/her edits. Maybe the block must be longer. Taivo (talk) 22:00, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Kind of find it odd that a globally locked sockmaster known for threatening users gets a 1 (one) week block for death threats while users "Rodhullandemu" and "Jdx" get banned for life, well, c'est la vie, I guess. Anyhow, the main type of abuse this Musée Annam sock does is in categorisation (which I would argue are more damaging than some death threats that only arouse laughter from its target, LOL) as they seem to have invented a number of non-sensical forms of categorisations like the "Culture of the South China Sea" and adding the "No-U Movement" (which is a legitimate movement) to encompass all opposition towards both the Vietnamese Communist Party (VCP) and Chinese expansionalism on perceived Vietnamese territories. Musée Annam often has these own "invented definitions" of terms which judging from my experience in volunteering with vulnerable individuals makes me think that he suffers from either a form of Autism or Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder especially in light of them maliciously socking for over a decade (but then again, I am not a psychologist and these are just observations of similarities in behaviour with these mental and developmental disorders, I do not mean to insult them only try to understand why they act so idiosyncratic and easily to identify), I don't want to call the users that usually hunt this sockmaster because they're all deletionists and would also undo his good edits, which I believe would be detrimental to undo, but my main reason for reporting him is because I believe that the negatives of his edits with this account outweigh his positive edits, such as replacing free images with copyrighted ones (a staple Musée Annam behaviour) and mislicensing files. Anyhow, this user is a Human Rights Activist (like the Nipponese Dog Calvero family of socks) so I would say that there is a certain sense of nobility in his edits and if he lashes out against me I do not hold it against him as he is frustrated with a misanthropic system he wishes to overthrow, but still, this doesn't justify inventing bullshit things like a supposed "South China Sea culture" that somehow includes Hong Kong, Viet-Nam, and a vague definition of other places based on nothing other than his fantasy, that simply doesn't have a place on the Wikimedia Commons. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 09:08, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment, I've undone most of the stuff I can immediately identify as bad edits, I am not opposed to Musée Annam being a regular contributor to this website as I think that they have a lot of valuable uploads to add to this website, I have checked most of their categories and 95% (ninety-five percent) of their page creations appear to be good page creations and useful, I have nominated the bad categories for discussion so please do not nuke his edits. The people at CfD can probably handle the rest of his mess, not sure if I should tag this section as "Resolved" and only report him if he will continue to vandalise after unblock or not. Usually I watch Musée Annam socks for weeks and they tend to be largely good or largely harmless until you actually expose them as Musée Annam socks, anyhow, I think that they probably would vandalise again but I am open to watching this sock after the block expires and then only report them again after they would start making bad edits again (again, most of their edits are good). --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 09:28, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Donald, I am really sorry. I extended the block indefinitely. Yesterday I had no time to Google translate his words, today I did it and indefinite block is a proper punishment. Sometimes I feel, that I am the only who works in AN. You complained on 4th of December, I came back on 6th of December and none of administrators did anything meanwhile. Taivo (talk) 17:55, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

MUHAMMADSHAHZAD11

User: MUHAMMADSHAHZAD11 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: The user have just uploaded 1 images which can be speedy deleted under CSD Criterion G3. The CSD G3 suggests Users that commit such acts are subjected to their accounts being temporarily or permanently blocked. As the user have not made any useful edits since a year, I suggest permanently blocking him for no vandalism behalf of this user after time. Contributers2020Talk to me here 07:17, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

 Not done. But I do not consider this neither vandalism, threat nor attack. What did he actually say? That Google robot is not a muslim. I would surprise, if Google would say, that his robot is a muslim. User has not edited for a year, so block is not practical. The only upload is nominated for deletion, that's enough. Taivo (talk) 17:46, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

2.26.157.214

User: 2.26.157.214 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: vandalism despite warnings; blocked on enwiki as well.

Hasley 18:12, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Blocked and reverted. Taivo (talk) 15:51, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Bayu Fuller

User: Bayu Fuller (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Continuous disruptive edits on this map. Already given a warning here, but the user just uploaded another map version. If you take a look at his map updates you can see that the background gets messed up every time. After pointing that out, the user made no effort to stop the disruptive edits or fix the background disruption.

Ratherous (talk) 10:56, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Please note that the reported user just tried to delete this report here - [1]. --Ratherous (talk) 11:32, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
✓ blocked the user for 3 days and placed the full protection on the file uploads rubin16 (talk) 12:00, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Sandiey X

User: Sandiey X (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mitte27&diff=612456578&oldid=608920331 Mitte27 (talk) 17:51, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked Sandiey indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 17:59, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

1l5082783312

✓ Done. I blocked the user indefinitely, because all his/her edits consisted of adding copyrighted text (copyright message in the very end). I hided all edits. No vandalism, though. Taivo (talk) 10:44, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Buddyemus

User: Buddyemus (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Sock, cross-wiki abuse, images are hoaxes or copyvios. See Wikipedia sock investigation for linked user. Citing (talk) 16:11, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

 Not done. Buddyemus is not registered in en.wiki, so no evidence of sockpuppetry is given. All his uploads are nominated for deletion. At moment that's all. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

怡秀許凱翔沈淑蘭陳怡婷吳政勳劉政勳劉定瑋彥霖陳蘭貞葉品緯

User: 怡秀許凱翔沈淑蘭陳怡婷吳政勳劉政勳劉定瑋彥霖陳蘭貞葉品緯 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: sockpuppeter active on Chinese Wikipedia uploading random non-educational files here.

✓ Done Yann (talk) 08:48, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

劉定瑋劉妍鈴葉品緯陳彥霖譚哲文

User: 劉定瑋劉妍鈴葉品緯陳彥霖譚哲文 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: sockpuppeter active on Chinese Wikipedia uploading random non-educational files here.

✓ Done Yann (talk) 08:49, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

陳妍安

User: 陳妍安 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: sockpuppeter active on Chinese Wikipedia uploading random non-educational files here.

✓ Done Yann (talk) 08:48, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

江月嬌許凱翔陳怡婷劉怡秀蕭名秀蕭如芬詹金麗陳彥霖劉定瑋

User: 江月嬌許凱翔陳怡婷劉怡秀蕭名秀蕭如芬詹金麗陳彥霖劉定瑋 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: sockpuppeter active on Chinese Wikipedia uploading random non-educational files here. Midleading (talk) 06:27, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Yann (talk) 08:48, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

詹金麗阿麗師姐

User: 詹金麗阿麗師姐 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: sockpuppeter active on Chinese Wikipedia uploading random non-educational files here.

Midleading (talk) 10:17, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

蕭如芬老師熊淑芬老師

User: 蕭如芬老師熊淑芬老師 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: sockpuppeter active on Chinese Wikipedia uploading random non-educational files here.

Midleading (talk) 10:19, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Manitarski

User: Manitarski (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: As seen on the talk page, this user has 37 talk file notices with having speedy notices, DR notices etc. and this is happening since 20th April. I suggest to indeff this user.

Contributers2020Talk to me here 05:28, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Manitarski was not formally warned, so I warned him. Taivo (talk) 14:25, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Cukrakalnis

User: Cukrakalnis (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Removing Category:History of Belarus in Category:Grand Duchy of Lithuania, the reliable sources provided on the talk page are ignored by the user

Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 21:14, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Yet again Kazimier Lachnovič demonstrates a lack of understanding of how categorization works on Wikimedia Commons. For clearly ideological reasons, Kazimier Lachnovič considers removing over-categorization as "denial of Belarusian history" and "distracting users from normal work". As I stated in an edit that explained my revert, Kingdom of Hungary is part of Slovakian history, but the Category:Kingdom of Hungary does not have Category:History of Slovakia, but has Category:Political history of Hungary. Following the example of a non-contentious case, there should be Category:History of Lithuania for Category:Grand Duchy of Lithuania, like that would be the case already if not for ideologically-motivated Belarusian nationalists. Kazimier Lachnovič's actions are directly inspired by a Belarusian nationalistic view of history, as many sources which I provided on the talk page with this edit will attest.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 21:27, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
The Grand Duchy of Lithuania is regularly called the "medieval Lithuanian state": 1, 2, 3 or even as Lithuanian empire - as is here. Kazimier Lachnovič's statement that the Grand Duchy of Lithuania was a Belarusian state is a clearly Belarusian nationalist and Litvinist statement, and he is simply misportraying a loud minority as a majority. The very fact that the Grand Duchy of Lithuania is called of Lithuania is by itself sufficient to compare it to the Kingdom of Hungary which is called of Hungary, or the Kingdom of France which is called of France. No amount of distortions or twisting of historical reality can change that.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 22:03, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Quoting "medieval Lithuanian state" means nothing. According to the several specialized reliable sources (Dr. Prof. Timothy D. Snyder, Dr. Andrew Wilson, Dr. Jan Zaprudnik, Dr. Prof. Norman Davies) the historical meaning of term Lithuania (Lithuanian) differs significantly from the modern one. According to these specialized reliable sources the own name of the GDL was Litva (Belarusian Літва = Litva), while the own name of modern Lithuania is Lietuva. User Cukrakalnis didn't provide any reliable source criticizing these sources. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 22:17, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Quoting "medieval Lithuanian state" does mean something, just like "medieval French state" or "medieval Spanish state" has a meaning. Litva itself is a derivative of the original Lietuva, as the many sources collected on this website will clearly demonstrate, so your argument means nothing.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 22:24, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
The difference is that there are no specialized reliable sources that states that historical meaning of term French or Spanish differs significantly from the modern ones. So the comparison is clearly irrelevant. And the reference to self-published nationalistic website is another prove of disruptiveness. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 22:29, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Dismissing the linked page as nationalistic is a clear indication that Kazimier Lachnovič is completely entranced in his highly nationalist view - the linked page just provided clear primary sources that Lithuania's original name is Lietuva instead of Litva, unless Kazimier Lachnovič wants to call 13th-century German chroniclers like Peter of Dusburg, 17th-century official decrees from the state in question, i.e. Grand Duchy of Lithuania, and 19th-century Polish and German scholars as "Lithuanian nationalist". This by itself should indicate how disoriented Kazimier Lachnovič's thinking is.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 22:39, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
A reasonable administrator, upon closer inspection of the link I gave, would only agree with me. There is no nationalist narrative on the page, only a large variety of primary sources that absolutely demolishes Kazimier Lachnovič's fantasy that Lietuva as a name was not used to describe the Grand Duchy of Lithuania itself. The disruptiveness is on the part of Kazimier Lachnovič, who fails to acknowledge anything that he dislikes. He has not acknowledged that he was wrong with regards to over-categorization and in calling me a disruptive user, even if I contribute significantly to off-loading categories and helping better categorize the material. I will reiterate that Kazimier Lachnovič considers fixing over-categorization as "denial of Belarusian history". It is clear that he is ideologically driven and goes against Wikimedia policies.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 23:07, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment So instead of following contemporary specialized reliable sources (like «For this reason many historians argue that the medieval Grand Duchy of Lithuania was the first Belarusian nation state» in Ethnic Groups of Europe: An Encyclopedia, ABC-Clio 2011 by American anthropologist Dr. Prof. Jeffrey Cole, who is an expert on race and ethnicity in Europe, and Dr. Prof. Stephan E. Nikolov, a Senior Fellow researcher at the Bulgarian Academy of Science, Institute of Sociology and Associated Professor at the Neofit Rilski Southwestern University Blagoevgrad) the user suggests to do original research by reading «large variety of primary sources». Is the link to «primary sources» on some self-published website a justification for edit warring in order to deny the history of one nation by aggressive removing the category?! --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 21:38, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
    The way that Kazimier Lachnovič uses sources is indicative of his tendency to twist history. A precise example is the quote and source he emphasises. The article was not written by the American anthropologist Dr. Prof. Jeffrey Cole, but only by Stephan E. Nikolov. Such basic misattribution is indicative of the low level of Kazimier Lachnovič’s grasp of the topic at hand and sources about it. Then, he leaves out an important element from the source, which is that “The Ruthenian language, which later evolved into modern Belarusian, was the official language there.” Language itself is not a sufficient basis to claim a country, because some languages were used as lingua franca, and so to claim that the 18th-century Kingdom of Prussia was somehow a French state because it used French in its official proceedings is nonsense. It should be clear to all that the use of a certain language does not immediately mean the country belongs to those that write that language. Later on, the article itself states “In the 14th century, while being incorporated to Lithuania, Belarusians never lost their national identity.” This is a major statement that CONTRADICTS Kazimier Lachnovič’s whole argument. How can a country be incorporated to something which it supposedly already is? It can’t, and ergo the Grand Duchy of Lithuania was NOT Belarus. How can a national identity be lost in a state that is supposedly your own? This source clearly implies that the Grand Duchy of Lithuana was not a Belarusian state, and the centre of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania were always the ethnic Lithuanians, which still exist now, while the Belarusians were part of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, but never were the Lithuanians.The sources that Kazimier Lachnovič uses contradict him. Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:29, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Grand Duchy of Lithuania 1462 within modern boundaries
  • The user just trying to mess the discussion. The article by Dr. Stephan E. Nikolov is published in the Encyclopedia “Ethnic Groups of Europe”, which is edited by the American anthropologist Dr. Prof. Jeffrey Coleю. So there is no any misattribution. And the article clearly states that «For this reason many historians argue that the medieval Grand Duchy of Lithuania was the first Belarusian nation state», which considering the other sources is quite enough to stop the disruptive user of their aggressive nationalistic (chauvinistic) POV pushing. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 20:46, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
The misattribution was in not clearly stating that Dr. Prof. Jeffrey Cole was the editor overall of the Encyclopedia. The way Kazimier Lachnovič wrote made it seem that the American Professor was the actual writer of the article, as Kazimier Lachnovič did not clearly state any distinction between editors and authors. Moreover, Kazimier Lachnovič fails to understand the context in which that sentence is written and flat out denies the rest of the source he is supposedly referencing (more like twisting it in directions he prefers, taking out only one sentence and leaving all others). It is clear that he denies the rest of the source, just see my message on 19:29, 11 December. The Encyclopedia itself does not state that the Grand Duchy of Lithuania was actually a Belarusian state (which is patently false), it only points out that there is such a view. And that the view is based on “The Ruthenian language, which later evolved into modern Belarusian, was the official language there.” To claim an entire state as being a country of that written language is not strong, because the same logic is never applied elsewhere. The medieval Western European states used a lot of Latin in their documents, are they suddenly Latin states? Of course not. Moreover, Kazimier Lachnovič ignores everything presented to him and instead accuses others of "aggressive nationalistic (chauvinistic) POV pushing". Such behaviour clearly contradicts Wikimedia Commons policy and it is problematic that Kazimier Lachnovič is allowed to rampage with his toxic ideological behaviour.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 21:04, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

The Grand Duchy of Lithuania was liquidated in 1792-1795 and became part of the Russian Empire. The Russian emperor was called the Grand Duke of Lithuania. After the revolution of 1917, the Republic of Lithuania was formed on a part of the empire (without the Vilnius region). Thus, the modern Republic of Lithuania is not a continuation of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. And the modern Republic of Lithuania appeared after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Historically, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, with the official Old Belarusian language, was located on the territories of modern states: Poland, Lithuania, Belarus, Russia, Moldavi. Why the right to the historical heritage should belong exclusively to the Republic of Lithuania is not clear. Formally, the Russian Federation is the legal successor of the Soviet Union and the Russian Empire. It is she who can lay claim to the historical heritage. But the Republic of Lithuania does not have any internationally recognized documents on the rights of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 10:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

The Tsar of Russia was titled the King of Poland. Does that mean that all of Polish history is suddenly Russian? Of course not, so the same applies to Lithuanian history. Does anyone internationally consider Russia as the successor state of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania? No. In mainstream reliable sources, the continuity between of Lithuania, first as the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (13th century-1795) and then as the Republic of Lithuania (1918-1940; 1990-) is affirmed by numerous statements like "When the independent Lithuanian state was reestablished in 1918" in The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society (2019) (unknown page because of copyright), Editor: Professor, PhD Debra L. Merskin (not specialized in history, but still goes to show the prevalence of the statement), "the reinstating of Lithuania's independence in 1918" p360, sub-chapter 7.1 The Historical Development, Chapter 7 - General frameworks of Lithuanian Law, book called The Law of the Baltic States (many editors), "in 1918 the reestablished Lithuanian state" p210, Handbook of European Intelligence Cultures and many more.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 20:30, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Administrators! Stop aggressive nationalistic (chauvinistic) POV pushing by the clearly disruprive user Cukrakalnis, who systematically ignores reliable sources. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 20:55, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
    Kazimier Lachnovič ignores everything presented to him and instead accuses others of "aggressive nationalistic (chauvinistic) POV pushing" and other things that are not grounded in reality. Such behaviour clearly contradicts Wikimedia Commons policy and it is problematic that Kazimier Lachnovič is allowed to rampage with his toxic ideological behaviour. Cukrakalnis (talk) 21:06, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
  • User Cukrakalnis was clearly warned [2]: “If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing – even if you are right about the content issue”, but they just did three reverts in 24 hours in order to aggressively deny the history of Belarusians. The user ignores the reliable sources and arguments provided here as well as on the talk page of dispute category against such explicit discrimination of Belarusians and tries to mess the duscussion by all possible means including referring to primary and not-specialized sources and authors. I do really ask administrators to stop this disruptive behaviour! --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 21:32, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
The edit-war that the message concerned was about the Category:Fictional flags of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and did not involve Kazimier Lachnovič but concerned Лобачев Владимир. I followed the Wikimedia Commons policy and did not do any more reverting concerning that category. Kazimier Lachnovič is confusing different things from different times. As I have constantly repeated and soundly reasoned, the fact that Kazimier Lachnovič views following the Wikimedia Commons policy on over-categorization as "denial of Belarusian history" clearly shows he is IDEOLOGICALLY MOTIVATED and does NOT care about Wikimedia Commons policy, scope and goals. There is no messing of discussion - the things he is referring to is just my rebuttals that collapse his entire argument and which he cannot refute, and as he will not admit that he was wrong, he will call other users like me names like "nationalistic", "chauvinistic" and etc. etc. Kazimier Lachnovič should be punished for flagrantly and repeatedly going against Wikimedia Commons policy on behaviour, by making false and slanderous statements about me and my actions.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 22:11, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

162.218.183.189

User: 162.218.183.189 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Change author of images with no reason Stang★ 20:55, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the IP. Thanks for reverting! Taivo (talk) 18:13, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

2.26.157.214

User: 2.26.157.214 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: inserting meaningless text Stang★ 21:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Already blocked, nonsense is reverted. Taivo (talk) 18:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Qatalpult

User: Qatalpult (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: contiously upload out of scope map, warning applied Stang★ 01:38, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. One week block. Quite funny uploads, though. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

ZAREI 2020

✓ Done Blocked. Yann (talk) 12:18, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
@Yann: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:40, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

علي محمد علي ابو سنيد

User: علي محمد علي ابو سنيد (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: add nonsense text to File:TZExample.jpg

Stang★ 17:15, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Last warning. Yann (talk) 12:21, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

2.6.0.0/16

 Comment for the record: Might be IP socks of Coline Cantou (talk · contribs) who was trolling since May 2021. --Achim55 (talk) 08:57, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
@Infrogmation and Achim55: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:54, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

2401:4900:5B88:17AE:DCC4:BFB3:EADE:6B62

✓ Done. 3 days block for spamming. Taivo (talk) 22:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:13, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

214.3.138.230

✓ Done Yann (talk) 12:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
@Yann: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:39, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Pentto software

✓ Done thanks to Herbythyme!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:54, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Vinod Gariya

 Not done. The user stopped after you warned him. Taivo (talk) 22:08, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Agusan flags

User: Agusan flags (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Sock puppet of Jurisdrew. 91.221.17.220 06:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Globally locked. Taivo (talk) 17:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Becce Motorsports

 Not done. No activity after you warned the user. In my opinion the username is acceptable, but if others will block him/her, I will not protest. Taivo (talk) 17:07, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

71.47.84.22

✓ Done. Globally locked. Thanks for reverting! Taivo (talk) 17:05, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks, and you're welcome!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:48, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Bayang Ilirt

User: Bayang Ilirt (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Sock puppet of Jurisdrew. Vandalism in progress, please revert. --91.221.17.220 07:20, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the user indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 13:52, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Rio2003

 Not done. No activity after you warned Rio. If (s)he continues spamming, let us know. Taivo (talk) 15:18, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

حسین_فریدونی_نیا

User: حسین_فریدونی_نیا (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Contiously uploading images that are not his/her own work. S/He has got the last warning by Taivo but again uploaded such images(e.g. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D9%86%D9%82%D8%B4%D9%87_%D8%B4%D9%87%D8%B1%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%86_%D8%AF%D8%B4%D8%AA%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%86.png). Here is the link to the last warning: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:%D8%AD%D8%B3%DB%8C%D9%86_%D9%81%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%AF%D9%88%D9%86%DB%8C_%D9%86%DB%8C%D8%A7#You_may_be_blocked_soon

Rohalamin (talk) 09:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

نقشه کار خودم بود حسین فریدونی نیا (talk) 10:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. I blocked the user for a week and deleted a copyvio (not own work, © on image itself). Taivo (talk) 17:20, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
@Taivo And also this one needs to be deleted because of © on image itself. Rohalamin (talk) 11:58, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done. Taivo (talk) 12:47, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

President Marriott William Kruger

User: President Marriott William Kruger (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Another sock puppet of Morris Kiyosaki Technique and Morris William Kruger (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  which should be blocked permanently and his ludicrous uploads of photos of himself and capture of documents categorizing him as a president or a king be deleted. Pierre cb (talk) 06:46, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Blocked, tagged, all uploads deleted. Taivo (talk) 12:51, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

ID Act

User: ID Act (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Another sock puppet of Morris Kiyosaki Technique and Morris William Kruger (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  which should be blocked permanently and his ludicrous uploads of photos of himself and capture of documents categorizing him as a president or a king be deleted. Pierre cb (talk) 06:46, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Blocked, tagged, all deleted. Claims to be son of Paul Kruger and Marlene Dietrich. Taivo (talk) 12:57, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

RDominguezHernandez

User: RDominguezHernandez (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Uploads multiple times the same out-of-scope picture under different names. The user should be blocked and the pictures deleted. Pierre cb (talk) 14:59, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I warned the user. Taivo (talk) 16:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Afro Europeans

User: Afro Europeans (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
User: Sarang Haido (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Sock puppets of Jurisdrew. Please revert the flags they overwrote to the previous states. This also applies to User:Bayang Ilirt mentioned above. --91.221.17.220 10:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked both sockpuppets and semi-protected one page. Their edits are in my opinion reverted, mostly thanks to Fry. Taivo (talk) 16:15, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

DelawareMatt

User: DelawareMatt (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: User still have copyvii problems despite warning s and blocks. 182.239.121.130 18:48, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

 Not done. At moment seems, that he has no bad uploads after May. Taivo (talk) 19:09, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Kakaart12

User: Kakaart12 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Edit test. User warned.

Stang★ 10:09, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked as VOA. Yann (talk) 10:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

92.40.190.157

User: 92.40.190.157 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: File:Pound cake.JPG, LTA

Stang★ 22:40, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Vandalism of this section, too.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:52, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done Blocked by AntiCompositeNumber for 31 hours. Jianhui67 T★C 06:00, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

2401:4900:38C6:2E01:C293:DB82:64E2:B253

User: 2401:4900:38C6:2E01:C293:DB82:64E2:B253 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Add meaningless content to file description pages. Stang★ 10:43, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Blocked by Achim, all reverted. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Pichpich22

User: Pichpich22 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: remove {{Copyvio}} template from their uploads, warned.

Stang★ 08:43, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Possibly a new sock-puppet: Khmermusic9 (talk · contribs). --Túrelio (talk) 15:25, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
កាដួយម៉ែ Sock ម៉្រាយហែអ Khmermusic9 (talk) 15:31, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
អាឈាមថោក អាឆ្កែ ទើសរហូត កាដួយម៉ែអាមុខងាប់ Khmermusic9 (talk) 15:31, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done Blocked. Yann (talk) 18:10, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
+ Manith44 (talk · contribs) --ManFromNord (talk) 20:59, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Has uploaded the same copyvios. Blocked. --Túrelio (talk) 22:25, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Contributer1234

User: Contributer1234 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Continuing disruption - was blocked on the English Wikipedia, so has come here to disrupt further by being annoying.

~TNT (she/they • talk) 16:50, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for a day with a strong warning. Older edits were already self-reverted on November 1st, 2021. Yann (talk) 17:57, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Selena2019

 Not done. Selena stopped after you warned her. I deleted one unneeded talkpage redirect. Taivo (talk) 08:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Cukrakalnis

User: Cukrakalnis (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Chauvinistic vandalism on the Category:Grand Duchy of Lithuania against the sources provided on the talk page. Page protection is required.

Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 11:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Kazimier Lachnovič is misportraying the situation. He himself does not answer the objections of other users and only seeks to push through his own ideological POV.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 18:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

C22H30N6O4S

User: C22H30N6O4S (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Abuse: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Yawning_Infant,_August_2018.jpg&action=history

Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 14:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Indef'd as vandalism-only account. --Túrelio (talk) 15:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

31.182.189.19

User: 31.182.189.19 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Abuse, same as above: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Yawning_Infant,_August_2018.jpg&action=history

Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 14:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. 1-day-block as vandalizing SP of blocked User:C22H30N6O4S (above). --Túrelio (talk) 15:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

5.173.19.54

User: 5.173.19.54 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Continue vandalism of blocked users.

Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 15:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. 1-day-block as vandalizing SP of blocked User:C22H30N6O4S (above). --Túrelio (talk) 15:14, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Further sockpuppets:

User: 51.89.95.5 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  1-day-blocked.
User: 94.254.164.20 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  1-day-blocked.
User: 51.89.95.6 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  1-day-blocked.
User: 205.185.127.136 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  1-day-blocked. --Túrelio (talk) 15:18, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Next sockpuppet: ពេជ្រសោភា1 (talk · contribs). Indef'd after uploading the same copyvios as the other accounts. --Túrelio (talk) 17:17, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

詹金麗阿麗師姐

User: 詹金麗阿麗師姐 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: sockpuppets of User:陳妍安 who uploads useless files.

詹金麗

User: 詹金麗 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: sockpuppets of User:陳妍安 who uploads useless files.

胡碧宛

User: 胡碧宛 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: sockpuppets of User:陳妍安 who uploads useless files.

Midleading (talk) 08:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blo0cked and tagged them all. Taivo (talk) 10:37, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Sieghardt Schneider Koller

User: Sieghardt Schneider Koller (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Globally banned user: Wikinger

JavaHurricane 16:57, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Update: account has been globally locked. JavaHurricane 16:59, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Aww man, you spoiled my pizza!

User: Aww man, you spoiled my pizza! (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: VOA, likely block evasion (Pizza for britian)

Hasley 00:03, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Spoiling this section, too.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
✓ Done thanks to AntiCompositeNumber!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

KafferKing

User: KafferKing (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Another sock puppet of Morris Kiyosaki Technique and Morris William Kruger (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  which should be blocked permanently and his ludicrous/pornogrpahic uploads of photos of himself categorizing him as a president or a king be deleted.

Pierre cb (talk) 04:31, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done thanks!!! Ezarateesteban 17:42, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Bank of England King

User: Bank of England King (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Another sock puppet of Morris Kiyosaki Technique and Morris William Kruger (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  which should be blocked permanently and his ludicrous uploads of photos categorizing them as a president or a king be deleted.

Pierre cb (talk) 04:35, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done thanks!!! --Ezarateesteban 17:44, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Raza kashyap

User: Raza kashyap (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Uploads only self portraits. Commons is not a gallery of ones photos. This user should be warned and his photos deleted.

Pierre cb (talk) 14:40, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Last warning left Ezarateesteban 17:46, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Arian.fth

User: Arian.fth (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: account of this user for copy write violation blockedin commons but again this users opened a new account and continue copy write violation with this new account.

[[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 03:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done thanks!! Ezarateesteban 17:48, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Whackties

User: Whackties (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Blocked sock on EN wiki, long-term abuse, see [3]

Citing (talk) 00:59, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done thanks Herby talk thyme 12:31, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

MacieJordan95

User: MacieJordan95 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Block evasion by Joshthemechanic. --BRP ever 00:01, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked by Natuur12. Yann (talk) 14:43, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

RAHMAN SHAHSAVARI KING

User: RAHMAN SHAHSAVARI KING (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Re-Uploads in 2018 of a series of photos of himself, out-of-scope, for self promotion. Most of those photos have been deleted previously and should be again.

Pierre cb (talk) 22:08, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked, files deleted. Yann (talk) 14:49, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

98.254.249.41

User: 98.254.249.41 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: continued vandalism despite warnings.

Hasley 00:23, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for a week. Yann (talk) 14:44, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

CollumsCarner

User: CollumsCarner (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: I don't think they're up to any good, especially with File:Sanjay Bennett The Nonce Leader.jpg (which is a blatant hoax) and File:Mother and son with down syndrome.png. I blocked them on enwiki. Graham87 (talk) 04:45, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 15:05, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

jawiki LTA

User: name hidden (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: An account that attacks jawiki sosop. It is jawiki LTA with a fairly high degree of certainty. アルトクール (talk) 06:27, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Eric R Burce

User: Eric R Burce (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism only account, has been warned twice. --31.61.163.103 06:45, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

31.61.163.103 06:45, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done by Herbythyme. --Yann (talk) 11:18, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

KhKhgdgddududy

User: KhKhgdgddududy (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: User is a sock account for long-time banned editor hopping through wikis canvassing anyone who edits the Horror film article to make edits for them. (see here en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jinnifer/Archive). So far they've followed me to several language wikis, WikiQuote and now Wikimedia commons.

Andrzejbanas (talk) 07:20, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done --Yann (talk) 11:17, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

107.127.53.12

User: 107.127.53.12 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: IP Hopping user trying to get me to change the locked article Horror film on Wikipedia. They have been banned across several wikis to get people to change content for them. They have already previously been banned in this Wiki under the user name KhKhgdgddududy for making basically the same request. If possible, could I have my talk page locked against newly registered users/IPs as well to stop this person? Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done I semi-protected your talk page. The IP (probably dynamic) only made one edit. Yann (talk) 20:12, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Rupisha

User: Rupisha (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Edit test after warning

Stang★ 20:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Indef. Obviously NOTHERE. --Achim55 (talk) 22:57, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

91.106.35.47 ‎

User: 91.106.35.47 ‎ (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: vandalism on AN/B

Stang★ 01:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Blocked by A.Savin for a week. -- CptViraj (talk) 03:39, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

陳畇榛

User: 陳畇榛 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Still upload a same non-free image for different name after warning. CreeperDigital 05:11, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. Herby warned the user. All uploads are deleted. Taivo (talk) 11:44, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

User:Marliojersey

User: Marliojersey (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: evasion of block against User:Kingwarnen Taste1at (talk) 14:05, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Filled RFCU. -- CptViraj (talk) 03:49, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Filed SRG.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:24, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done. I blocked the user indefinitely. If a checkuser confirms, that Marlio is not Jermboy, please notice me. But I did not delete the uploads. Taivo (talk) 11:49, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

70.26.104.217

User: 70.26.104.217 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Adding hey man in Edit page of File:Glass of Milk (33657535532).jpg, edit of 2 jan 2022 03:53‎ JopkeB (talk) 05:19, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

 Not done. In my opinion block is not needed here. You can warn the user. Taivo (talk) 11:51, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Lucasgorelick

User: Lucasgorelick (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Likely a self promotion account as the user name and the photos uploaded are for the same person meeting politicians. Pierre cb (talk) 23:59, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

 Not done. Both uploads were nominated for regular deletion and one of them is speedily deleted. At moment that's enough. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

J3lli

User: J3lli (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: VOA Stang★ 15:50, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

 Not done No account by that name. Yann (talk) 20:08, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
@Yann: account renamed to J3lli, link updated.Stang★ 20:26, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Locked LTA User:J3l leper, I've to go to bed now... --Achim55 (talk) 23:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done. I blocked J3lli indefinitely. All edits are reverted. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

176.54.181.53

User: 176.54.181.53 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: vandalism on multiple images after warning

Stang★ 02:55, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. Stupid vandalism, all reverted. I blocked the IP for 3 days. Taivo (talk) 12:06, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Volleybrawl

User: Volleybrawl (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: File:Flag of Belarus (1918, 1991–1995).svg has been replaced by an inaccurate, swallow-tail version (claimed to be the merchant flag, despite Belarus being a landlocked country), and the file is locked and cannot be reverted to the correct version.

Glide08 (talk) 19:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

@Glide08: ✓ Done, already overwritten.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

何の日はクズ 何の日のインスタ声漏れしててキモすぎ

User: 何の日はクズ 何の日のインスタ声漏れしててキモすぎ (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: jawiki Long time abuse and Cross-wiki vandalism. アルトクール (talk) 07:04, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. Indefinitely blocked by Túrelio. All contributions are deleted. Taivo (talk) 10:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

User:Marsel Ziad

The user behaves strangely, assisted by User:Mohanadkazi. --Ailura (talk) 07:10, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

 Not done. If we do not count uploading selfies, then the user has no edits after September. If you think, that here is a case of sockpuppetry, then you should create a request in COM:RFCU. Taivo (talk) 10:43, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Dritsas

User: Dritsas (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: All changes of the user were reverted. No improvement expected. Arnd (talk) 13:57, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. No activity for more than month. I warned the user and I expect Dritsas to behave better in the future. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

2A06:2EC0:1:0:0:0:0:126

User: 2A06:2EC0:1:0:0:0:0:126 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: vandalism on user talkpage. Stang★ 16:16, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. Blocked for a week and globally locked as well. Taivo (talk) 10:36, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Longngocvu88

User: Longngocvu88 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism-only edit.

Thank you for your time. --Ariadacapo (talk) 12:24, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

I gave them a final warning. --Achim55 (talk) 18:22, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

73.61.8.0/23

✓ Done. 3 days block. Vandalism is reverted. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:04, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Agarzaglobalpeace

 Not done. No activity after you warned him/her. Vandalism is reverted. Taivo (talk) 12:25, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

PopperPeachesCoconut2022

 Not done. Vandalism has stopped after Herby warned Popper. Bytheway, for me VOA means mostly Voice of America and we had even template {{VOA}} for that. Taivo (talk) 12:30, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

117.20.112.0/21

User: 117.20.112.0/21 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: lots of vandalism inside this range, like caption, description etc. Stang★ 21:18, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. Jdx blocked the range in April for 6 months. After the block expired, the vandalism continued. I reblocked the range for year. Taivo (talk) 12:37, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

154.68.5.42

User: 154.68.5.42 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Please help with excessive vandalism here:

✓ Done. 3 days block. Taivo (talk) 12:42, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

That guy, he's creppy,

User: That guy, he's creppy, (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: vandalism

Stang★ 00:43, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done by AntiCompositeNumber. Jianhui67 T★C 08:02, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

jawiki LTA

User: name hidden (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: An account that attacks jawiki sosop. It is jawiki LTA with a fairly high degree of certainty. アルトクール (talk) 12:11, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done thanks Herby talk thyme 12:40, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Socks of Jurisdrew

User: Kuya Juris (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
User: Alta Loira (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
User: Paolos004 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: socks of LTA Jurisdrew. --77.50.104.110 12:28, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done --Yann (talk) 14:28, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

2402:3A80:860:0:0:0:0:0/44

 Not done. Only one edit after July. Taivo (talk) 14:41, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

2600:8807:a40:44:90b8:675d:e15c:a2e

User: 2600:8807:a40:44:90b8:675d:e15c:a2e (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Persistent nasty vandal comments to File:Adam Sandler Cannes 2017.jpg. Looks like a dynamic IP address. Has been warned. WikiPedant (talk) 21:20, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Blocked for 3 days. Thanks for reporting. Ahmadtalk 22:22, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

179.6.160.231

User: 179.6.160.231 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: persistent vandalism despite warning.

Hasley 14:55, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: 3 months, ongoing vandalism since October, 2nd block. --Achim55 (talk) 19:15, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Cookseiko

User: Cookseiko (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Uploading inappropriate images after warning.

Stang★ 17:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done by Herbythyme. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Uglydolls and a Luca.

User: Uglydolls and a Luca. (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism on various file description pages.

Stang★ 19:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

@Stang: ✓ Done, blocked thanks to AntiCompositeNumber and globally locked thanks to Operator873.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:29, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

宿谷谷市

User: 宿谷谷市 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: jawiki abuse user. (w:ja:WP:VIP#相撲関係虚構記事作成荒らし)

アルトクール (talk) 10:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done Jianhui67 T★C 03:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

陳畇榛

User: 陳畇榛 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: STILL UPLOAD NON-FREE FILE, INVAILD WARNING.

CreeperDigital 11:02, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for a week, all files already deleted. --Yann (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

172.58.156.166

User: 172.58.156.166 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Remove legend in File:Klimagürtel-der-erde.svg, final warning given.

Stang★ 15:51, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: IP blocked for 1 day, file semi-protected for 2 weeks. --Achim55 (talk) 16:21, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Pappisman

User: Pappisman (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Self promotion of a singer's albums, photos and label. This users should be banned and his uploads deleted. Pierre cb (talk) 14:42, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. I warned Pappisman and removed self-promo from his user talkpage. All uploads are nominated for deletion. Taivo (talk) 09:35, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Johnnyknox13

User: Johnnyknox13 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: continue upload copyvio images after warning. Stang★ 21:53, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. Blocked for a month, all uploads are deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:37, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

2603:7080:8c06:4e6c:b964:ce79:1d85:8824

User: 2603:7080:8c06:4e6c:b964:ce79:1d85:8824 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: change data in information template, final warning given.

Stang★ 22:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. 3 days block, vandalism is reverted. Taivo (talk) 09:39, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Synthwave.94

User: Synthwave.94 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism in categories. Many users write about it. --Микола Василечко (talk) 20:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

@Микола Василечко: Learn to make the difference between vandalism and useful edits. Synthwave.94 (talk) 20:47, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Many edits are not useful. Completely. You are drawn to this more than once. --Микола Василечко (talk) 20:49, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
What Commons policy or guideline are you referring to here ? "Not useful" is quite vague, and your personal point of view doesn't count here. Synthwave.94 (talk) 20:57, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 Not done. No evidence of vandalism is shown. Taivo (talk) 17:50, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

大戸真司守

User: 大戸真司守 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: jawiki LTA. w:ja:WP:VIP#相撲関係虚構記事作成荒らし or w:ja:LTA:SLIME. アルトクール (talk) 12:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done - thanks for reporting Herby talk thyme 13:02, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Concerns with copyrights of multiple political images: HeminKurdistan

User: HeminKurdistan (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: This editor has published many images from unreliable websites, websites that have a political COI with hosted images, or images with unknown authors, uknown dates of publication, or shady copy-right claims. Most (if not all) of the images make controversial political claims directed at the People's Mujahedin of Iran, a political group with a complicated and bitter feud with the Islamic Republic's theocrats.

I first noticed this image here that made a false copy-right claim. Then checking through the other images uploaded by this user, I noticed similar uploads (like the ones below) with shady copyright claims. Many of these images have been used throughout Wikipedia by (often by topic banned or sockpuppets) editors for spreading political POV.

Habilian which is a thorny source said to be a stated associated media outlet of the Islamic Republic of Iran. See also this from WP:RSN:

TASNIM NEWS uploads, another shady website with strong links to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC):

Iran-interlink another shady website:

PEYKAR.INFO (ibid):

hamneshinbahar.net (ibid):

Mashruteh (ibid):

shahsawandi.com (ibid):

Iran, Resistance on the Rise; A Review of the Recent Resistance Operations of the Mojahedin, Iraq: Pub. Dept of the People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran, 1988, ASIN B004JBUVM8 uploads:

Pbs.twimg.com uploads (see [4]):

VOA uploads of images that don't specify date of publication, author, or are published in any VOA article:

Flickr uploads with shady titles:

iran-ghalam.de:

And there are many more such uploads by this user. Ypatch (talk) 05:46, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

@Ypatch: When reporting an account here, you have to inform the user. I did it for you this time.
Is your report politically motivated? It is not clear what issues you have with these files, e.g. files above from VOA are perfectly OK. Yann (talk) 13:05, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Many of these images do not provide evidence of first date of publication or authors, which makes PD-Iraq or PD-Iran invalid. The uploader has also lied in the past about one of these images being copy-right free. Ypatch (talk) 05:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 Not done. No obvious vandalism here. You can nominate suspect files for regular (not speedy) deletion. Taivo (talk) 15:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

2600:8805:8086:1200::/64

✓ Done. One week block (second block). Taivo (talk) 17:48, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Mayukohimiko

User: Mayukohimiko (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism-only account. File:岸田文雄さん.png, uploaded by this user, was used for vandalism on the Japanese Wikipedia (see ja:Special:diff/87566975). It is highly probable that this account involves sockpuppetry. Dragoniez (talk) 10:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

ファンファンアン

User: ファンファンアン (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: jawiki LTA. w:ja:WP:VIP#相撲関係虚構記事作成荒らし or w:ja:LTA:SLIME. アルトクール (talk) 10:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done Herby talk thyme 11:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

緑の色が好き

User: 緑の色が好き (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: jawiki LTA. w:ja:WP:VIP#相撲関係虚構記事作成荒らし アルトクール (talk) 12:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. Indefinitely blocked, uploads deleted. Taivo (talk) 15:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

2001:E68:540F:8E56::/64

✓ Done. 3 days block. Thanks for reverting! Taivo (talk) 15:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks to De728631 for reverting and to Taivo for blocking!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Nicolás_Orona

User: Nicolás_Orona (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Remove delete template without reason, personal attack. Stang★ 17:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Also nominating userspace pages of others for deletion with vandalistic reasons.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
@Stang: ✓ Done, indeffed thanks to CptViraj!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

37.131.115.151

User: 37.131.115.151 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: blanking Commons:List of meta category criteria after warning. Stang★ 00:54, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done blocked for 31 hours. Jianhui67 T★C 01:13, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

2605:B100:738:B3D4::/64

✓ Done. 3 days block. Taivo (talk) 09:37, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Borneowiki

✓ Done. I do not want to block him yet indefinitely, so one month block. All edits are reverted. Taivo (talk) 09:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Davey2022

User: Davey2022 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Impersonate. Stang★ 18:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Blocked. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 18:18, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Black Bigalow

Can someone have a look at this one? I'm placing a couple of CU blocks on en-wiki for this racist POS. Please run CU also; there's at least four accounts. Drmies (talk) 03:02, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

I have put a CSD tag on the one image they posted. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks. There were four accounts on en-wiki; I placed two range blocks as well. Drmies (talk) 03:12, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Black Bigalow (talk · contribs) has now all contributions deleted. If you claim sockpuppetry, then no evidence is shown. Taivo (talk) 09:37, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Лого мастер2

User: Лого мастер2 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism, harassment — please delete the user's file(s) and block them indefinitely. Aced (talk) 20:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

 Support This user keeps on removing DR tags, see here. --Mosbatho (talk) 20:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done This account was globally locked by Base. I deleted the uploaded file. —RP88 (talk) 21:34, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
RP88 Please do the same with User:Лого мастер3, it seems to be sockpappet A1 (talk) 21:39, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Лого мастер3

User: Лого мастер3 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism, harassment and edit warring here. Please, an admin for action with this case. --Mosbatho (talk) 21:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done blocked indefinitely as a vandalism only account. —RP88 (talk) 21:40, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Лого мастер2

User: Лого мастер2 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Лого мастер3 Please stop User:Лого мастер2 and User:Лого мастер3. Offensive images, harassment. A1 (talk) 21:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done See above. —RP88 (talk) 21:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Лого мастер3

User: Лого мастер3 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Haraasment A1 (talk) 21:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done — blocked indefinitely as a vandalism only account. —RP88 (talk) 21:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

2600:8807:a40:44:f99d:a8ed:67c3:b675

User: 2600:8807:a40:44:f99d:a8ed:67c3:b675 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Repeated nasty vandalism for a period of months, by this IP and variations thereof. Has been active the last couple of days. I'm getting tired of reverting this jerk. If you can't block the first part of the IP address, then please at least put extended protection on his favorite targets. WikiPedant (talk) 04:10, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done /64 blocked 1 year, vandalism seems to be constrained to that range. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 05:25, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Jawiki LTA socks

Socks of ja:Wikipedia:VIP#相撲関係虚構記事作成荒らし. The first account is the uploader of File:1FEC1A3B-30A4-4A9D-8E8F芳賀ルイ15世.jpg, which looks exactly the same as File:岸田文雄さん.png and File:CD8D7岸田文雄さん.jpg (the uploaders have already been blocked). The image uploaded by the first account is used for vandalism on e.g. Special:diff/623254981, and this post involves lyrics in Japanese, which is characteristic of the LTA's posts. --Dragoniez (talk) 07:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Blog 01

User: Blog 01 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: بهترین_آموزش_ارز_دیجیتال, spamming. Stang★ 14:28, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. The user is warned, all spam deleted. Taivo (talk) 10:27, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Diizkid

User: Diizkid (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Spam-only-account, remove link in DR request, cross-wiki abuse. Stang★ 16:38, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. The user is globally locked, all uploads nominated for deletion. I deleted the promotional userpage. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

82.13.179.91

User: 82.13.179.91 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: persistent vandalism, already blocked on enwiki and simplewiki. —Hasley 21:20, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the IP. Edits are reverted. Taivo (talk) 10:33, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

37.163.146.201

User: 37.163.146.201 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Continuous remove no-permission-since template in file File:Vladimir_Čermak_Coach.jpg after warning. Stang★ 22:35, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the IP and reverted it. Taivo (talk) 10:36, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

93.142.76.42

User: 93.142.76.42 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalising userpages [5][6][7]. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:56, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the IP. All edits are reverted. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Cbi_Goverment_india

User: Cbi_Goverment_india (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Spamming. Stang★ 10:28, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the user indefinitely, because this is not an acceptable username. Taivo (talk) 11:01, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

陳畇榛

User: 陳畇榛 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: uploading non-free file after blocks. CreeperDigital 13:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Blocked for a month. -- CptViraj (talk) 15:14, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

191.125.12.229

User: 191.125.12.229 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Lots of clearly incorrect deletion requests, mostly with the reason 'holiday memory of a jerk' in Spanish John Cummings (talk) 11:22, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

 Not done. But most of the nominated files should really be deleted as copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 09:50, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

123.208.211.136

User: 123.208.211.136 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Edit test after warning. Stang★ 11:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Withdrawn, good edit after then. Stang★ 11:42, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Drmcsif

User: Drmcsif (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Spam. Stang★ 15:53, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the user for a week. All spam is deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:54, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

jawiki LTA

User: 徳知事 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  and 御嶽川の河童 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: jawiki LTA. w:ja:WP:VIP#相撲関係虚構記事作成荒らし アルトクール (talk) 10:10, 24 January 2022 (UTC)+1 user --アルトクール (talk) 10:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done thanks Herby talk thyme 11:12, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Joe_Ceb

User: Joe_Ceb (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism only account. Stang★ 19:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Revert, delete and indef block. No need for the CfD either. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:43, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
i did it, i created him from dust, i photoshopped him with my own hand. he is jark, he is great, he is worthy to wield the sword of truth and fight. Joe Ceb (talk) 19:44, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done. I deleted the only upload. At moment that's enough. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Hussain Renu

User: Hussain Renu (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Account created for self-promotion of an India writer. Pierre cb (talk) 04:51, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. All uploads are nominated for deletion. I warned the user. At moment that's enough. Taivo (talk) 11:27, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

ガメ仙人

User: ガメ仙人 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: jawiki LTA. w:ja:WP:VIP#相撲関係虚構記事作成荒らし アルトクール (talk) 12:55, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

File:F46B30AE-2D80-4A64-A8D2-D08FA千代の富士.jpg is COM:CSD#G3 and COM:CSD#G11（parody of a song text）. {{Db}} will be removed.--アルトクール (talk) 13:13, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done thanks Herby talk thyme 13:41, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Ellie Lowton476

User: Ellie Lowton476 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Cross-wiki vandalism, sock of globally locked user User:Mike17Matthews17. Intermediate action while waiting for action from SRG report. Griffinofwales (talk) 11:40, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

@Griffinofwales: ✓ Done, already globally locked.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:13, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

KYFM1990

User: KYFM1990 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Continuing COM:WEBHOST, COM:PORN after two 3-month blocks. Lord Belbury (talk) 16:23, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

 Not done. The user was previously twice blocked due to uploading copyvios. His last uploads were deleted as out of scope. The user is warned and all his uploads are deleted. At moment that's enough. Next porn selfie will result a block. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Cukrakalnis

User: Cukrakalnis (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Nationalistic (more precisely chauvinistic) vandalism on the Category:Grand Duchy of Lithuania against the sources provided on the talk page, where the user failed miserably. Page protection is required (previous requests: here and here). Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 17:40, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Once more, Kazimier Lachnovič is claiming things that are simply not true. Removing Category:History of Belarus from Category:Grand Duchy of Lithuania is not chauvinism, just like removing Category:History of Belarus from Category:Russian Empire would not be nationalistic or chauvinist. Spamming the same sources over and over again and ignoring arguments against those cherry-picked statements is indicative that Kazimier Lachnovič is simply pushing himself a nationalistic agenda and so is blaming that on others.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 17:54, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Grand Duchy of Lithuania 1462 within modern boundaries
The category Category:History of Belarus should be present in Category:Grand Duchy of Lithuania according to reliable sources provided on the category talk page. So it will be present whether or not some disruptive users want it. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 09:13, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Лобачев Владимир is distorting the reality. I am not 'rewriting real history and promoting a fake chauvinist position'. That is visible from the fact that I did not remove Category:Former countries in Belarus, Category:Former countries in Russia and Category:Former countries in Ukraine. Moreover, Лобачев Владимир is lying when he says that his view is backed by "historical, political and territorial data". Furthermore, Лобачев Владимир's writing about the Russian Emperor is absolutely irrelevant, because the Russian Emperor was also titled as the King of Poland at the time. Does that mean that Polish and Lithuanian history is suddenly all Russian? Nonsense. Лобачев Владимир is the one rewriting history, yet accuses others of what he is guilty. Moreover, 'Republic of Lithuania did not originate from the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, but from a part of the Russian Empire' is historically false nonsense, because when the Republic of Lithuania started in 1918, Lithuania was occupied by the Germans (under the rule of the German Empire and thus part of it), so Лобачев Владимир is historically inaccurate. Lithuania was no longer part of the Russian Empire at the time. Лобачев Владимир getting such basic facts wrong shows how he should not be trusted with his other statements concerning history.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 21:13, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. I fully protected the category indefinitely. I'm from Estonia, so I know something about history of Grand Duchy of Lithuania. Cukrakalns, I warn you: you can be blocked, if you continue pushing your non-historical agenda. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Taivo, what non-historical agenda do you have in mind? Did you even notice that both Лобачев Владимир and Kazimier Lachnovič are repeatedly making non-historical statements and claims?--Cukrakalnis (talk) 21:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
I mean your claim that Grand Duchy of Lithuania is not part of history of Belarus. Taivo (talk) 21:55, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

185.50.245.19

User: 185.50.245.19 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Adding meaningless or offensive captions to images. Rsteen (talk) 16:20, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. 3 days block and I reverted one nonsense edit. Taivo (talk) 21:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks Taivo. There are six older ones that are just as pointless. Cheers Rsteen. Rsteen (talk) 04:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
They all were reverted in the past. Taivo (talk) 08:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

180.190.164.130

User: 180.190.164.130 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Removing deletion templates from files, after being warned not to last week. This is presumably sockmaster User:Yuiyui2001 objecting to having their images discussed for deletion. Lord Belbury (talk) 10:13, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. 3 days block. Taivo (talk) 09:12, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

106.1.229.30

User: 106.1.229.30 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Please control this very strange IP user. He seem me a vandal. Thank you. --DenghiùComm (talk) 09:26, 29 January 2022 (UTC) DenghiùComm (talk) 09:26, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. 3 days block and I reverted the edits. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you very much. --DenghiùComm (talk) 09:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

106.203.225.229

User: 106.203.225.229 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Harrasment on Talk Page [8]

Pri2000 (talk) 15:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for 3 days. Yann (talk) 17:26, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Achim55

Achim55 Achim55 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
False claims like earlier reported IP:The user is making false claims against me on my talk page like the earlier reported IP. I feel both are sockpuppet to each other. I'm providing link to that abuse [9][10] This is to notify that he stalked me through different areas. That's why came to know about my real name and my city. And Pra2310 was my earlier username which I changed to Pri2000 due to privacy reasons. For the same reason I didn't used my real name as my username. And the user stalked me and added unnecessary false claims about me in my talk page Pri2000 (talk) 20:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

@Pri2000: I think you are mistaken about the username. Achim55 is an admin, and didn't do anything of what you claim. Yann (talk) 21:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
@Yann: no sir. I came to know that he's admin. But you can see what he made on my talk page. I've provided the links above. I'm providing them again[11][12]. How did he came to know about my real name and city and how did he used the harrasment in the exact way the earlier reported IP did. Adminship doesn't give anyone right to stalk and harass someone through other platforms like the universities where someone study or on Youtube and harass them herePri2000 (talk) 21:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
@Pri2000: No, I think that was an error by Achim55, which was immediately self-reverted. I removed the 2 offending sections from your talk page. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:30, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
I apologize, I misidentified the point of the history the sentence mentioned above was entered. --Achim55 (talk) 21:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

@Achim55: @Yann: sorry sir. But it looked like harrasment like the previously blocked IP. As he personally stalked me. And now harassing me through new IP on his own talk pagePri2000 (talk) 21:33, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

106.203.225.229

User: 106.203.225.229 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Harrasment: The IP now started harassing me from new address. Both are having geolocation in Lucknow. His earlier reported IP harassed and character assassinated me on Wikipedia. After that he got blocked there also. And again he started here.[13] Pri2000 (talk) 21:28, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done Reblocked including talk page. I also deleted that message. Yann (talk) 21:33, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

@Yann: thankyou so much sir for your help.Pri2000 (talk) 21:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

14.49.67.182

User: 14.49.67.182 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: IP editor on a vandalism spree. I think I reverted everything, but they're continuing to deface pages. Eureka Lott 13:59, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Blocked for 3 days. Thanks for cleaning up! --Achim55 (talk) 06:37, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks, @Achim55. More of the same today from 가나1. - Eureka Lott 23:27, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done. Achim blocked the user indefinitely, the edits are reverted. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

John emil hernandez and 191.126.6.132

✓ Done. I deleted speedily the problem file. Let's hope, that this is enough and block is not needed. The IP nominated 4 images for deletion and all the nominations were justified, so I do not block the IP as well. Taivo (talk) 09:28, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done. Unfortunately vandalism continued. Now I blocked John Emil for a week. Taivo (talk) 09:51, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks again!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

89.76.58.36

✓ Done. IP is globally blocked. Only one edit. In my opinion revdel is not needed, I hided edit summary and that's enough. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:05, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

67.81.175.129

User: 67.81.175.129 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Continued disruption of discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Manos rojo and associated images. Clearly a sockpuppet of user whose files are nominated for (User:Manos rojo, who is an LTA on enwiki and also presumably here, and banned globally). See also User:Pieses amarillo. Kinu (talk) 06:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Manos rojo and Pieses amarillo are socks of globally banned user Rgalo10. Please nuke all their uploads as per WMF Global Ban Policy. --188.170.77.165 07:37, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done. I blocked the IP. Both accounts are globally locked and I tagged them. I deleted all their contributions and closed the DR. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
@Taivo: Much appreciated! --Kinu (talk) 17:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

189.169.114.165

User: 189.169.114.165 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: adding inappropriate improper irrelevant contents to Meitei translation of Commons policy and guideline pages. Haoreima (talk) 08:50, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the IP for a week. All edits are reverted. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

141.94.1.96

User: 141.94.1.96 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Continuous harrassment, stalking and character assassination: The user after getting blocked from different IPs is continuously harrassing and stalking me and character assassinating me by saying I cheated him in 2020. Like seriously. I doesn't know who he's. And most importantly I never indulged in any affairs neither in school nor in college now. Then how and why he's stalking, harrassing and character assassinating me for no reason. Sir please save me. It's crossing limits and I'm getting mentally tortured. I'm providing link to that talk [14][15] [16][17]Pri2000 (talk) 11:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. This is serious harassment. I blocked the IP, cleaned your talk page history and semi-protected it for 3 months. Taivo (talk) 12:37, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

@Taivo: thankyou so much sir for this helpPri2000 (talk) 13:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Raj.thakur 95

User: Raj.thakur 95 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Spam-only account. Clearly NOTHERE. 188.170.74.225 07:47, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. Self-promotion-only account. I deleted all his uploads and will block him indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 17:51, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

154.47.103.230

User: 154.47.103.230 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: cross-wiki vandalism. Hasley 14:51, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ blocked for 1 day. --Túrelio (talk) 15:26, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

79.37.97.199

User: 79.37.97.199 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: vandalism despite warning; blocked elsewhere, and obvious reincarnation of 79.21.163.33. —Hasley 14:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Seconded, seems to be asking for a block in this edit.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:39, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done. 3 days block. Taivo (talk) 13:16, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks again!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:29, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

83.168.66.97

User: 83.168.66.97 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Persistent vandalism. See also 83.168.66.18 and its block log. 188.170.73.13 05:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons sucks. Why is this IP not yet blocked? --188.170.76.228 13:14, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done: 1 week. If not sufficient a long term range block willl follow. Achim55 (talk) 13:22, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Jamuelcondez

User: Jamuelcondez (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism-only account. Clearly NOTHERE. 188.170.82.46 07:04, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. Achim warned the user one more time. One more inappropriate edit means here block. Taivo (talk) 14:26, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

47.234.198.142

✓ blocked for 3 months, as this IP seems to be a stable vandalism-"account". --Túrelio (talk) 15:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
@Túrelio: Thanks again!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:28, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Mr.roopz

 Not done. Only one edit. You warned him twice. That's enough. Taivo (talk) 14:29, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
@Taivo: His edits today on this page look like spam (same thing many times).   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:13, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done. One day block. Taivo (talk) 15:25, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks again!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:17, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Workshop_for_blue_people

User: Workshop_for_blue_people (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Promotion, vandalism on description page. Stang★ 15:29, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

@Stang: ✓ Done, blocked thanks to AntiCompositeNumber!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:45, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

第七屆立法會

User: 第七屆立法會 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism-only account. Sockpuppet: 218.103.162.252 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) . SCP-2000 11:45, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. The user is indefinitely blocked and the IP was blocked as well. All edits of the IP are reverted. Taivo (talk) 12:40, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

76.169.161.11

User: 76.169.161.11 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: unconstructive edits on description page. Stang★ 17:33, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the IP, all edits are reverted. Taivo (talk) 13:05, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

76.169.161.11

User: 76.169.161.11 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: LTA / cross-wiki vandalism. FlyingAce (talk) 03:02, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the IP, all edits are reverted. Taivo (talk) 13:06, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Manishrajputphotography

User: Manishrajputphotography (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Uploading images with spam links and text in the summaries, after a warning to stop advertising. Lord Belbury (talk) 20:21, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done Indef. Yann (talk) 20:29, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Ronaldo Samuel Ruhulessin

User: Ronaldo Samuel Ruhulessin (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Uploading banner images to advertise their guitar lessons, after being asked to stop. Lord Belbury (talk) 20:33, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done Indef. Yann (talk) 06:39, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

I_forgot_to_pass,_still,_shake_those_booobiess!

User: I_forgot_to_pass,_still,_shake_those_booobiess! (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism. Clearly here not to make an encyclopedia. Skmp (talk) 00:09, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done both blocked --Didym (talk) 00:21, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

105.239.36.213

User: [[:User:|]] ([[:User talk:|talk]] · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: ~~ — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 105.239.36.213 (talk) 01:31, 4 February 2022‎ (UTC)

Evidently self-reporting.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:26, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Nuthin' on the range, nuthin' in deleted contribs, nuthin' to do here. If they decide to actually vandalize, they can drag themselves back. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: In these cases, just revert. Thanks, Yann (talk) 05:52, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
@Yann: mkay.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:42, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

219.79.98.119

User: 219.79.98.119 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism. Cross-wiki abuse [18].
SCP-2000 15:53, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for 3 days. Yann (talk) 17:16, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Fortniteballsimgayilikemen

User: Fortniteballsimgayilikemen (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Not HTBAE Skmp (talk) 19:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

I should hope not, since Commons isn't an encyclopedia. ✓ Blocked for the username and the disruptive uploads. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 05:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Pimiento picante

User: Pimiento picante (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: [19] Protection of file preferred against sockpuppets of user RGalo10. Mtattrain (talk) 04:30, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Blocked and nuked, and the other one too. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 05:00, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

123.208.211.136

User: 123.208.211.136 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalism (LTA?), see AFlog. Stang★ 11:23, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. Blocked for a year due to long-time abuse. Taivo (talk) 16:24, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

MrsMantunku

User: MrsMantunku (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Upload unfree files after two blocks. Stang★ 12:52, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked her for 3 months and deleted all her uploads. Taivo (talk) 17:09, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

CalidadFiles

User: CalidadFiles (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Continuing to upload many unrelated press/publicity shots of celebrities as their own work, after a warning to stop. Lord Belbury (talk) 08:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. Considering large number of copyvios and 0% of good uploads, I blocked the user for a month and will delete his/her all uploads. Taivo (talk) 11:33, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

千村ミヨコ

User: 千村ミヨコ (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Long term abuse. Vandalism-only account.
SCP-2000 09:56, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Globally locked. SD hehua (talk) 11:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

63.143.199.179

User: 63.143.199.179 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: globally banned user Rgalo10. Hasley 19:15, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done by User:Ymblanter. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:56, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Talya85

User: Talya85 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Repeatedly uploading the same band/album copyvios. Lord Belbury (talk) 12:35, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Blocked for a week. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:46, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

47.234.198.142

✓ TPA revoked. -- CptViraj (talk) 13:40, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
@CptViraj: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:12, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Disney90

User: Disney90 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Uploading copyrighted images with instructions for how to set up a streaming service, but with a scam URL link as the source. Presumably hoping to trick people who are searching online for how to set up their Disney+. Lord Belbury (talk) 10:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. The user is warned, all uploads are deleted as copyvios. If (s)he continues, then (s)he must be blocked. Taivo (talk) 11:13, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

83.168.66.97

User: 83.168.66.97 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Persistent vandalism. See Special:PermanentLink/626591558#83.168.66.97. --188.170.85.199 17:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC) 188.170.85.199 17:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done: Blocked for 2 weeks 1 month. Thanks for notifying! --Achim55 (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Fahadharbi

User: Fahadharbi (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Adding copyrighted images by uploading to existent free images Flix11 (talk) 03:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. I warned the user – (s)he was not warned yet. Also I deleted speedily multiple copyvios. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Ethanholda

User: Ethanholda (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Content(i.e. source) removal after warning. Stang★ 23:49, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

These works are no longer owned by the Cleveland Museum of Art, so I am correcting the metadata. Ethanholda (talk) 00:00, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
IF there is some other way I should be doing this, please let me know. Ethanholda (talk) 00:01, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Firstly, I apologize for my somehow rough rollback. In my opinion, even if these collections is "no longer owned by the Cleveland Museum of Art", it is not recommended for you to simply remove the information about them - you can make some changes to its statement, like "it was owned by...". I see that the link to the source is currently HTTP 404, but since it is still available on the web archive, it makes sense for me to keep it. Stang★ 00:09, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 Withdrawn at here, this is not a vandalism. Stang★ 00:10, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

172.197.56.72

User: 172.197.56.72 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Vandalizes various file pages with strange edits which cannot be understood. Ellywa (talk) 22:02, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

dELETED - I replied on the wrong thread Ethanholda (talk) 23:59, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 Not done. No edits, living or dead, for more than month. Taivo (talk) 08:40, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

NoodleChang

User: NoodleChang (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting:  It looks like a duck to me:陳畇榛. CreeperDigital 12:00, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

The two files have been deleted since. Thanks. Krinkle (talk) 16:57, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

154.47.97.107

User: 154.47.97.107 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: vandalism Stang★ 13:37, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

@Stang: ✓ Done, thanks for the reports! Blocked & locked thanks to CptViraj & Martin Urbanec!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:42, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

AmberSkyes

User: AmberSkyes (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: User continue remove {{Copyvio}} tag in File:Sara_Evans_in_The_53rd_Annual_CMA_Awards.jpg after warning give. Stang★ 14:11, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

The user also removed the above post in this edit with Summary "Yo no debería estar en esta categoría ver que tengo que hacer para por derecho de autor adecuados para mi foto?", translated as "I should not be in this category to see what I have to do for right copyright for my photo?".   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:38, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done. Blocked for a day. Taivo (talk) 09:09, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:49, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

تلاتخناا غير فيها

✓ Done. Globally locked. Taivo (talk) 10:12, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:14, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Diana armogan

User: Diana armogan (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Adding nonsense to talk pages. The Jewpacabra (talk) 18:59, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked her for a week. Taivo (talk) 12:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

LasBrandos

User: LasBrandos (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: personal attacks [20][21] after his previous account got blocked on deWP [22]. Similar attacks by this block evasion were revision deleted on deWP [23]. Johannnes89 (talk) 21:41, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked the user indefinitely for intimidation/harassment. Taivo (talk) 12:18, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Bandi3534

User: Bandi3534 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Upload Copyrighted images even after being warned numerous times. All his/her images should be deleted immediately and the account blocked. Pierre cb (talk) 04:15, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done Last warning sent, all files already deleted. Yann (talk) 10:54, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

63.143.194.0/24

User: 63.143.194.0/24 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Trolling/vandalism – globally banned user Rgalo10. The Jewpacabra (talk) 10:35, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for 3 months. Yann (talk) 10:53, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

198.17.32.214

✓ Done. 3 days block. Taivo (talk) 08:37, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
@Taivo: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:01, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
@Taivo: Also 34.99.95.18 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) .   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:19, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you, I blocked the IP as well. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Lolagpk35

User: Lolagpk35 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: This user used Commons to attempt a "sneaky" Moroccan nationalist POV-pushing vandalism on the article about Africa of the Wikipedia in French. They created low-quality versions of maps of Africa from Commons (without credit) (1, 2) with countries of the continent without the Western Sahara Territory. While most of it has been occupied and integrated de facto within Morocco over time, the conflict is still ongoing and the original maps reflect the current opinion of the United Nations (1, 2).

They also erased mentions of this territory in the article content that isn't from Commons, but I reported it on the local AN already (original diff). J. N. Squire (talk) 16:44, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. User is warned. You can nominate his uploads for regular (not speedy) deletion. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

BouwMaster

User: BouwMaster (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Five full years of copyvio logo uploads, with three final warnings and one past block. Lord Belbury (talk) 22:24, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done. I blocked him for a month, deleted speedily some copyvios and nominated one for deletion. Taivo (talk) 10:36, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

2600:6C48:767F:9391::/64

User: 2600:6C48:767F:9391::/64 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: remove npd template after warning. Stang★ 02:30, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

@Stang ✓ Done Files deleted, account blocked 1 month for persistent copyvio, IP blocked 3 days. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:58, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Don-kun

User: Don-kun (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting: Please delete the user's page, as it violates COM:USERPAGE: User page should not express hatred of or vilify others. Maybe a block should be also applied (I prefer leaving a colleague admin dealing with this matter, this time, being myself the one attacked). Thank you! Ruthven (msg) 19:53, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

I recieved a "thank you" notification from Ruthven for this edit. Which makes it #1 weird that he now thinks the action he thanked for is something bad #2 was a further act of harassment against me after he had already pushed me out of this project. "Thanking" to someone for leaving after beeing bullied - in a way only they see and no one else - is actually pretty villain-like. Also demanding the deletion of the whole page and not just removing a sentence he has problems with aims to make my contributions here less visible and is an act of harassment. If this would be about my statements about Ruthven, deleting the whole page would be unnecessary. Don-kun (talk) 20:47, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
@Don-kun It was a kind way to notify you that you violated (again) our guidelines. Hoping that you did something about it without having to act. But you preferred to ignore it. No surprise, given your past behaviour. Ruthven (msg) 21:14, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
This explanation is a joke. And your answer is defamatory (again, as always). Don-kun (talk) 08:13, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done. I deleted the userpage. All users must be polite and nice towards each other. This userpage was not such. I do not block Don-kun, because on the now-deleted userpage (s)he expressed wish to leave Commons indefinitely. Of course, this is not obligatory. Don-kun can always come back (even today) and continue working productively, can even recreate userpage, if this is not attacking anybody. But such userpage is not allowed. Taivo (talk) 10:10, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
@Ruthven: Hmm, COM:USERPAGE at the top states that The Commons community has rejected this guideline, policy, or process. So how can anyone violate it? --The Jewpacabra (talk) 10:18, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
@The Jewpacabra you can check Commons:Blocking policy ("Harassment: Accounts and IP addresses which are used primarily to create a hostile environment for another user may be blocked."). About the user page, you have your answer at Commons:Project_scope (Non-allowable user page content: Content that does not advance Commons' aims, including ...anything apparently created and/or uploaded for the purpose of vandalism or attack) They are both official guidelines. Ruthven (msg) 12:13, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
@Ruthven: So why did you say that the page (I haven't seen it) violates COM:USERPAGE??? BTW. COM:BP and COM:PSP are not guidelines, they are policies. So, as far as I understand, they are more important documents than guidelines because everyone must follow policies while everyone (only) should follow guidelines. BTW2. It doesn't seem that Don-kun's account is used primarily to create a hostile environment for another user. --The Jewpacabra (talk) 12:35, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Taivo was already involved in the original incident and is now complicit in covering up why I left. Just another act of bullying by this group of admins - as is the unnecessary deletion of a page that almost exclusively showed my contributions to this project whithout any violation of rules just because of some sentences they have problems with. Don-kun (talk) 18:32, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Vandalism/Archive_16&oldid=630802671"