Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism/Archive 9

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

198.49.31.131

Resolved

jdx Re: 16:47, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:50, 1 July 2016 (UTC)


185.3.146.206

Resolved

jdx Re: 19:35, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

I've blocked this one. Over the past couple days we've had a bunch of attacks on Geagea and Hanay from Israeli ranges. If 185.3.146.0/24 keeps up, I could try out a week or so rangeblock. The other 46.19.83.0/24, 46.19.84.0/23, 46.19.85.0/24, and 46.19.86.0/24 ranges where the attacks on Gia and Hanay have come from are mobile ranges, but a short rangeblock of those might be feasible if absolutely necessary. INeverCry 19:48, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
46.19.85.240 has became active. --jdx Re: 20:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
I've done some 3-day soft rangeblocks to see if we can get rid of this vandal. INeverCry 20:12, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Thank you INeverCry. This is User:יעל י that was blocked indefinitely in Hebrew wikipedia and was declared as a troll. Now she his here try to harassing me and vandalized pictures. Hanay (talk) 20:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

5.22.130.108

Resolved

Hanay (talk) 17:57, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

it is the same person as yesterday 185.3.146.206. User:יעל י Hanay (talk) 17:59, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done--Steinsplitter (talk) 18:05, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
@Hanay: I looked a bit deeper into it, a question: יעל י = JHistory = the aforementioned ip's? --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
@Steinsplitter: , You are right this is the same person. Hanay (talk) 18:22, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
The edits (especially the last ones) are the same (reverts), I blocked JHistory for block evasion (יעל י, & ip's). --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:26, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
The rabbit hole always goes deeper and deeper... INeverCry 18:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Oh dears, you are perfectly right! Please block also me. (I have more than 1000 users). Or maybe you want to ask WHY. Some other time... Elad34 (talk) 18:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Blocked as well. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:45, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
@Elcobbola: @Magog the Ogre: @Trijnstel: This I have more than 1000 users claim above is a bit concerning. INeverCry 18:51, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Definitely, but CU isn't that helpful here I'm afraid. Trijnsteltalk 20:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
BTW, יעל י is a known sockpuppeteer and since a few days globally locked as well. Trijnsteltalk 20:40, 2 July 2016 (UTC)


ArianSKinn

Resolved

Schniggendiller (talk) 19:42, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:50, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

(username removed)

Resolved

Hanay (talk) 13:01, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

See (username removed) please dlete also the user page and protect it. Thanks. Hanay (talk) 13:17, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:39, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
@Steinsplitter: Thank you for blocking her. But the page with the abusive name is still exists. So the problem is not resolved completely. Could you please delete the talk page and the user page and protect it. She is doing it so this page will be found in google search. Thanks. Hanay (talk) 14:48, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
@Hanay: Done. I asked the stewards to hide the account globally. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:16, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Hanay (talk) 15:24, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

109.154.251.113

Resolved
  • User: 109.154.251.113 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
  • Reasons for reporting: REASON. This IP (it keeps changing) is once again going through image files and destroying the indexing which sorts images into categories and ties images of the same object together. It is clear that it is malicious because the behaviour comes each time from a new IP. Is it possible to do a block revert? Would I be permitted to do that?

Eddaido (talk) 01:13, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

User:Eddaido, why did you revert inserted categories like Category:1949 automobiles? In my opinion they were useful. Taivo (talk) 06:42, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Because I have spent many hours with this IP on previous occasions fixing these things properly and asking (him) to cease and desist and as you can see without success. As the IP is giving me lots of pain and acting quite thoughtlessly I thought a little pain as a reward might be appropriate. He carefully deletes my edits, I don't care about the edits you mention, just about the IP removing my hard-won information (as used in my edits). Fixing to leave in the edits you mention would take a very long time. OK? Angrily but not with Taivo, Eddaido (talk) 10:58, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
I sense doubt. The year of manufacturer and (where necessary) licence plate number I add to the sort function on individual images means they are viewed within that category in order of year manufactured and, where there is more than one image of the same car, the licence plate groups them together. I have no objection at all to the IP adding the image to, say Category:1940 automobiles. I do strongly object to the apparently targeted removal of my sort codes. Yes it is possible for a reader to not understand what they are or why they are there but to simply remove them without reference to anyone else is surely vandalism.

I have just found you have blocked that particular IP. Thank you. Do I have to do the reinstatements one by one? Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 04:30, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Yes, it would be better to categorize the cars per year also (or at least not to remove these categories). Taivo (talk) 06:53, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Can no-one help me? Eddaido (talk) 11:22, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
@Eddaido: I granted you rollback rights, so you can *one click* revert bad edits. But there are also edits which are looking fine. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:06, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, I did not realize, that you asked rollbacker rights that way. You must speak more straightforward to me. Taivo (talk) 21:23, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Thank you Steinsplitter. Thank you Taivo, I did not realise that was what I was asking for, I just hoped someone might be able to help. My best wishes to you both, Eddaido (talk) 00:04, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Federico Bravo 60

Resolved
Uploads nuked, user blocked. INeverCry 17:53, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. Btw, just to complete my report... After a control, I found a crosswiki spam. The page it:Max Man, deleted three times, was created by him. Thanks again for your intervention. --Dэя-Бøяg 17:55, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

158.129.160.4

Resolved

jdx Re: 10:54, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done--Steinsplitter (talk) 11:30, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
I insist on blocking the whole subnet for a week or two: Special:Contributions/158.129.160.63. --jdx Re: 15:06, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Another one: Special:Contributions/158.129.160.62. --jdx Re: 15:57, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

128.70.29.216

Resolved

jdx Re: 17:24, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Blocked & copyvio deleted. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:28, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

82.35.113.43

Resolved

jdx Re: 21:16, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Blocked for 1 week. --Achim (talk) 21:22, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

User:Bjgtjhfg

Resolved

I’m actually not sure, but this looks questionable to me: User page: Special:PermaLink/199755765 and even more:

— Speravir_Talk – 00:41, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

VOA-blocked. INeverCry 00:44, 12 July 2016 (UTC)


Markt2727

Resolved

Grand-Duc (talk) 07:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

109.242.169.139

Resolved

jdx Re: 11:23, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Looks like πρώτη σερρών. Blocked both IPs for 1 week. --Achim (talk) 14:08, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Tinshy

Resolved

jdx Re: 21:48, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:32, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Now globally locked as well. INeverCry 06:34, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

ΟΑΣΘ

Resolved

jdx Re: 14:25, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done--Steinsplitter (talk) 17:06, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

178.33.148.28

Resolved

jdx Re: 16:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done--Steinsplitter (talk) 17:04, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

126.5.24.233

Resolved

--DAJF (talk) 11:49, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Blocked by Steinsplitter. INeverCry 16:51, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

IsaSaca20

Resolved

-WayKurat (talk) 09:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC) }}

User warned. No evidence of previous copyright related warnings found (one scope-related DR notice and nothing else). @WayKurat: when tagging files as copyright violations, please make sure you inform the user as required. This is automated if you use Help:QuickDelete. Storkk (talk) 10:37, 16 July 2016 (UTC)


178.33.141.170

Resolved

jdx Re: 16:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Done. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

126.5.24.233

Resolved

--DAJF (talk) 03:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Blocked for 3mo. INeverCry 03:24, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Jvip

Resolved

Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 19:44, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Indef-blocked as a serial copyvio uploader. I've nuked the rest of their surviving uploads as obvious copyvios. INeverCry 20:10, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

158.129.160.83

Resolved

jdx Re: 03:09, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 03:42, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Spam or vandalism: Quickbooks

Resolved

A lot of new users uploading random pictures or pictures linked to Quickbooks with always a big description with phone numbers and repeated words.

By searching on Google a extract of the description, it seems that many wikis and user contents websites have been polluted by this flood.

Regards, Lacrymocéphale (talk) 22:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

@INeverCry: you seems to follow the thread. Thank you. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 23:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
I'm working on it, deleting spam and blocking accounts. @Magog the Ogre: CU may be handy here. These accounts are all posting the same spammy uploads as the ones listed above. INeverCry 23:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
@INeverCry: Offnfopt (thank him) has reported a bot list on my original post @ Commons:Village_pump#Spam or vandalism: Quickbooks if you need.--Lacrymocéphale (talk) 23:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
I've doubled his list and deleted a huge number of spam images, copyvios, and pages. @Magog the Ogre: , @Trijnstel: , @Krd: , @Elcobbola: This service/spammer is doing Quickbooks, Netgear, and several others. So far I've blocked about 30 accounts and a /19 range; the list is available at Commons:Village_pump#Spam or vandalism: Quickbooks. At least a half dozen or so of these accounts were created while I was doing blocks and deletions. INeverCry 00:01, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Still ongoing. I've blocked a couple more... INeverCry 00:08, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
This guy has been around for a while, and uses technical means so that it is impossible to track him, unfortunately. His socks have gotten mixed in with Category:Sockpuppets of Nitin dippy, although I'm not sure they are all the same person. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:18, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. He kept me busy for about an hour... INeverCry 01:31, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Still at it with Kukurmutta2... INeverCry 03:01, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

@INeverCry, Magog the Ogre, Trijnstel, Krd, and Elcobbola: Here it come again: File:Netgear router customer service number.jpg (boring...) --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 12:00, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Also: Sgjymsd (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  --jdx Re: 13:02, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
@INeverCry, Magog the Ogre, Trijnstel, Krd, and Elcobbola: Also:
It seems that CAPTCHA is needed for new users... --jdx Re: 13:22, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
A search string to find some of this vandalism: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&limit=50&search=%22tech+support+phone+number%22 --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:13, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Created Special:AbuseFilter/155 for now. Should be disabled when all op ranges are checkuser-blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:38, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
@Steinsplitter: Lullu121verma (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
looks like the same guy. --jdx Re: 15:07, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
It is the same, blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:09, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Benedictokoji

Resolved

CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 13:45, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

One single test edit on Commons. I left a note on their talk page, that's enough for now. --Achim (talk) 14:35, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Vandalism is now called "test edit"? This was not marked as a test. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 14:57, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Vandalism is predicated upon intent as well as effect. In the absence of evidence of bad intent, for an edit that does no harm to the image, we would assume good faith until a contrary intention is shown. FWIW I has about to add virtually the same comment as Achim55 but was edit-conflicted. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:51, 23 July 2016 (UTC)


97.41.1.47

Resolved

★ Poké95 06:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:26, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

79.254.74.226

Resolved

jdx Re: 09:15, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:18, 25 July 2016 (UTC)


Fotochronist

Resolved
  • User: Fotochronist (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
  • Reasons for reporting: After I pointed him towards some guidelines and corrected some of his categorizations that contradict the guidelines, Fotochronist suddenly has started to add pointless deletion requests to many of his own files, stating that he has stopped his collaboration because he was "bullied". He also removes categories from his files without a reason. He has never answered the suggestions that me and another user posted to his talk page. Please close his deletion requests and stop him from causing further harm.

Sitacuisses (talk) 13:55, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

I gave him a final warning, next time block. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:42, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
@Fotochronist: Could you please help with cleaning up the mess? Thanks. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:48, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Everything I have seen from him was in German, including categories, so I guess that limited command of the English language may be part of the problem. --Sitacuisses (talk) 14:56, 25 July 2016 (UTC)


Analisac Ior

Resolved

-WayKurat (talk) 03:00, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Sock blocked & tagged, & uploads nuked. INeverCry 05:00, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Collins2000

Resolved

jdx Re: 14:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Blocked indef for spamming. INeverCry 17:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Cole2425

Resolved

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 19:42, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Acct blocked, uploads nuked. INeverCry 20:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

SuperTrump

Resolved

HubbellJoe

Resolved

Bossanoven (talk) 23:24, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

User VOA blocked, and the Kevin Durant category history cleaned. INeverCry 00:26, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

1Katero1

Resolved

Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 06:24, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

He's been given a final warning, and no uploads since. Further copyvio uploads will warrant a block. INeverCry 20:11, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

87.105.137.253

Resolved

jdx Re: 19:45, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

I've done a 1-day block, but that may not be very effective. INeverCry 20:09, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

EditsOrArticles & Guycn2

Resolved
Thank you @Christian Ferrer: I thought about having them both blocked for a short time to calmly understand what had happened but you seems to have already pick the right one to block. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 22:16, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
I'm really sorry to see that you thought of blocking ME, instead of appreciating my struggle against that troll. Guycn2 · ☎ 22:20, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Does it mean I should've just let him keep vandalizing, in order to avoid edit warring? Guycn2 · ☎ 22:33, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks Christian Ferrer and INeverCry. The user have more sockpuppets. We may see them her. -- Geagea (talk) 22:24, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
@Guycn2: I'm sorry for that but you kind of struggle the wrong way. As an external, it was hard to determine what was happening. I thought about blocking you both for ten minutes or less just to read out the events. It would have end up the them way. The next time you're trolled, you shouldn't try to revert all the troll editions and concentrate on the necessary (which is probably this page). Like in a bar fight, I thought about having the opponents separated before hearing their testimonies. As you can see, I kind of help you, my demande was treated and a good choice was made. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 22:36, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the response. Next time I'm trolled, I'll try to struggle better. Regards, Guycn2 · ☎ 22:39, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
@Guycn2: It's complicated to have the good reaction when dealing with trolls. You weren't too bad. I've done worst, by the past, with total loss of temper. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 22:59, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
I guess the best way to deal with it in this case would be requesting to block him, and rollbacking all of his edits only after he's been blocked. The problem is that he'd probably vandalize this page as well. Guycn2 · ☎ 23:01, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

2a00:1370:812d:131e:ac3d:b981:51e:5464

Resolved

jdx Re: 10:42, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

OK, @Sealle has blocked him. However it would be nice to hide a comment (or delete the whole war) in File:42 Неподалеку от Голубого озера.JPG – Russian "hidden" means "hidden" --jdx Re: 11:26, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
If you consider it worthy rev-deletion, why then do you cite it here, English translation included? Just curious... --A.Savin 11:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Because Russian is not lingua franca on Commons. And this topic will be archived in a few days and only determined people will be able to find it. --jdx Re: 11:50, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
You miss the point... --A.Savin 11:52, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Personal data/insults won't be hidden just because the page is getting archived. Thus it is better not to translate such stuff on AN. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism and legal threats

Resolved
✓ Done The guy's on a mobile range, so we'll probably hear from him again soon. I've hidden the edits and protected the affected files for now. INeverCry 00:16, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

2607:fb90:22ca:9bdb:0:4f:a25a:fe01

Resolved

jdx Re: 10:09, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done I blocked him for a week, because he wanted, that his edits were not reverted during a week. Jdx reverted all his edits. Taivo (talk) 14:29, 4 August 2016 (UTC)


غياث العرودكي

Resolved

غياث العرودكي (talk) 18:41, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked. INeverCry 19:15, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

غياث العرودكي

Resolved
Because you deserve it.غياث العرودكي (talk) 19:10, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, just quit the bullshit already and block me.غياث العرودكي (talk) 19:10, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked. INeverCry 19:15, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

78.10.135.248

Resolved

jdx Re: 12:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Ooops, Rosenzweig has blocked him while I was writing this report. --jdx Re: 12:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppets of Itailevi00

Resolved
August 2016
May 2016
February 2016
May/June2015
April 2015
✓ Done Socks blocked and tagged, uploads deleted. INeverCry 22:21, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks a lot ;-) . --Dэя-Бøяg 22:23, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
@DerBorg: There's a lot more socks of this sockmaster than the ones listed above. Have a look at this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&username=itail&group=&limit=100. I'll get to work on the blocks and any deletions that're needed. INeverCry 22:26, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
@DerBorg: A few more here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&username=Itai&group=&limit=100. It looks like we've got them all blocked and tagged for the moment. I did a few more deletions as well. INeverCry 22:52, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
OMG! A case of compulsory sockpuppeteer!? ;-) Thanks a lot for the work. --Dэя-Бøяg 23:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Anyway, I linked this other SP on meta, requesting another global lock. The others were still blocked by MarcoAurelio. Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 00:07, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
@INeverCry: ... Globally locked (by Ruslik) also the SP found by you. --Dэя-Бøяg 19:47, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
@DerBorg: Sounds good. Thanks for doing the footwork. Special:ListUsers is one of my main tools for finding socks BTW. INeverCry 20:12, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
I'll remember. Greets :) --Dэя-Бøяg 03:02, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

85.16.96.2

Resolved

Jack-ONeill55 (talk) 09:01, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

I've hidden the comment and blocked the IP for a day. INeverCry 20:09, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

126.5.20.231

Resolved

--DAJF (talk) 05:05, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Blocked for 3 months as a static IP. He's all across a /16 range, so a rangeblock isn't possible since I don't have CU to check for collateral. INeverCry 05:15, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

361szm

Resolved

jdx Re: 16:40, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Uploads nuked, sock globally locked. INeverCry 20:54, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

119.104.119.99

Resolved

jdx Re: 15:03, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done I semi-protected the file for a year. Vandalism is reverted. Taivo (talk) 18:48, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

105.137.248.244

Resolved

jdx Re: 12:04, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Blocked 3 months. --M0tty (talk) 12:45, 13 August 2016 (UTC)


Andrew Benton 69

Resolved

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 03:02, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

VOA blocked and uploads nuked. INeverCry 04:14, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

188.180.122.81

Resolved

jdx Re: 09:00, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked 3days --A.Savin 09:37, 16 August 2016 (UTC)


Szm2010

Resolved

jdx Re: 14:29, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Achim55 has dealt with this one. INeverCry 17:05, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Lukauluka

Resolved
Note: anyway, I'll watch the C.A.. He seems to be a Serbo-Croatian speaker, and indeed he's logged on sh and sr wikis (without contribs). If he'll start vandalizing there, I'll request a global block. Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 21:19, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Blocked. INeverCry 21:32, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks again. Btw, I requested a global lock... Just to avoid eventual future vandalisms to Serbian and Serbo-Croatian Wikipedias. --Dэя-Бøяg 22:16, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Alysso Ledger

Resolved
@Wikicology: Uploads all appear to to have been prior to the first warning... might been simple cluelessness. I don't think a block is appropriate unless the behavior continues. Please keep watching, though. Reventtalk 16:55, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Thank you, Revent. Wikicology (talk) 16:57, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

85.11.164.207

Resolved

★ Poké95 01:31, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked the /20 for 6 months and the acct as a VOA. INeverCry 03:53, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

158.129.160.92

Resolved

jdx Re: 06:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

158.129.128.0/18 blocked for 3 months. INeverCry 06:06, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

117.24.123.12

Resolved

jdx Re: 11:09, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done--Steinsplitter (talk) 11:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

174.70.49.194

Resolved

jdx Re: 11:21, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Blocked--Steinsplitter (talk) 11:30, 25 August 2016 (UTC)


66.37.226.196

Resolved

jdx Re: 05:51, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Blocked for 2 years. INeverCry 06:07, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

178.122.119.190

Resolved

jdx Re: 06:08, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

178.122.0.0/16 blocked for 3 days. INeverCry 06:19, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Eygenart

Pending

Einsamer Schütze (talk) 19:57, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

+1 user eygenart is a single-purpose/ throw-awy account, obviously created today for deletion requests only. see difflinks: [2] [3] [4] There is not a single edit, that is forwarding the project. Difflink 2 shows, that he is in it for commerial reasons only, without any doubt. Please block user eygenart infinte. --Foreign Species (talk) 20:49, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

I blocked him indefinitely as vandalism-only account, because he continued after warning. Taivo (talk) 06:57, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
I unblocked Eygenart per Mattbuck's request on my talkpage. I blocked him, because (s)he did not stop before nominating every file in category:Ukranenland for deletion. Mattbuck suggested unblock, because (s)he stopped 2 minutes after warning. Taivo (talk) 16:40, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 Info I closed the DR (with a big keep of course) today. I recommend to keep this thread pending for a couple of days and see what happens. IMHO the user needs help, I don't think there was any malice involved. My two cents. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

2602:306:cf43:9850:227c:8fff:fee8:b16c

Resolved

jdx Re: 02:34, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

I've blocked the /64 for a week. I've hidden the edits and reported them to oversight. INeverCry 04:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)


172.251.48.223

Resolved

jdx Re: 07:39, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

172.251.48.0/24 blocked for a few days. Edits hidden - will report them to OS. INeverCry 07:49, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

172.58.24.16

Resolved

jdx Re: 12:29, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done--Steinsplitter (talk) 13:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Soteriaspace

Resolved

jdx Re: 19:38, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Blocked. INeverCry 19:42, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

36.81.3.61

✓ Done

jdx Re: 11:31, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

blocked for 3 days, feel free to change it. --Achim (talk) 12:43, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

126.5.26.119

✓ Done

--DAJF (talk) 13:07, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Blocked for 3 days. Thanks for notifying. --Achim (talk) 18:10, 10 September 2016 (UTC)


Gioannania1821

✓ Done

jdx Re: 18:26, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Blocked MorganKevinJ(talk) 22:34, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

172.80.36.77

Resolved

jdx Re: 13:09, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for a month. INeverCry 20:53, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Dikgosi Sejabodile

Resolved

jdx Re: 16:12, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

This was fast. --jdx Re: 16:18, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Sri Sri 108 Baba Jharkhand Nath

Resolved

Magnus (talk) 08:07, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 20:02, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

76.79.153.202

Resolved

jdx Re: 08:27, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done I blocked the IP for a year and now I am going to hide some revisions. Taivo (talk) 09:37, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

78.40.232.83

Resolved

jdx Re: 09:00, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done I blocked the IP for a week and semi-protected flag of Fatah for a year. Taivo (talk) 09:35, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

193.219.132.135

Resolved

jdx Re: 11:08, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for a month. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:21, 16 September 2016 (UTC)


SUBHASH CHAND SAINI

Resolved

jdx Re: 14:14, 16 September 2016 (UTC)


193.219.54.101

Resolved

jdx Re: 14:50, 16 September 2016 (UTC)


208.131.186.123

Resolved

jdx Re: 22:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

208.131.160.0/19 soft-blocked for 1 month. INeverCry 23:04, 16 September 2016 (UTC)


126.5.26.119

Resolved

jdx Re: 05:51, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done blocked for a month. @Jdx: I am waiting for your RfA. :P Jianhui67 talk★contribs 06:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

119.30.47.252

✓ Done

jdx Re: 19:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done by Achim55 --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:45, 17 September 2016 (UTC)


Tassie-Politicians

Resolved

jdx Re: 05:49, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Mess cleaned up and user blocked for 3 days. INeverCry 06:34, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

IvAnKaKrUgEr

Resolved

ValterVB (talk) 19:03, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Blocked. INeverCry 20:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Gonlinkbd

Resolved

jdx Re: 12:30, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Blocked. Storkk (talk) 12:33, 20 September 2016 (UTC)


Melanieclopez0214

Resolved

jdx Re: 19:00, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked. Эlcobbola talk 19:07, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Plettman

Resolved

CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 09:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

 Not done Per the (ongoing) discussion at User talk:Plettman; a disagreement about the "scope" of location categories (i.e. whether appropriately used for images actually depicting said location or for images merely taken in said location) this is not vandalism. Please COM:AGF. Эlcobbola talk 15:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)


216.14.12.218

Resolved

jdx Re: 15:55, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done IP blocked. Эlcobbola talk 16:03, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

2001:8003:190F:3300:E9BD:1945:E83B:FB09

Resolved

★ Poké95 06:27, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done I blocked the IP for a week, vandalism is reverted by Pokéfan. Taivo (talk) 06:31, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
@Taivo: Seems that 101.177.225.211 (talk · contribs) is their new address. Don't know if they are 100% connected to each other, since I don't understand Arabic, but they both removed the license of the same file. ★ Poké95 10:42, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:45, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Yes, I blocked it and now I am going to semi-protect some files. Taivo (talk) 10:46, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
They are back again as 2001:8003:190F:3300:2CF4:9265:DB5D:6585, but they only made 2 edits and have stopped. Block this IP for block evasion, or leave it unblocked and watch them instead? Thanks, ★ Poké95 11:51, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done I blocked the IP for a week. Taivo (talk) 06:48, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Szm2006

Resolved

jdx Re: 07:10, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Blocked. I've closed the DRs rather than deleting the pages. That way the bot can easily archive them from the daily listing. INeverCry 07:36, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Dd1495

Resolved

Poeticbent talk 16:19, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done I blocked him/her indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 06:59, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

2006szm

Resolved

jdx Re: 12:23, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:07, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

194.68.85.240

Resolved

jdx Re: 09:35, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Done. Эlcobbola talk 09:50, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

77.154.224.145

Resolved

jdx Re: 08:36, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Done. INeverCry 16:07, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

User:Taivo

Resolved

This user (User:Taivo) shamelessly invaded my pages I've created and vandalised photos and texts with references! I call on Administration attention to block this troll. Eventually, pages will be protected (locked) from any further of such kind "friendly" contributors. If user Taivo is a real Wikipedia contributor (which is hardly to say due to his profile information where he impersonates him/herself as a Wikipedia troll), he/she shoud've asked me in a personal message for more details on a photo or text information. We ask, Wikipedia Administration, to pay more attention on its contributors who not all of them contribute for the good of the website. Cyberfoxy6 (talk) 20:27, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

As you can see from talkpage of Cyberfoxy, I deleted a lot of his/her uploads. They were found on different external sites with earlier date and at least same size. Cyberfoxy gave wrong licenses. Some files I kept, because they were too old for copyright protection. I re-licensed, described and categorized them. Cyberfoxy re-uploaded some copyvios. Taivo (talk) 21:06, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 Not done Bogus complaint against Taivo. Cyberfoxy6 blocked for uploading copyvios after final warning. Эlcobbola talk 21:13, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

影山光頭王

Resolved
User VOA-blocked, uploads nuked. INeverCry 21:50, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

1.53.184.231

Resolved

jdx Re: 12:20, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

 Info It seems to me like the user's attempts to fix some descriptions and categorization; not clear vandalisms. I do not see license removals among recent edits. If they still do something wrong, rather instructing the user than blocking is suggested. Ankry (talk) 15:13, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

@Ankry: All files that the vandal edited were uploaded by Hung1505khta and it's clear (at lest to me) that the photos were taken by the same person – they look similar and were taken with the same smartphone. But the vandal for each of these 5 files replaced author's name with a random name: [5], [6], [7], [8] and [9]. Also s/he removed licence templates and changed source fields and dates. It's clear vandalism to me. Yes, later s/he calmed down, probably because s/he noticed my report here. I have strange feeling that her/his recent edits are also vandalism, but I can't prove it. BTW. The other issue is copyright status of these photos – they look like photos of pages from a book. But hey, COM:AGF. --jdx Re: 16:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
In the third diff, the source is switched to "internet"; in two others the uploader's username is replaced with usernames of non-existent accounts. This is disruptive/vandalism. He's on a dynamic IP, and probably gets a new IP every 24/36 hours judging by his editing so far which spans almost a full day. If the vandalism starts up under a second IP, a 3-day/1 week block of 1.53.176.0/20 might be necessary. For now I've filed Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Hung1505khta for the uploads. INeverCry 01:12, 3 October 2016 (UTC)


Lucasaraujo2017

Resolved

Jardel @lves talk 07:16, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Uploads nuked, user warned. INeverCry 08:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

113.22.148.237

Resolved

jdx Re: 05:57, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done 2 weeks block. Ankry (talk) 06:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

E4024

Resolved

HakanIST (talk) 06:48, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Where? --E4024 (talk) 06:54, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
This for one, and adding file to made up category Category:Üsküdar University alumni , not to mention the edit war.--HakanIST (talk) 06:58, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
You are wrong, first of all, because I only improved the categorization there. Secondly, you say I remove categories "without discussion" but you report me to this board (first time ever someone did that) "without discussing with me" my edits first. Please also ask people if everytime they add or remove a cat they discuss it. Discuss with whom? Have a good day. --E4024 (talk) 07:01, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
@HakanIST and E4024: creating a user person's category is a good thing if more than a single file belongs there. E4024, do you intend add more files there? But it shouldn't be considered vandalism. As well as removing overcategorisation. Ankry (talk) 07:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
First please you tell me: What about violating the 3RR? Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 07:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
@HakanIST and E4024: and for future, please try to resolve your doubts in direct discussion with the user making controversial changes instead of editwaring and before reporting here. The more precise categorisation by E4024, eg Category:Women of Istanbul instead of Category:People of Istanbul is a right way, IMO. Ankry (talk) 07:33, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
closing for now as resolved. Please continue the discussion on your talk pages. Ankry (talk) 07:33, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

122.95.117.118

Resolved

jdx Re: 17:27, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:49, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


122.95.121.43

Resolved

jdx Re: 19:20, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

122.95.121.0/24 blocked for a week, and page salted. lNeverCry 19:50, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Jameslwoodward

Resolved

Despite proper copy right terms, all the photos that I had uploaded on Wikimedia were removed by user:Jameslwoodward without any prior notification. What's going on to be exact? Arashtitan (talk) 17:09, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Ping Jameslwoodward. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:10, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
All qualified as speedy deletions, which required immediate deletion. One had an explicit NC license and the others came from the web -- either sites with an explicit copyright notice or with no free license. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:39, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
@Arashtitan: No vandalism has occurred here. Please review COM:L, COM:CB, and especially COM:NETCOPYVIO before uploading any more images. Thank you. lNeverCry 21:06, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
@INeverCry: & @Jameslwoodward: Thanks for your prompt replies. I have reviewed the terms and I would like to state that the copy rights were addressed accurately, the images had not been downloaded from the internet, and I do have the legal right to post all those images. Given that, what is the next step now? Can we roll-back the photos? Shall I re-upload them? Or there are further legal clarifications which need to be addressed? Arashtitan (talk) 21:25, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
If you think the files were deleted in error, you may request undeletion at COM:UDR. Do not reupload them yourself. Jcb (talk) 21:33, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
@Arashtitan: If you are licensing works on Commons, that you own and have previously published elsewhere, you should read COM:OTRS. Reventtalk 21:40, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Thanks @Revent: & @Jcb: Arashtitan (talk) 22:06, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
@Arashtitan: Hello, please see my oppose in your undeletion request. Thanks, ★ Poké95 01:28, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

97.118.171.202

Resolved

jdx Re: 18:50, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Already blocked for 1 day. --Túrelio (talk) 18:52, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Another block is needed immediately. --jdx Re: 22:15, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done lNeverCry 22:56, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

2602:306:cefa:3440:4413:6dbe:54ac:f76

Resolved

jdx Re: 17:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Blocked for 3 days per vandalism. --Achim (talk) 19:15, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

機甲戰神

Resolved

Techyan（Talk） 13:57, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

121.207.95.20

Resolved

--サンティ [talk] 12:41, 16 October 2016 (UTC).

✓ Done lNeverCry 20:42, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

96.44.133.66

Resolved

jdx Re: 15:26, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Not necessary, since he was globally blocked until 2021. Érico (talk) 15:55, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

User:Taxbroker

Resolved

 MaxxL - talk 21:14, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Duck, Duck, and, well,  It looks like a duck to me. Even without connecting directly to the original, obviously a sock of the more recent blocked socks. Indeffed. Reventtalk 23:02, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
@Elcobbola: Revisiting Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Blackwhiteupl might be a good idea. Reventtalk 03:05, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed, also Doomprogress. Эlcobbola talk 03:56, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

41.202.219.76

Resolved

Druddigon (talk | contributions) 11:02, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Proxy blocked, spam hidden. lNeverCry 11:20, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

C012b

Resolved

142.254.107.113 18:01, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

 Not done He is not uploading porn. He uploaded it almost two years ago and has been inactive since then. You have nominated his files for deletion and now just please wait for a decision of community and an administrator. --jdx Re: 18:32, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
But please don't nominated them all for deletion simply because it is porn. You should explain why it should be deleted, for example, low quality (out of COM:SCOPE), copyright violation, etc. ★ Poké95 01:01, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

USER/IP

Resolved

112.198.102.158 07:31, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Someone is reporting his own IP. \S/ --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:12, 27 October 2016 (UTC)


126.5.26.119

Resolved

Malhierarchy

Resolved

 MaxxL - talk 18:12, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Blocked indef, thanks for notifying! --Achim (talk) 18:29, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

69.115.64.0/20

Resolved

Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:07, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

See this and this for previous related. Has been on this range for most of the year. See range report. Previously used range 108.5.64.0/20. Has been blocked for addition of bogus unreferenced bio categories every time has been identified on enwiki (See example). Also active on wikidata doing similar. I am not sure about Commons categorization policies but most of the categories used seem little related to useful categorization of images for the people involved and are mostly empty after his bogus categories have been remove. I expect that false categorization of people's personal information is discouraged but can't find any Commons policy that makes that explicit as it is on enwiki w:WP:BLPCAT and w:WP:BLP. I have been working to clean up what I could find and notice other editors doing the same when they run across it. A range block on Commons looks to have little collateral damage based on what I can see and cleaning up the useless categories he has added might be beneficial to Commons. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:22, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
Also currently using IPs in 173.2.62.0/23 range for similar edits. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:52, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done by Hedwig in Washington. --★ Poké95 01:08, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Not quite. Still sweeping. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:10, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done empty cats removed. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:56, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Mokezhilao

Resolved

Techyan（Talk） 08:50, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done I blocked him/her for a week and deleted most uploads. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Jkffa

Resolved

Goodshort (talk) 08:35, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Seeing their talk page, they have stopped after final warning. Let's wait for their further actions. A block is not needed now IMHO. ★ Poké95 08:44, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Well, actually the first warning occured on October 31st and he kept dowloading copyrighted pictures until this morning... Goodshort (talk) 08:54, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
I'm watching their talk page after deleting some of their uploads that appeared as if they weren't warned (although Goodshort warned them on frwiki). I was about to block them this morning, but noticed that INeverCry had blocked then unblocked this morning. Given this history, I think we can probably wait for the next violation before blocking... but it does highlight why warnings should be given here whether they are given on another wiki as well or not. Storkk (talk) 09:01, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Two new ones. Goodshort (talk) 09:10, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Blocked for 1 week. --Túrelio (talk) 09:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Guess I should've followed my gut and let the block stand. But you never know, sometimes these guys do stop with a warning...sometimes... lNeverCry 10:53, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism

Not vandalism but edit warring. I warned both of you. If you two continue revert each other, both of you may be blocked from editing. Please discuss first on each other's talk pages before reverting. Thanks, ★ Poké95 12:07, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Azizetmohamed

Resolved

CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 09:17, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:02, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
I am not doubting the revdel of the vandalism (I am not doubting you also as an admin), and I am not an admin, so I would not see the reverted edit. But may I ask what is the reason for the revdel (I am not asking for the contents)? Is it because it was an "inappropriate personal information"? "Grossly inappropriate content"? And normally, vandals with only one edit are not blocked (and instead warned), unless if they are a LTA or a sockpuppet. If you think I am disrespecting you, please disregard this, as your fellow colleague sent me a sarcastic message. Thanks, ★ Poké95 12:11, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Replied on your talk. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:15, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Sean Mellis

Pending

117Avenue (talk) 03:31, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Definitely gives the impression as being the same person as Lesser Slave River - reuploaded the same files - but the first account was neither warned nor blocked. Warnings left, and marked as a suspected sockpuppet... if he creates a 'third' account I'll block them all. Some specific explanation of why the files are not ok (no FOP for 2D works in Canada) might help, however. Reventtalk 07:57, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, I'm not always sure the right path to go down on Commons. 117Avenue (talk) 03:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Hihuan0023

Resolved

Magnus (talk) 08:44, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Blocked. lNeverCry 08:49, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Aaron_tank

Resolved

-- Jakubhal 16:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Last warning sent, user page deleted as out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:35, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

ScolopendraJazz

Resolved

 MaxxL - talk 08:26, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Blocked and tagged. lNeverCry 20:19, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

2007szm

Resolved

--サンティ [talk] 08:41, 12 November 2016 (UTC).

Blocked and tagged. Uploads nuked. Two overwritten files history cleaned and full upload protected for 6 months. lNeverCry 09:20, 12 November 2016 (UTC)


Mokezhilao

Resolved

Techyan（Talk） 05:10, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Fredmak2016

Resolved

-WayKurat (talk) 16:12, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Considering, that he has uploaded so far 1 copyvio and 2 out-of-scope images and created 1 speedily-deleted category, I warned him and hope, that this is enough. If not, he must be blocked. Taivo (talk) 18:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Expedientialracism

Resolved

 MaxxL - talk 08:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Blocked and tagged. lNeverCry 09:35, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

82.49.147.202

Resolved

Ruthven (msg) 10:03, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Dynamic IP, blocked for a day. I've already seen 2–3 times an IP inserting File:Finocchio.jpg into a talk page (perhaps yours?), so when it happens again, a soft range block might be applied. --jdx Re: 10:25, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 Comment It was 82.49.147.254. --jdx Re: 10:29, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Yep, thank you jdx! A fennel is, in Italy, a derisive way to say "gay". As the vandal is homophobic as well, this was meant to be an insult. --Ruthven (msg) 11:04, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

GGN TPhA

Resolved

Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 01:18, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Final warning and whale sent. ★ Poké95 03:21, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Kma123

Resolved

Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 12:52, 27 November 2016 (UTC)


Soepyitaung

Resolved

Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 13:32, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done I warned the user. Copyvios are deleted. I nominated his last remaining upload for regular deletion. Taivo (talk) 17:34, 27 November 2016 (UTC)


Ko kyaw 111

Resolved

Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 18:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done, speedied and warned. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:32, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Boris7

Resolved

Harold (talk) 15:48, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. Blocked for one day for now. Investigation. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:55, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Indefed after investigation. User states on his discussion page that he has no interest in participating anymore (according to Google Translate) and left as a vandal. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:03, 28 November 2016 (UTC)


PirnaSun

Resolved

 MaxxL - talk 17:26, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:20, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

1449 AM

Resolved
  • User: 1449 AM (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
  • Reasons for reporting: This account was blocked on November 2 at en.wiki for being a sockpuppet of longterm vandal en:User:Bertrand101 (see SPI report from en.wiki). The Commons account of this vandal became active in uploading a bunch of hoax logos and photos of supposed transmitter towers of his hoax radio stations here in commons up until November 27. A permanent block should be issued here to this sock and to nuke all of his uploads. -

WayKurat (talk) 13:26, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done indefinitely blocked by Hedwig in Washington. Taivo (talk) 13:54, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Mission Kashmir III

Cross-wiki vandalism only account, many nonsense DRs, on en:wp speedy DRs as well. --Achim (talk) 20:59, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done indef --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:18, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Paigh45

Pending

Goodshort (talk) 09:02, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Possible sockpuppets of Mission Kashmir III

I found several nominations on the files originally nominated by Mission_Kashmir_III (talk · contributions · Statistics) (see the contributions), then nominated again. Some possible sockpuppets (found by DUCK) are:

Please indef block these users, and please speedy close the DRs and semi (if possible fully) protect the files nominated by these users. --Amitie 10g (talk) 12:06, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done I blocked the 2 other accounts as socks. Yann (talk) 14:11, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
w:Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Najaf_ali_bhayo may prove useful in future in co-ordinating blocks against this user. Nick (talk) 14:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
I linked our Category:Sockpuppets of Mission Kashmir III to it. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:05, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Requests to deal with sockpuppets, especially "possible sockpuppets," need to be made at COM:RFCU. Requests at admin noticeboards make it much harder for CUs to research previous behaviour/socks and preclude a search for sleepers unless a CU happens by (e.g. Sher Aziz I and Chitral Wikipedia were sleepers not identified above). Эlcobbola talk 16:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

2604:6000:1115:18:6830:9B15:8B03:FD8B

Resolved

Auntof6 (talk) 23:32, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Thanks for reverting! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:00, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

User:Chputh and User:Chputch

Obvious vandals + socks --Denniss (talk) 23:18, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done One globally locked by WMFOffice, I blocked the other one. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet of Szm020730

--Amitie 10g (talk) 13:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done by Jdx. Yann (talk) 14:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Woman35

✓ Done

File:16-12-22-Bundeskriminalamt-Anis-Amri-3.jpg

 Not done malformed request; answered below. Storkk (talk) 11:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Ralf Roletschek

 Not done

Giraldillo (talk) 11:24, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Proper procedure after a speedy template is removed is to file a DR, not to just revert each other. One should also not remove speedy templates from one's own uploads except in the case of unambiguous vandalism, which this was not. However, that does not excuse a revert war either. You've both been warned not to edit war now, so please stop. Storkk (talk) 11:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Hanzzzzz07

✓ Done

User was given a final warning by User:Herbythyme. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:39, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Gadvin 200

Pending

Grand-Duc (talk) 20:58, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Full block, no email, to talk page. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:57, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

WWW123PPP (talk · contribs)

Hanay (talk) 09:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done. For future reference: How do I recognize this as a sock of User:יעל י? This user seems to have stalked your edits only. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
@Srittau: . Thank you. She is stalking me and also User:Geagea, also on Wikidata, English wikipedia; German wikipedia, etc...etc.... I am her main target because I am a sysop in Hebrew Wikipedia and I am dealing there with her vandalism. This is her juvenile revenge, so pathetic. It is easy to recognize her she undo my edits wiht no good reasons. Hanay (talk) 09:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks Sebari. This one is another sock of User:יעל י. -- Geagea (talk) 09:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

AnatW (talk · contribs)

Hanay (talk) 14:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done. Blocked and reverted vandalism. -- Geagea (talk) 14:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

MinzerMoshe (talk · contribs)

Hanay (talk) 17:30, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:52, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Vandalism also reverted. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:56, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

蚊扨

Kyube (talk) 06:43, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Blocked, but someone else needs to revert the vandalism, since I currently have no time. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:01, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Vandalisms reverted. --Ruthven (msg) 17:27, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

PolyGamma

Pending

Amitie 10g (talk) 17:06, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Indeed suspicious. Warned. Could you please create a Requests for checkuser? Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:04, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Duck. Blocked 3 days pending confirmation: Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/PolyGamma. Yann (talk) 08:28, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Confirmed and blocked indef by Revent. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

User:האוטו שלנו גדול וירוק

Vandalizm of the same famous troll User:יעל י. sock האוטו שלנו גדול וירוק (talk · contribs). Please block and undo. Thanks. Hanay (talk) 11:39, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done.-- Geagea (talk)

Amal aziz22 (talk · contribs)

Uploaded unfree and unhelpful photos --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Files deleted, user warned. Yann (talk) 12:46, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Amal aziz22 re-uploaded deleted content. I blocked him/her for a month. Now I'll delete his/her uploads. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Quequieresdemi (talk · contribs)

Uploaded unfree photos --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:28, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Warned today by User:Herbythyme. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:10, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done (S)He continued uploading copyvios. I blocked him/her for a month and deleted all his/her contributions. Taivo (talk) 10:52, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

TheSkriLLTruth

Resolved

Don-kun (talk) 06:29, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Continuing to go around blanking everything despite final warning. —SpacemanSpiff 06:53, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Someone please block, this is a nuisance including on this board. —SpacemanSpiff 07:07, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Blocked by Materialscientist. Vandalisms reverted. --jdx Re: 08:05, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

מלאכים49 (talk · contribs)

Sock of User:יעל י Thanks Hanay (talk) 15:33, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked by User:Geagea. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:53, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

CB2288

Resolved

Amitie 10g (talk) 02:43, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

User blocked, DRs speedy closed (kept) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

User:משה אזולאי

This is a Sockpuppet of User:יעל י. Please block her and Undo her edits. Thanks. Hanay (talk) 20:00, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:11, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

User:מרבד הקסמים

This is a Sockpuppet of User:יעל י. Please block her and Undo her edits. Thanksץ Hanay (talk) 17:40, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done by User:Herbythyme ----Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

2606:6000:FD0B:CA00:E515:A121:ADB0:FD95

✓ Done

Funcrunch (talk) 08:01, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done by User:Herbythyme --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:12, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

User:ZZ-AA-BB

This is a Sockpuppet of User:יעל י. Please block her and Undo her edits. Thanks. Hanay (talk) 18:55, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Globally blocked a few minutes ago by MarcoAurelio. --jdx Re: 19:01, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Drdoht

Resolved

Atamari (talk) 00:25, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Nachricht hinterlassen, Datei fuer eine Wo. gesperrt. Sollte das nicht reichen, bitte Info. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:03, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

49.197.107.232

Pending

Amitie 10g (talk) 12:51, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Yann (talk) 13:26, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Misspapassorn

Pending
Note: the user uploaded a new self-promo file (see the DR), and did a pair of strange/nonsense edits (first and second), both reverted. The "report" to the abuse filter was related to this file and this DR. Clearly here only to spam his business, to block as soon as possible. --Dэя-Бøяg 04:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

GADI990 (talk · contribs)

This is a Sockpuppet of User:יעל י. Please block her and Undo her edits. Thanks. Hanay (talk) 14:57, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done--Steinsplitter (talk) 15:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


Der Staat

✓ Done

Clemens 01:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Blocked, diff hidden. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

קרמשניט (talk · contribs)

Another sock of User:יעל י

Thanks Hanay (talk) 17:52, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done--Steinsplitter (talk) 17:54, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

ロングラン

Resolved

--sasha (krassotkin) 12:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Vandalism-only account, blocked indefinitely. --jdx Re: 13:17, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

79.12.190.75

Ip keeps adding bogus copyvio templates and removing talkpage warnings. Tm (talk) 03:50, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Soft blocked the whole 79.12.0.0/16, 79.53.0.0/16 and 80.183.101.0/24 for a month. This is long-term vandal who harasses Vituzzu, most likely Fritella (Vituzzu, could you confirm this?). Here is the list of anonymous contributions from these ranges + 80.183.0.0/17 since 1st January 2016. --jdx Re: 06:58, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Yep, all of those are fritella's block evasions, but I don't think this will be enough. While the 79.12.0.0/16 subnet is definitely the one with higher hit number he can come from almost any chunk in roughly half of 79.0.0.0/8, but also from 95.224.0.0/12 (usually the central ones), lots of 82.0.0.0/8 (around the end of the lower /10), something in 80.0.0.0/8 (not so often though) and a fair number of 87.0.0.0/8 (again around the end of the lower /10). Rangeblocks might mitigate his attacks but I think blocking abusefilter rules are the only solution. He circumvents non blocking rules by bruteforce, making hundreds of attempts (see Special:Abusefilter/146 and Special:Abusefilter/170). Also, some kind of automatic monitoring subcats (I'm not really those means into but afair Commons has some) of category:selfies would be definitely needed. I expect him to switch, sooner or later, to infest autism and sexuality related categories, so what is, above all, needed is training admins to revert these blatantly silly deletion tag (see this, this and this...yep I was pretty upset of them).--Vituzzu (talk) 11:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Hedwig in Washington

Resolved

Niklitov (talk) 07:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

I do not think there is any problem here that requires urgent admin action. IMO, this edit explains what has happened here. Ankry (talk) 08:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)


Edgar183

✓ Done

Blocked, images deleted. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

ThatGuy911

✓ Done

Blocked, image deleted, likely sock of User:Edgar183 above. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:27, 7 February 2017 (UTC)


NobodyHome

Resolved

Auntof6 (talk) 03:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Indefinitely blocked by Magog the Ogre, edits reverted. --jdx Re: 04:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Kekoalmeida

✓ Done

Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Blocked by Yann. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Torihon62

Resolved

Fusianasan1350 (talk) 07:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Copyvios deleted. I do not think any other action is needed unless the user continues non-free uploads. Ankry (talk) 07:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Lonely Potato

Resolved

Leyo 09:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Indeffed. Materialscientist (talk) 10:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Vandal deletion request

Resolved

Can an admin please close Commons:Deletion requests/File:Xmas tree.svg. This is obvious vandalism. lNeverCry 06:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Deleted it instead. Materialscientist (talk) 06:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Cernunnos54

Pending

Santa maya

Magnus (talk) 08:32, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done per COM:AN/B. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

ヒヤリ8棟

Resolved

Qurren (talk) 09:06, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: one week block, vandalisms reverted. Thank you for your report. Ankry (talk) 09:31, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Virtwolf

Resolved
  • User: Virtwolf (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
  • Reasons for reporting: Here he requested a rotation on one of my images, which was then carried out by a bot. That destroyed the layout on all the 5 articles where the animation is used, all the 5 articles now will have to be edited since the rotated aspect ratio got cached by the articles themselves (see screenshot, Image 2 - both images have the same size and aspect ratio, but the aspect ratio of image 2 got messed up even after reverting the vandalism. There was absolutely no reason for this 90° rotation, that was vandalism causing unescessary work and messed up the layout in 5 articles.

Yukterez (talk) 04:17, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

I have warned the user and restored the file to the state before rotation request. Regarding articles, you shouldn't have edited them to fix the layout, you should have just waited patiently for server's cache update. Sometimes it takes a while. Other, better way is purging. --jdx Re: 06:55, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Panoramio upload bot

Pending

Rodomonte (talk) 23:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Is there no way to stop amok running bots? There are already 24 new articles in Category:Medea which don't belong there. --Rodomonte (talk) 07:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
The bot "thinks" what categories would be added to a file, but it is not always correct (it is not an A.I.), that's why it may upload files with incorrect categories. Please don't report community approved bots (like this bot) to this admin noticeboard when you have a problem with it (if it is malfunctioning, report it to COM:AN/B, or if you use IRC, send an urgent ping to the admins using "!admin <request>" on #wikimedia-commons for a faster response), instead, assume good faith and talk to the bot operator (in this case, Shizhao). If you want to stop this bot from functioning, you may either ask nicely the bot operator to stop the bot or make a community discussion on COM:VP (it will probably not succeed, but I will support if you or someone do so anyway). Thanks, ★ Poké95 09:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Talking to the bot operator only works if the bot operator responds and acts on feedback. That hasn't worked. See:
—LX (talk, contribs) 20:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
User:Panoramio upload bot/blacklist.json requires at least 1-2 days update to the script--shizhao (talk) 06:46, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
It is still not working correctly. There have again been new entries after 3 days. I think, the bot should never use non-geographical categories at all. And perhaps it should only use subcategories instead of flooding arbitrary categories which don't have anything to do with the images. --Rodomonte (talk) 09:44, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Just tell me: Are these women witches and murderesses of children as the category Category:Medea states?
Cité police ثنية الحجر - panoramio
. --Rodomonte (talk) 09:48, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Zarinaji

Resolved

El Grafo (talk) 11:10, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Indefinitely blocked. --jdx Re: 11:19, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Anonimsiber

Resolved

jhawkinson 18:59, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Vandalism-only account –> indefinitely blocked. --jdx Re: 19:20, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Tamara787

Resolved

Tuanminh01 (talk) 06:21, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

 Comment At the moment I can't see a reason to block her here, on Commons. --jdx Re: 11:34, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Globally locked by Melos - Reventtalk 07:19, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
@Revent: Thanks, please remove the false pictures that he/she created on commons. Regards, Tuanminh01 (talk) 05:27, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
@Tuanminh01: The images of the 1934 Federal Reserves Notes should not be deleted. They should be kept, and instead correctly described as images of 'notable' fakes. See https://www.treasury.gov/about/organizational-structure/ig/Pages/Scams/Examples-of-Known-Phony-Securities.aspx under "Morgenthau". - Reventtalk 08:40, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Halford Brimley

Resolved

Laser brain (talk) 23:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Indefinitely blocked. --jdx Re: 02:07, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

special:contributions/109.149.30.161

uh, Im pretty sure this person's edits would be disruptive, but borderline vandalism. The person is adding Category:Artificial poppies to monuments with some poppies, but i disagree. MechQuester (talk) 15:40, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

I think these look like good-faith edits; if you disagree with the additions, why not ask for clarification? If none is forthcoming, revert. But not all artificial poppies are on war memorials, and not all war memorials have artificial poppies. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Also 86.182.223.52. Both IPs from Southall, Ealing, UK. @MechQuester: Do you mean adding Category:Artificial poppies? IMO these (minor) edits are not vandalisms. However I'm not sure if these flowers are poppies. --jdx Re: 15:57, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
I guess I just disagree with the additions. Can I withdraw my report? MechQuester (talk) 15:59, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Ooops I've just noticed that MechQuester has Category:Artificial poppies in mind. --jdx Re: 16:02, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

 Not done As per discussion above. --jdx Re: 16:08, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

User:Im344userpqnpoo

User:Amortias (T)(C) 22:48, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Account blocked indefinitely. Nick (talk) 22:58, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Jayboyspecker

Resolved

The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 18:09, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked, files deleted. Yann (talk) 18:15, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

240D:1A:381:8000:8D6A:D751:C066:5C47

Resolved

アルトクール (talk) 08:49, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Globally blocked for 3 days. --jdx Re: 09:13, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Troll alert

Ceiling fan Troll at File:The Earth seen from Apollo 17.jpg. Please also search for sleepers. --Denniss (talk) 22:06, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Uploader blocked indefinitely. --Didym (talk) 22:18, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Mohonk Mountain House Garden.jpg

Please delete the ceiling fans from the image history. (Old vandalism from April 2015, the perpetrators are already blocked.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:18, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done. I cleaned history of 4 files, vandal accounts are indefinitely blocked and I tagged one of them as sockpuppet. Taivo (talk) 08:52, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

240D:1A:381:8000:A8E9:DC8C:70DA:D193

Pending

アルトクール (talk) 13:52, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Blocked Yann (talk) 17:21, 22 March 2017 (UTC)


240D:1A:381:8000:BC75:BFE2:696A:1A60

Resolved

アルトクール (talk) 07:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked locally for a day. This should be reported at Meta. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

126.5.32.160

Resolved
126.5.0.0/18 blocked for a year to match the ja.wiki block. Daphne Lantier 06:42, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

126.26.16.64

Resolved
✓ Done I've blocked the /24 for one week, though I doubt blocking will have much effect in this situation. I've protected two of the files and put the other two on my watchlist in case he hits them with his next IP. Daphne Lantier 00:20, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/Vinceesq spam

Pending

 — billinghurst sDrewth 21:41, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Files renamed, spam removed. But wow! smart spam undetected for years! :(
But the spam is still visible in the upload history. And some of files do not have a source now. Some of the files are used. What do we do? Oversight the links? Delete the files? Yann (talk) 22:26, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
I noticed that some of the files have been first published on another website, see the history of those files. I am thinking of nominating them for deletion to obtain OTRS permission, but all of those files seems to be taken with the same camera. And what's more confusing is that those files are sourced to different sites. What an intelligent spammer... ★ Poké95 01:33, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the doing. We have identified a lot of similar spam in the past year. Much we have just deleted as while it was somewhat in scope, it was not used, nor likely to be. At the same time I am less fussed about stuff remnant in the history, as it won't particularly looked at or followed.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:22, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Ajaykaransharma9211

Resolved

Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 16:49, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Sismarinho le blasé nominated his/her last remaining uploads for deletion and I warned Ajaykaransharma9211 not to upload more personal photos. No other action is needed now, but if he continues, then he must be blocked. Taivo (talk) 07:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

南文會館

Resolved

User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:52, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for a week. Some of the overwritten files restored. --jdx Re: 10:31, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

204.78.76.5

Resolved

Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV (talk) 18:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done blocked for 1 day --Didym (talk) 18:29, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

GShingavi

 Not done

Exactly 1 deleted selfie 7 months ago and no other edits on Commons doesn't match 'vandalism', or did I miss something? --Achim (talk) 20:27, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
  • If you have crosswiki issues with a user, contact a steward. We are only focused on our specific project, where this user has only made one contribution not worthy of a block. Please note we are not an encyclopedia. ~riley (talk) 20:32, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Biendotip12

Resolved

-- User: Perhelion 12:01, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Indef blocked. ~riley (talk) 16:43, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

WidmerTamy

Resolved

→ «« Man77 »» [de] 11:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

blocked by NordNordWest, uploads deleted --Didym (talk) 12:58, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Kevinthomas1864

Resolved
✓ Done Blocked. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:47, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. Anyway, to prevent further crosswiki vandalisms, I requested a global lock. --Dэя-Бøяg 17:00, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Yujoong

✓ Done

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 03:38, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

✓ User warned. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:07, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Studentboy'sgroup

Resolved
✓ Done--Steinsplitter (talk) 15:04, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Juanjo erraez

Resolved
✓ Done Blocked. Daphne Lantier 06:27, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

MyRadioJavan

Resolved
Note: I see that he was blocked for vandalisms on fawiki (Persian WP). For this reason (crosswiki spam) I requested a global lock on meta. Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 05:15, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Blocked. Daphne Lantier 06:27, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Bint Hafiz

✓ Done

Wcam (talk) 13:37, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

✓ blocked Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:10, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 Unblocked due to a private e-mail, claiming to be a different person. I'll assume good faith for now. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 03:26, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
I admire your rosy-cheeked faith in the goodness of mankind, but I think you've been lied to. Since yesterday, there's a third account uploading license laundered copyright violations relating to the same Chinese actor: Special:Contributions/Ms. Khalid. Coincidence? Check requested to find out. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:09, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done. Checkuser blocked them all indefinitely as sockpuppets and I created category:Sockpuppets of Yujoong. Taivo (talk) 06:58, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Cami hollywood

Resolved

Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:08, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Upload deleted and user blocked for a week. Daphne Lantier 03:23, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Magnus Manske

Pending

Frze > talk 12:14, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

I see you've tried to raise an issue with Magnus Manske but got no response.[11] I suspect you find that frustrating. I see no evidence of vandalism, only a low-grade revert war.[12] If you are having troubles with another user, you could try Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. You should notify the subject when you start a discussion on a noticeboard. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:54, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
The user (or his script) is insisting on performing an illegal crop on a non free image. The User is performing lots of automatic or semiautomatic edits which only deteriorate the quality of content and he is not willing to discuss any of it. --Ailura (talk) 06:37, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

47.37.172.27

Resolved

—Odysseus1479 (talk) 23:30, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Blocked. Daphne Lantier 23:56, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Rosario Rosario1

✓ Done

FranciscoMG (talk) 08:32, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Nuked & blocked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:53, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Nalyd26

Resolved

MarioFinale (talk) 17:19, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done VOA blocked and uploads have been deleted. Daphne Lantier 19:01, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Malikdilshaad

Resolved

Leyo 21:08, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Selfie nuked and warned. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:27, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Saltan.andre

Resolved
✓ Done User warned, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Saltan.andre‎. Yann (talk) 13:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)


User:Ranniif dagh

Resolved

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 15:46, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Danielleyen

Resolved
Indef-blocked for spamming. Daphne Lantier 22:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Bibartas

Resolved

Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 21:44, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Blocked and uploads nuked. Daphne Lantier 22:53, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Ryansing131

Resolved

Techyan（Talk） 19:04, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done No useful contributions, 3-month second block. Yann (talk) 19:23, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Tidee48

Resolved

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 16:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Indefed by User:NahidSultan. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2017 (UTC)


Riley Cohen

Resolved

♞☤☮♌Kalki·†·⚓⊙☳☶⚡ 02:35, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

VOA blocked and porn overwrites erased. Daphne Lantier 02:49, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Usainnguyen

Resolved

Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 21:07, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

User blocked for 1 month. Daphne Lantier 21:21, 4 June 2017 (UTC)


Derasqzeatygf

Resolved

Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 21:25, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Jcb --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 21:47, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Treasa95

Resolved

Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 21:30, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

User blocked for 1 week. Daphne Lantier 22:04, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Ytaillan

Resolved

Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 21:33, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

User blocked for 1 week. Daphne Lantier 22:05, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

SINAGROUPS3

Resolved

Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 21:36, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

User blocked for 1 week. Daphne Lantier 22:06, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Creator30

Resolved

UAwiki (talk) 16:06, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Uploads deleted and user blocked. Daphne Lantier 17:27, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Carrotdestroyer505

Resolved

TimothyJosephWood 17:12, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

And you know... if someone wants to protect my user page for a spell that could be good too. TimothyJosephWood 17:26, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Uploads deleted, user blocked. @Timothyjosephwood: I've protected your user page for 3 months. Daphne Lantier 17:32, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Much appreciated. TimothyJosephWood 17:33, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Kaizer445

Resolved

TimothyJosephWood 19:28, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Uploads deleted and user VOA blocked. Daphne Lantier 19:58, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Comendador Romel Rodriguez

Resolved

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 05:07, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Acct blocked and new uploads deleted. Daphne Lantier 07:07, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

173.174.81.12

Resolved

Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 05:19, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

IP blocked and edits mass rollbacked. Daphne Lantier 07:04, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Prioryman

Resolved

87.102.116.36 01:56, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done. Daphne Lantier deleted speedily the image as copyright violation. No other action is needed. Taivo (talk) 07:56, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Bucyrus

Pending

Sex photos1

Resolved

TimothyJosephWood 12:25, 13 June 2017 (UTC)


223.136.64.169

Resolved

風鳴 (talk) 18:02, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done. I reverted the vandalism and blocked vandalistic IP-s for a day. It seems, that I must semi-protect the vandalized page. Probably one month is enough. Taivo (talk) 07:33, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

LDyou

Resolved
  • User: LDyou (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
  • Reasons for reporting: Since the user is active, he is vandalizing the categories of (and only) my contributions. As this user has not contributed anything usable (well, one copvio was provided) since creating his account, I cannot see any intention for a collaboration in Commons. Please warn and indef block if it occurs again.

CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 17:33, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done. Low-activity vandal, only 4 edits during 2 months. I warned him/her. If this does not help, then (s)he should be blocked. Taivo (talk) 18:04, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

He vandandalized one of my contributions again: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3ALahadDatu_Sabah_Courthouse-1.jpg&type=revision&diff=248680822&oldid=194879703

No response on the warning of User:Taivo. Please block indef. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 18:54, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Now I blocked him/her indefinitely. All 5 edits were vandalism or copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 18:59, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Hoàng Thùy Linh

Resolved

Tuanminh01 (talk) 09:56, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for 2 weeks, as this user removed the warnings for the 2nd time without acknowledging. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:45, 21 June 2017 (UTC)


Stankap1944

Resolved

Daniele.Brundu (talk) 19:52, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Was already warned by the User:Yann. Hystrix (talk) 00:37, 22 June 2017 (UTC)


Kyleselina

Resolved

B dash (talk) 06:18, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked. Daphne Lantier 06:32, 22 June 2017 (UTC)


110.159.32.250

Resolved

  — Jeff G. ツ 07:08, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Softblocked for a month. If behavior continues on the same IP address later, we can probably assume the IP is static and indefblock. Storkk (talk) 07:22, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Morganalok

Resolved

B dash (talk) 06:39, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done All his/her uploads so far were either out of scope or copyright violations, so I blocked him/her for a week. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

郭素芳

Resolved

B dash (talk) 02:09, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done. All uploads are either deleted or nominated for deletion. Blocked for a week. Taivo (talk) 07:47, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Nicki Minaj 8, 2012.jpg

Please revert Special:Diff/229237806/249109362. Thanks, —LX (talk, contribs) 08:57, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Yann (talk) 09:02, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

92.243.167.43

Resolved

Russian Rocky (talk) 05:57, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

I blocked the IP for a week and reverted all edits as extreme vandalism. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
@Taivo: FYI: I went over your head and made all the edits of this (insert your own swearword) invisible. It's a static IP according to [13]. I'd block this (IYOSw) for a bit longer, but that's your call. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:42, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
If that's a static IP, then I reblocked it for a year. I agree: making these edits invisible is good. Taivo (talk) 13:06, 26 June 2017 (UTC)


My favorite account 2

Resolved

Chrissymad (talk) 13:52, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Blocked, LTA. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:59, 26 June 2017 (UTC)


Classiccardinal

Resolved

Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:25, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Indef. This guy is SYSOP(!) on fr.wikitionary, unbelievable! m( He knows what's what and that he can't vandalize unpunished. Already has previous blocks and still vandalizes without any hesitation. Better for us if he finds other outlets. Can't behave here, can't edit here. Simple as pie. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:47, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Gdampflmonom

Resolved
  • User: Gdampflmonom (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
  • Reasons for reporting: New account empties lots of categories of nature reserves that may have contained no images, but are part of a complete system, and has them deleted. Obviously not a new user, but someone with an agenda. These categories are required for the WLE competitions, they are part of local categories and contain descriptions.

Sitacuisses (talk) 18:58, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

 Comment: Das Thema hatten wir schon. Genau deswegen wurde {{Prospective category}} angelegt. Hätte man nur zu benutzen brauchen, siehe Category:Prospective categories. --Achim (talk) 19:07, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Wenn der Benutzer sich nützlich machen möchte, soll er diese Vorlage einfügen statt die Kategorien zu leeren und löschen zu lassen. --Sitacuisses (talk) 19:11, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Sieht mir nicht nach Vandalismus aus, eher nach gut gemeintem Sommerputz. Prinzipiell sind die LAs schon richtig. Oder nicht ganz falsch. MMn Com:AGF --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Vorschlag zur Güte: Sobald Quarry wieder anständig läuft, scanne ich mal nach solchen Kategorien und füge {{Prospective category}} ein. --Achim (talk) 19:45, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Achim55, das wäre schön. Zu Hedwigs AGF-Vermutung frage ich mich, warum jemand für solche Power-Aktionen einen am gleichen Vormittag angelegten Account benutzt. --Sitacuisses (talk) 20:01, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Sitacuisses, ich gebe dir insofern recht, als der gezielte Gebrauch von HotCat und die Verwendung von {{Csd}} kurz nach Anlegen des Accounts schon den Verdacht auf Sockpuppetry aufkommen lässt. --Achim (talk) 20:14, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Die 90 (!) gelöschten Kategorien habe ich auf User talk:Hystrix#Naturschutzgebiet-Löschungen notiert. Ich hoffe, die werden noch wiederhergestellt. --Sitacuisses (talk) 22:06, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Crap. Details, details. Ja, merkwürdig ist das schon. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:21, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
+500 edits am ersten Tag. Augen auf beim Eierkauf Herr Administrator. Ich mache mich gleich an die 90 Kategorien ran. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:26, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
@Sitacuisses: Kategories wiederhergestellt, {{Prospective category}} eingebaut. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:28, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Auf meiner (ausgemisteten) BEO hätte ich noch Category:Spitzenberg bei Ebrach (NSG) --Derzno (talk) 04:56, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Das waren dann wohl alle. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:07, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Bitte auch seinen unflätigen Beitrag auf meiner Benutzerdiskussionsseite verstecken. --Sitacuisses (talk) 14:00, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Blocked, locked, key thrown away After Gdampflmonom successfully acted as an (insert your favorite noun here) and insulted other users, his account is now blocked and talk page acess removed as well. Another of my Com:AGF down the drain. On my way, Sitacuisses, had to grab some C(_) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 14:03, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Moist towelett

Resolved

KylieTastic (talk) 16:04, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Aqw96 (talk) 16:06, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked, file deleted. Yann (talk) 16:13, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


Lmt 86

Resolved

B dash (talk) 02:35, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked. Daphne Lantier 03:12, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Evdenevenakliyatciler

Resolved
✓ Done Yann (talk) 21:27, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

İste-al

Resolved
✓ Done Yann (talk) 21:30, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Reelmatbaa2013

Resolved
✓ Done Already globally locked. Yann (talk) 21:36, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Afmkatlanırcam

Resolved
✓ Done Yann (talk) 21:38, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Hannah0115

Resolved

Willy1018 (talk) 12:51, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Yann (talk) 15:07, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

User:Music jaibee

Resolved
Edit: Thanks to Tacsipacsi who did a major part of cleaning up. --Achim (talk) 18:05, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Vandalism deleted/rolled back & user VOA blocked. Daphne Lantier 18:41, 5 July 2017 (UTC)


JolsenxD

Resolved

Sitacuisses (talk) 23:44, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done New uploads nuked and user blocked for a week. Daphne Lantier 23:55, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Ankaraotokurtarma006

Resolved
User hasn't edited here in over three years. No admin action is needed. Daphne Lantier 05:28, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Wanye2004

Resolved
✓ Done Blocked. Daphne Lantier 05:25, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Mediateckboards

Resolved

— Speravir – 01:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done User blocked for spamming. Daphne Lantier 03:44, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Pdamkomon

Pending

Sitacuisses (talk) 12:51, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

There are three primary ranges, with Confirmed relationships as follows:
It is technically Possible that the three ranges are related, but obviously that becomes at least Likely with consideration of behaviour. Given the timing of the creation of accounts (i.e., accounts created "randomly," as opposed to in response to a block/sanction of an existing account) and the timing of edits (i.e., accounts are not "discarded," but rather one will edit for a time, another will edit for a time, and then the first will edit again), it may be that this is not a single person. I will look into the relationships further, but, for the moment, I would block solely based on behaviour--those making the attacks. Эlcobbola talk 18:13, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Lwinky

Pending

B dash (talk) 02:23, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Lwinky

Resolved

B dash (talk) 03:46, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:00, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

NicoDIVIDIDOS

Resolved

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:40, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

No action neeeded for now. All copyvios / tagged files are from the same day. Let's wait if the uploader can clarify at least some of it. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:27, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

USER/IP 41.138.78.16

Resolved

Every little edit i submit is blocked by cyborbot/help 41.138.78.16 00:16, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

IP is blocked for Xwiki nonsense. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:24, 18 July 2017 (UTC)


Mosahih

Pending

AVRTM2 (talk) 01:39, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Golf-ben10

Pending

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)


Mohamed maikel

Resolved

Magnus (talk) 13:15, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Blocked by Jdx. Daphne Lantier 16:51, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Mkckim

Resolved

B dash (talk) 14:03, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

 Not done. Only 2 copyvio messages since 2014. No warnings. Last 10 uploads were good. There were some problems in the past, but the user has been considerably better since then. Taivo (talk) 20:42, 19 July 2017 (UTC)


71.218.16.215

Resolved

Ad Orientem (talk) 03:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Blocked 2 weeks (and now with talkpage disabled after continued problems there). DMacks (talk) 04:37, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Буянбилэг

Resolved
The uploader credits himself as the source of the works, which seems doubtful since some look like official government images. The uploader also credits himself as the copyright holder.

Maile66 (talk) 14:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Uploads deleted and user blocked. Daphne Lantier 19:42, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Fouadadanmp3 and sockpuppets

Resolved
✓ Done All uploads deleted, and all socks registered here at Commons are now blocked. Daphne Lantier 01:11, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. Btw, I reported all sp on meta:SRG. --Dэя-Бøяg 01:22, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
... and all of them were globally locked :-) --Dэя-Бøяg 01:31, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
@DerBorg: I've found and blocked a couple more socks with the same uploads:
Sometimes it helps to search the user list, in this case for "Fouad". Daphne Lantier 03:45, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
@Daphne Lantier: Reported on meta:SRG, thanks :-) . For the research, tonite I used to see "fouadadan+something" on CentralAuth, because I supposed that "fouad" was too generic. Wow, nice catch! I'm impressed :-) . --Dэя-Бøяg 14:39, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
PS: I think that this request should be helpful to remove the problem, definitely :-) . --Dэя-Бøяg 14:43, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Uhm... I understood, you mean the User Creation Log? I'll watch. --Dэя-Бøяg 14:55, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
@DerBorg: I was referring to Special:ListUsers. Daphne Lantier 17:06, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
@Daphne Lantier: here's another file to be deleted: File:Fouadadaniiiiii.jpg. Thanks. Jared Preston (talk) 19:31, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Jared. I listed the author of File:Fouadadaniiiiii.jpg. --Dэя-Бøяg 20:59, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Yet another sock, found on enwiki. --Dэя-Бøяg 21:04, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
And the File:Fouadadan510.jpg, of course. OMG, he's unstoppable! He's filling Commons of dozen of pics of him... <joke mode>Shall I upload a "Wanted Poster" of him?</joke mode>. Anyway, talking about my request for title black list (en.wp), shoud be blacklisted here fouad+adan+hamoussin into user namespace? Note: user has the strange habit to categorize his pics in the categories H and G. --Dэя-Бøяg 21:14, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Two others: Anachidi etc logged-in in june and uploaded the File:Anachidifouadadan1.jpg. The second logged-in some hours ago and uploaded this files (File:Fouadadannnnnn.jpg and File:Fouadadan.jpg). PS: glad to see that all the SP reported were globally locked by RadiX. PS: I'm finding him takin' a look in the categories H and G. --Dэя-Бøяg 21:47, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

26 July

Him again, a picture of him again (File:Fouadadang.jpg). Reported on meta:SRG. --Dэя-Бøяg 22:11, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Fouadadan logged in one year ago, I think that his 33 contribs here (all deleted), were in the page User:Fouadadanmusic. Maybe, for this reason, I didn't noticed him tonight. --Dэя-Бøяg 22:30, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
I added other SP, searching on CA with various combinations. reported on SRG. --Dэя-Бøяg 22:51, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Good idea :-) . PS: I report, as an example, the case of "Anachidiislami" (not logged here, reported on meta, of course): originally, I supposed he was unrelated but, seeing CA, I noted that he created the account (on ar.wp), just 2 minutes before Anachidifouadadan (on ar.wp). Per "duck" (confirmed). --Dэя-Бøяg 01:18, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

27 July

He's back. Huh, yes, of course, a pair of pictures: File:Fouadislamicadan.jpg and ‎File:Fouadfouadfouadfouad.jpg. --Dэя-Бøяg 03:54, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Another vandal found. Created some days ago. --Dэя-Бøяg 04:04, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Yet another pair of Fouad, still reported on meta, not yet logged here. He's now trying the experience of childish vandalisms. --Dэя-Бøяg 22:00, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
All locked. RadiX∞ 01:39, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Ren Yifan

✓ Done

Techyan（Talk） 13:45, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Blocked. Hystrix (talk) 14:04, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Fouadadan new sockpuppets

Resolved
And the second vandal. --Dэя-Бøяg 22:30, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Daphne Lantier 22:35, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks :) --Dэя-Бøяg 23:23, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Nateybeats

Resolved
Note: Indef blocked at enwiki. --Dэя-Бøяg 00:32, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Spam uploads nuked, acct blocked. Daphne Lantier 01:18, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. --Dэя-Бøяg 01:22, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Fouadadan's SP (28 July 2017)

Resolved
The other SP (Islamonafouadadan) logged on July 15 (found searching on CA). One picture, deleted one week ago. --Dэя-Бøяg 01:44, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Both blocked/locked. Daphne Lantier 01:46, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. I add Fouadsalimcom too in the list, just to complete it. Still blocked, and now globally. --Dэя-Бøяg 01:57, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Fouadadan's SP (29 July 2017)

Resolved
The second (Fouadadaniiiiiii) was still not logged here. Btw, I requested a global lock. --Dэя-Бøяg 08:14, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
If needed (for an eventual rangeblock), 154.147.163.80 should be him per "duck". The article ar:فؤاد_حموصين_ادان, edited by khouribgamasjid (see history), was created by him. --Dэя-Бøяg 08:38, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Added Islamifitazafouadhamousi (CA), that uploaded File:Fouad1991khouribga.jpg to vandalize ar.wp.
Added another vandal, globally locked. This vandalism was his article on ar.wp. --Dэя-Бøяg 19:13, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Same for this. --Dэя-Бøяg 19:23, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Fouadadan's SP (30 July 2017)

Resolved
✓ Done Daphne Lantier 23:14, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Other SP


Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Vandalism/Archive_9&oldid=253907507"