User talk:Hillopo2018

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Hillopo2018!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 07:58, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Welcome back?

I see you have joined us today and are already commenting on QI nominations without uploading any of your own photographs. That suggests to me that you are already familiar with the process (unusual for a newbie). Do you have any previous accounts here? If so, you should declare them. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 09:08, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, nice to meet you! Thank you also for my motivations to get involved here. To take your question right up front, I think QI is a very interesting platform to evaluate images and give feedback. We humans are a diverse society, each with different impressions, opinions and prior knowledge. It is against the backdrop of this diversity that the subjective evaluation of image files is particularly exciting. The exchange of opinions that is possible on the QI pages is also nice. This is new for me in this context, after all I am just gathering my first experiences on Commons and my commitment is only at the beginning. That's why I haven't uploaded any photo files from my smartphone yet. But that will surely come when I discover a picture that can make an exceptional contribution. Many greetings, your Hillo --Hillopo2018 (talk) 08:42, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

QI

Hello, thank you for your evaluatino to the project Commons:Quality images candidates. But I believe that several similar images can be nominated. For mine, the angle of view changes and the mode (HDR), which explains the four photos offered. Gzen92 ^[discuter] 11:33, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Besides I find that File:Église Saint-Maurice (Ebersmunster) (5).jpg is sharper. Gzen92 ^[discuter] 11:52, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi and thanks for your message! So, I think that one photo of a picture series is enough for the rating. It makes little sense to nominate the quasi same photo several times, if they hardly differ or not at all. I would suggest that the photographer chooses the best picture, i.e. does a pre-selection and then brings the one picture to QI. --Hillopo2018 (talk) 07:22, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

You are looking for com:fpc. --Smial (talk) 15:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Eligibility of QIC reviewers

It seems your participation on QI is somewhat premature, for which I aplogise for not having noticed earlier. Please see COM:QIC#Evaluating_images and wait until 30th July before reviewing any more images. Thanks. Any reviews you feel like making will have to wait otherwise they will be reverted. Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

This should be solved right now. --Hillopo2018 (talk) 07:15, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Discussion at QIC talk page

A discussion is being held here, over the reviewing process at QIC and the possibility of improving our Image Guidelines. As a regular contributor to the project, your opinion would be most welcome and valued. Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:49, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

 Done --Hillopo2018 (talk) 12:56, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

File:At Tenerife 2022 025.jpg

Hi, thanks for the review! I'm just trying to understand what you mean by 'Image has disturbin dark areas on both sides.' Do you mean the trees, or possibly the sea? Would a crop help? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 09:04, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Yes, they shall get cropped away. --Hillopo2018 (talk) 08:39, 2 October 2023 (UTC)