User talk:Kved

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

From stone age to May 2008

Babel user information
This user is an administrator on Wikimedia Commons. (verify)
es-N Este usuario tiene una comprensión nativa del español.
en-3 This user has advanced knowledge of English.
Users by language

re:Image:Rbdmifoto.PNG[edit]

Okay, thank you for the info, I'll try to upload it on the English wikipedia, I wanted to do it in Commons so it could be used in all wikies but I guess I won't be able to do it that way now, BTW, sí hablo español. El bart089 20:53, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Re: Duda de imagen[edit]

Me queda claro todo, estoy inconforme con este sistema, dado que en wikipedia EN, se pueden subir imágenes sin pedir forzosamente una regla de violación, tendremos que adaptarnos Jorghe (X)

Lo sé, pero me gustaría que no fuera así. Jorghe (X)

Thanks[edit]

For the work you are doing here - regards --Herby talk thyme 07:52, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - my refuge from the English one :) I like the people here & love the pictures. If I can help do let me know - despite having some edits on es wp my understanding is very very basic! --Herby talk thyme 18:58, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

All the images I uploaded are licensed under creative commons.--William Saturn (talk) 00:08, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps its not working correctly, because I tried it and it doesn't work even though it states on flickr that it is licensed under creative commons.--William Saturn (talk) 00:27, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay sorry about that. I'll use the tool from now on to upload images from flickr.--William Saturn (talk) 03:58, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading images[edit]

I've never used the flickr tool since, the last time I tried, it wouldn't work. So, I've just uploaded them the other way, using the upload file and then flinfo tool to copy and paste the information. To be honest, I felt insulted at your mentioning it, it made me feel like an idiot for not being able to use that damn tool, and then you reuploaded an image that was perfectly fine to begin with, even if it had a slighter smaller res. So, thanks for the unintended insult, and hopefully the tool will work for me from now on, if I remember to use it. Jonjames1986 (talk) 22:59, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How to use one image you have deleted[edit]

Hi, I have asked the question to someone else but he was not sure about licenec so I ask it again to you: You have deleted one image I had uploaded on Wikipedia

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=delete&page=Image:Ezana_Stela_large.jpg

The resaon was that the image was created from on an image on Flickr with not the right licence.

The original image can be found here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/herr_hartmann/415941451/ with the corresponding licence: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/deed.fr

  • Question 1: I have contacted the author of the picture, and he tells me that:
"You can use the photo on wikipedia, that's ok with me, but I wouldn't want to change the license."

Can you tell me how I can do to use this image then?

Is it sufficient with his written permission? Or should I ask him to modify the licence, if so what modifications should be done?

  • Question 2: There are several images I want to upload from Flickr, can you confirm that images showing the following licence are OK for upload on Wikipedia

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.fr

Regards, Zheim (talk) 23:19, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your very clear answer Kevd, and thank you for the tool too!
Cheers,
Zheim (talk) 07:30, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Subiendo imágenes de Flickr[edit]

Saludos. Muchas gracias por tu recomendación, pero al parecer tengo problemas ya que no corre la herramienta de subido automático de imágenes. Puede que sea el ordenador. NoelZyon

Image:Carnival Liberty-sun deck.jpg[edit]

Why isn't the photo coming up on this page? I can view it here. Goodvac (talk) 19:04, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any other big photo-sharing sites?[edit]

Are there any other big photo-sharing sites that I can take free photos from like Flickr? Goodvac (talk) 19:17, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suerte con la CAB[edit]

Y de paso, ¿dónde puedo avisar si me encuentro fotos con copyright (capturas de vídeos musicales? Avisé a Dodo pero está out. Saludos, Gons (¿Digame?) 11:04, 26 July 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Gracias, me pongo a ello. Gons (¿Digame?) 18:11, 26 July 2008 (UTC).[reply]

How about Photobucket?[edit]

Does Photobucket have free photos? Are any of these photos free? Can you also show me an example of a OpenPhoto image uploaded here? Goodvac (talk) 17:30, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating[edit]

Thanks for taking part in my RFA. It passed 29-5-0, and I appreciate and will take to heart all of the feedback, and do my absolute best to better Commons with the trust placed in me by the community as a whole. rootology (T) 17:15, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment pages[edit]

I see you nominated two images that I received permission from the photographers for for deletion. I do not see a comment page. Where do I comment on these photos (Image:Crown Fountain at night showing dualism while not cascading.jpg and Image:Crown Fountain at night showing dualism.jpg)?--TonyTheTiger (talk) 04:16, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to adminship[edit]

I hereby appoint you as a new administrator. Congratulation and welcome.--Jusjih (talk) 01:22, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good Luck! Good to see you on our team! Regards --Kanonkas(talk) 20:34, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete of Image:Lapd helicopter.jpg[edit]

You say no reason to delete, but I had been told previously that speedy was the right method (and indeed have just had other images deleted by the same method) so apologies if it is not. One is not an edit of the other, I originally uploaded the one I requested delete on and then uploaded a larger reworking of the original RAW file which then became an FP on en:WP. This one is a smaller, blurrier, less color correct version, it is not an edit of the other in any way. My alternative is to upload the new one over the old one and request a delete as duplicate? Mfield (talk) 04:10, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Mfield (talk) 20:52, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Are these worth reviewing? I came across some rather obvious copyvios which suggested the contributions might not be encyclopedic. Hope you don't mind - regards --Herby talk thyme 15:31, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stahlkocher images[edit]

I have restored several images that you have deleted. More details here: Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Attention#Images_of_User:Stahlkocher. My the way that IP belongs to the same range. -- Cecil (talk) 16:33, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stahlkocher images[edit]

Thanks for notifying me. I'll remember to check the page history carefully in future to stop me making this mistake again. Thanks, Anonymous101 talk 04:55, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

pt/Commons issue[edit]

Hi - I wonder if you could take a look at an issue that cross over pt wp & Commons. Here the info is here with some discussion between BrokenSphere & myself here & here. On pt this will get you the info.

Is the page encyclopaedic or more commercial I guess? The help is appreciated. Thanks & regards --Herby talk thyme 06:59, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With apologies - I've been rather busy at present & just reacted instead of thinking. Thanks for the thoughts though. I do agree with them. I tend to treat scope as coming before licensing rather than the other way around (although I know some would disagree). Regards --Herby talk thyme 06:46, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beijing 2008 visual.jpeg[edit]

Since you removed image:Beijing 2008 visual.jpeg, I've created a new visual without any copyviolation. Image:Blackhandcuffflag.svg. Confimr me that you have no problem of copyviolation with this one. It should not be a problem but since you removed the previous I prefer to ask you :p. I ve created this new image to solve the problem of red link to image in french wikipedia:) Dionysostom (talk) 11:20, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Felicidades...[edit]

Al nuevo administrador :) Y mi primera solicitud es para que, por favor, revises esta imagen ya que parece de estudio, aunado a que la licencia no dice mucho, por lo que podría ser un plagio. Quedo de tus comentarios, Un abrazo, --BetoCG – ¿decías? 22:16, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Me parece perfecto. Muchas gracias por tu asistencia. --BetoCG – ¿decías? 01:58, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aha - that place![edit]

Well the main reason I am here is the fact that I find en wp rather strange.... Anyway - there is a deletion request it and I've pointed to it on the admin board (had it not been I would have deleted it I assure you). The page is here so you may well wish to express your opinion I guess! I'll checkout the Meta page next and get back to you if there are any issues. Happy to help any time I can. Cheers --Herby talk thyme 06:56, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

no source tags correct?[edit]

Hello Kved, I just noticed some of the images you recently tagged with {{No source since}} appear to have source and author, as required. For example:

Other images that have been tagged as having no source are listed here. However, each one looks to be properly tagged with a GFDL and declared to be self-made. Do you have a reason to believe that the self-made claims are incorrect? Otherwise I cannot understand the reason for the tags.

Secondly, this image from 1913 was deleted: Image:Parseval PL 18 1913-05-03.jpg. This google cache from 4 August shows it had the {{Anonymous-EU}} public domain tag. This one may be more difficult to judge because it relies on German law treatment of anonymous works published before 1995 in Germany. The source is the Rosebud Archive of aviation photographs. That particular image appears to have been donated by Jean-Pierre Lauwers from his image collection. Its source is here linked from this page. For comparison, Image:1915.01.25 PL25 jpl.jpg is an example from the same collection.

Because the Jean-Pierre Lauwers image is more difficult, and because there are many images from his collection on Commons, I would like to request a deletion review for that deleted image. This will allow more experienced Commons users to decide if it is Ok or not. -Wikibob (talk) 18:25, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick reply and the undeletion of the Parseval airship image. I will now add better sourcing to it.
As to the Eduardotrinchera uploaded images, I now understand why they are tagged and why they are getting deleted. Thanks again.-Wikibob (talk) 20:47, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, about your question of Vera Barclay's picture, please see at: Image:Vera_barclay.JPG

Sincerely, Scouts2012 --Scouts2012 (talk) 14:30, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Seal of New York City.png[edit]

I've reverted you edit to Image:Seal of New York City.png since you entered no proof for the PD status of the image (and aditionally it's under a GFDL license not PD). /Lokal_Profil 15:56, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The source you gave seems to indicate that the current coat of arms is from 1915. Apart from that making it less then 100 years old there is also the distinction between the design of the coat of arms being from 1915 and when this rendition is from. Even if the design is PD-old the newest rendition might still be copyrighted (coat of arms allow for a lot of individuallity in how they are drawn). Without the actual source the age and copyright status is hard to determine. /Lokal_Profil 22:13, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[1] and [2] show different interpretations of the seal and [3] contains the one that NYC considers official. /Lokal_Profil 22:20, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The general problem with coat of arms is that although the en:blason (which defines it) is old enough the copyrightable interpretation might be new. DR might be better to collect all of the info in one place. /Lokal_Profil 23:08, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Seal of New York City.svg now opened. /Lokal_Profil 16:05, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Liftyrskinnyfists.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Liftyrskinnyfists.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Motopark (talk) 19:37, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job[edit]

hello kved thanks for your help with Category:Unknown.so it seems now we don't suffer from a huge backlog.--Mardetanha talk 05:17, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chauchina coa.gif[edit]

Hi, why did you restore this image? It's been OTRS-pending for over a year now. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:24, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Damn old versions not using old versions of templates... Thanks. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:35, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vexilla Hispanica[edit]

Please, review Image:Escudo de Planes.png and Image:Escudo de Bolulla.png. You have restored the text but not the file. And Image:Escudo de LaRomana.png should be restored also. --V.Riullop (talk) 15:46, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias. Lástima que no exista un CommonsRelinker :-( Creo que estos también son de la misma colección: Image:Escudo de Albal.png, Image:Escudo de Alcublas.png, Image:Escudo de Alcácer.png, Image:Escudo de Alfafar.gif, Image:Escudocalpecolor.jpg, Image:Escut d'Alaior.png. --V.Riullop (talk) 10:33, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Imágenes propuestas para borrado[edit]

Kved ¿si puedieras echarme una mano? Quieren borrar varias imágenes que subí de flickr. Se amparan en las leyes griega y egipcia sobre Freedom Panorama. Mi inglés es pésimo. Me echó un mano Filipo diciendo su interpretación de la ley, pero me temo que las borrarán si no argumentamos algo más. Escribí a Alehn en su discusión de Wikipedia, pero aún no me ha contestado. Te agradecería mucho si crees que Filipo y yo llevamos razón y nos apoyas. Muchas gracias. Dorieo (talk) 16:58, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Desgradaciadamente no puedo argumentar si están licenciadas o no por los Gobierno griego o egipcio, que supongo que lo hará a través de sus Ministerios de cultura. Debido a que en los carteles informativos no se se visualiza o no consta dicha información. Otra historia es la Image:Metaxa.jpg, pues como he contestado hay muchas otras imágenes que por el mismo motivo deberían ser borradas (vinos y otras bebidas alcohólicas: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/2008/10/02#Image:Metaxa.jpg. Muchas gracias por todo. Un abrazo. --Dorieo (talk) 10:24, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He ampliado un poco mi argumentación aquí. No sé si valdrá de algo. De todas formas, creo que sí que es lógico pensar que los derechos de autor de un cartel expuesto en un museo, excavación o zona cultural pública pertenecen al gobierno griego (que habrá contratado la creación del cartel). --Filipo (talk) 11:10, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image of Category:Association Jeunesse Auxerroise[edit]

Hello. I don't understand what you have delete the pics of AJ Auxerre stadium and Stade Auxerrois stadium. I want that pics come back please. Xavoun (talk) 20:27, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Saludos...[edit]

Buenas tardes camarada, recién visité el artículo de Albino Luciani y me encontré que la imagen de su funeral fue borrada. Me gustaría saber qué sucedió y así descartar un posible error y en caso de que así fuera poderla rescatar. Un abrazo, BetoCG – ¿decías? 19:38, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User creado para vandalizar[edit]

Hola Kved, pues eso, como puedo reportar un usuario creado para vandalizar: Tempesta. Un saludo, Gons (¿Digame?) 11:35, 24 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Muchas gracias, Gons (¿Digame?) 12:01, 25 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Image:Dorieo and his son.JPG[edit]

Hola, Kved, tengo esta imagen sin categorizar en mi PU , y no sé qué categoría tengo que poner ¿Tú lo sabes? Gracias. Un abrazo. --Dorieo (talk) 16:46, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Muchísimas gracias :D Dorieo (talk) 17:41, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bilbobus[edit]

Hola; veo que se han borrado varias imagenes de esta pagina, y por lo tanto una tabla ha quedado deshecha, pues las lineas de autobus estaban representadas mediante las citadas imagenes, y ahora ya no se ven. ¿Quien rehace eso? Saludos. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arrap (talk • contribs) --KveD (talk) 21:42, 9 November 2008 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

Avril[edit]

Oi,A imagem que eu coloquei o site tem sim todos os direitos autorais,pois se o site tivesse apenas uma autorização das imagens seria apenas temporariamente,não pra sempre e o porque que tiraram a minha foto da minha guitarra!!!--Vitor mazuco (talk) 19:43, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Renombrado[edit]

Hola, la imagen Image:DSCN0535.JPG ,que tengo en seguimiento ha de ser renombrada como Image:Clock tower in Poros.jpg. Ayer vi el aviso, lo he intentado, pero no sé. Te agradecería que me hicieras el favor de cambiarle el nombre. Muchas gracias. Un abrazo. Dorieo (talk) 12:21, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duda sobre licencias[edit]

Hola Kved, me he encontrado en la :es con esta imagen. La explicación que pone para haberla subido es que proviene de 20 minutos, sin embargo fue la agencia EFE la que se la proporcionó al periódico, y dudo que dicha agencia tenga una licencia libre... ¿Es copuright violation? Un saludo, Gons (¿Digame?) 18:25, 6 December 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Zorros_itq_casco.jpg[edit]

Hola Kved, puedes decirme por qué has borrado la imagen del casco de los Zorros del artículo de la ONEFA? Gracias

Más[edit]

Sigo recurriendo a ti... Me encuentro con esta foto en la :es. Tiene una obvia "c" en la esquina superior izquierda. Siguiendo el rastro, la sacaron de este foro, que a su vez la sacó de flickr,y como he visto que a veces se puede importar imágenes de esa página, y no encuentro los términos de licencias de este usuario en concreto, no sé que paso dar a continuación. Saludos, Gons (¿Digame?) 20:09, 26 December 2008 (UTC).[reply]

File:Red pog2.svg[edit]

Hi Kved, you deleted the above image because it was missing licensing information. As I already stated in the deletion request, this is a derivative of a Public Domain image with only a shadow added. This edit is IMHO ineligible for copyright. If you would restore the image, I'd be glad to fill out the licensing information, so it can be kept. Thanks and best regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 17:38, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ayuda[edit]

¿Cómo andás compa? Antes que nada ¡¡Feliz navidad atrasada!! Mirá, necesito me des una ayuda con estas violaciones que ya llevan bastantes días sin atención: Image:Cumbre 3.jpg, Image:Cumbre 2.jpg y Image:Logo de TCS.jpg (esta última es un derivado). De antemano muchas gracias. ¡¡Un abrazo!! --Snakeyes (talk) 02:52, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Por aquí tengo otras más: Image:Escudo esj.gif, Image:Ext 2.jpg, Image:Ext 3.jpg, Image:Perex.jpg, Image:Capilla2.jpg. ¡¡Gracias!! --Snakeyes (talk) 05:38, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Y otra más jijijiji (prometo que es la última): Image:Escudo Liceo.jpg. ¡¡Mil gracias!! --Snakeyes (talk) 05:45, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
¡¡Mil gracias!! --Snakeyes (talk) 20:34, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Kved!! El usuario ha reincidido en el copyvio: File:Escudo esj.gif. Gracias de antemano!! --Snakeyes (talk) 05:21, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Borrado[edit]

Hola, ¿puedes borrarme estas dos fotos?:

[4]

[5]

Gracias.

El pesao de siempre[edit]

Pues más sospechas: File:Grunge is dead.jpg y myspace. Saludos y gracias, Gons (¿Digame?) 18:36, 17 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Otra más: File:Nirvana1 393312a.jpg, es que estoy revisando Nirvana... Gons (¿Digame?) 18:42, 17 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Borrado de imagen[edit]

Hola me borrastes una imagen y quisiera saber ¿por que? ya que el motivo que das de derechos de autor no tiene fundamentos. Quisiera saber como volver a publicarla. Espero la respuesta, gracias. La imagen es: File:El tercer grande del fútbol argentino.jpg. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SebastianVillaboa (talk • contribs)

Translated OTRS-template[edit]

Hello, I've translated the OTRS-template from English to German: English -> German
Can you please add the German version to Template:OTRS pending/lang? -- Best Regards MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 12:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Borrado de imagen[edit]

Hola . Has borrado una imagen , al parecer poruqe no estaba clara lña fuente . El cuadro original es de mi propiedad. Dimee como puedo arreglarlo . la foto original es: Archivo:Pedrocaba2.jpg.

He dejado una respuesta aquí. Saludos. KveD (talk) 00:50, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gram4.jpg[edit]

Hello Kved. Would you be so kind, please, to review http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gram4.jpg ? Thank you very much for your help.

Etiqueta...[edit]

Hola Kved... desconozco mucho de las reglas de este lado de wikimedia, pero creo que esto es un insulto que sí merece una sanción en todos lados, especialmente porque se mete con mi patria y mi terruño. Es un usuario que está bloqueado en w:es y sigue la fiesta aquí... le das una ojeada???... muchas gracias. --User:Netito777 19:41, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pues gracias... tú eres el experto aquí y confío a ciegas en tu excelente criterio. --User:Netito777 23:16, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mapas[edit]

Hola me paso mucho tiempo en la red investigando cosas, y siempre note que no habian mapas del primer y segundo imperios mexicanos, y los que habian, daban pena y me tome la tarea de sacar de un libro las divisiones territoriales de esos imperios y dibujarlas por mi mismo en unos mapas, las he subido a wikipedia y ya las he enlazado, pero como desconozco mucho de las reglas de wikipedia y en general de todo, no se como comprobar que son mias ni enlazar la fuente de donde las saque, que aunque no son una copia de ese libro, si las dibuje respetando lo mas posible las divisiones y a final de cuentas es un trabajo mio, podrias ayudarme a dejar en regla esas imagenes, porque no quiero que despues de tanto tiempo dedicado me las borren, porque quiero compartirlas con todo mundo. mi fuente es DIVISIONES TERRITORIALES DE MEXICO de E. O'GORMAN.muchas gracias. --User:jaimiko 05:00, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, no las tome de encarta si te refieres a copiar y pegar, me base de ellos y de mapa mundi mexicanos, atlas de preparatoria etc etc, tome el sombreado de colinas y rios de encarta, pero si vez detallademante o copias y pegas la imagen del atlas de encarta veras que no coinciden, porque el atlas de encarta suprime muchas islas y partes continentales que yo agregue en photoshop, al final de cuenta estan parecidas porque de alla me base, y porque todos los mapas del mundo son parecidos. pero no las tome de alla. gracias.

pd. te pedi ayuda para que me "ayudaras", no para que solicitaras que borraran mis imagenes. hay alguna manera de contribuir aca en wikipedia sin que te borren todo lo que hagas porque crean que hiciste o copiaste algo, o tengo que hacer mi propia pagina de internet para subir mis mapas??.--User:jaimiko 01:00, 03 Marzo 2009 (UTC)

Que tal[edit]

Que tal, asi de simple se crea otra cuenta, y sigo y sigo las veces que quiera, se bloquea, se crea, se bloquea se crea, digo es tan simple, y tan patético, ya sabes ó como dice Neto777, tu eres "el experto", estubo buena esa respuesta que le dieron a tu compatriota, este log, muy gracioso. --Hambrientino (talk) 20:32, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Y bueno, se te bloqueará las veces que haga falta. Tampoco voy a salir a rasgarme las vestiduras por ello, ni tampoco vas a ser el primer genio al cual se le ocurre eso. KveD (talk) 21:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Based on this block you may wish to review these. Let me know if I can help - regards --Herby talk thyme 14:11, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Puppet accounts[edit]

Commons CU info has been passed on to Drini (& I cannot see any further accounts here at present). Regards --Herby talk thyme 17:35, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lar ha contestado a la petición de checkuser. Saludos. --Dferg (commons-meta) 10:05, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Por cierto, me decantaría por mandar a la hoguera todo esto, salvo alguna subida legal que he visto por ahí el resto son copyvios de seguro. Un saludo. --Dferg (commons-meta) 20:33, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Not sure why but this file was in my watchlist. I assume I've transfered it from the en.wiki where it got from the french one. Could you please give more details on the deletion reasons? "No permission" doesn't seem to fit, since the file has GFDL license. Gracias. --Monfornot (talk) 13:18, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Sulake.png[edit]

Hi, you tagged this file as missing permission, but I believe it's {{PD-textlogo}}, so no permission should be needed. If you're not convinced it's ineligible for copyright, could you make a DR instead? Thanks. –Tryphon☂ 15:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the npd template, but still I'm in doubt about if the logotype (not the text below) can be considered {{PD-textlogo}}. I'm gonna do some research tonight and if I'm still in doubt, I will open a DR. Cheers!. KveD (talk) 21:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. What really makes me think it's not eligible is that it's basically how anyone would draw a cloud schematically; so if it was eligible for copyright, any kid drawing a pretty picture with clouds in the sky would infringe this copyright, which seems absurd. But I'll let you do your research, and open a DR if necessary. –Tryphon☂ 21:45, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes {{PD-textlogo}} should be fine, but apparently the logo is trademarked, so I've added {{Trademarked}} to the image. KveD (talk) 03:34, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Colombianorgulloso[edit]

Hola. Como ya sabes, este usuario y sus títeres tienen un largo historial de copyvios. Esta persona lleva más de un año editando en la wikipedia en español.

Su actual títere, Valentino01 (talk · contribs), ya ha subido varios archivos. Hace más de una semana que le marque varios de esos archivos con la plantilla no source, sin embargo no los han borrado. Colombianorgulloso ya ha provocado que varios artículos de es: sean bloqueados: Cucutá, Economía de Colombia, y Bogotá, este último en tres oportunidades, de las cuales la más reciente fue cortesia tuya. Además, este usuario tiene la costumbre de agregar sus archivos en otras wikipedias, especialmente en la versión en inglés.

Por otra parte, este "checkuser case" tiene un error ya que si bien Zaryaz es un títere de Rubashkyn, estas cuentas no tienen relación con Colombianorgulloso. A proposito ¿por que no borraron los archivos de Rubashkyn?.

Cordial saludo.--83.154.15.84 07:21, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

De Rubashkyn se borraron las imágenes que eran copyvio. Las imágenes que aún permanecen en Commons fueron tomadas de Flickr con licencias compatibles o fueron tomadas con la cámara de un celular Sony Ericksson w800i y no he podido verificar si verdaderamente son copyvio o no. Dado que el usuario subió varias imágenes con licencias correctas desde Flickr, creo que es posible que el usuario también haya subido ciertas imágenes de su autoría. Pero para borrar las imágenes que restan lo mejor sería abrir una consulta de borrado ya que no puedo darles borrado rápido. Ahora revisaré las ediciones de Valentino01 (talk · contribs). Gracias por avisar. Saludos. KveD (talk) 17:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Otro títere: Topollillo06 (talk · contribs). Saludos.--83.154.5.6 13:57, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed & ✓ Done :) --Herby talk thyme 14:20, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Otro títere: Monedita (talk · contribs). Saludos.--83.157.56.4 07:17, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again ✓ Done & thanks --Herby talk thyme 08:36, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vickja[edit]

Hola. El usuario Vickja (talk · contribs) tiene varios archivos de dudosa procedencia en su galería:

Saludos.--88.122.219.57 12:37, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Borré las imágenes y advertí al usuario. Saludos y gracias. KveD (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hola, soy el autor de una de las imágenes que has borrado recientemente de ese usuario, y descubrí el uso indebido de mi imagen hace pocos días. ( http://www.flickr.com/photos/aandres/2675503001/ o http://www.flickr.com/photos/aandres/2669701179/ )
Investigando un poco veo que la foto ha sido subida anteriormente con nombres similares por otros usuarios (y luego borrada). La foto está bajo CC-By-ND-NC, y al parecer hay un interés de que la foto aparezca en articulos de Caracas en español e inglés, no estoy familiarizado en la forma de contribuir fotos a wikimedia y artículos de wikipedia, pero si la comunidad está de acuerdo en ponerla ya saben de donde salió y de quién es.
Si la licencia no es compatible con wikimedia, preferiría no tener que ambiarla si hay otra solución, así al menos uno de estos copyvio puede tenaer final feliz. --Aandres (talk) 14:24, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Archivos de Venezuela[edit]

Estos usuarios han subido varios archivos que podrian ser copyvios.

—Milovzla (talk · contribs):

Subió sus archivos en unos cuantos días. Varias IPs se iban encargando de agregarlos en la Wikipedia en español.

—Ismaelsm (talk · contribs):

Este usuario ha sido expulsado de Wikipedia en español.

—Gas3191 (talk · contribs):

Sospecho que Vickja es un títere de este usuario. Gas3191 se encargo de incluir los archivos de Vickja en varios artículos de la Wikipedia en inglés: [6] [7] [8] [9]

—Archilider (talk · contribs):

Este usuario solamente editó durante dos días en Wikipedia en español y commons. Esta fugacidad podría significar que se trata de un títere.

Saludos.--83.154.11.229 12:44, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Eliminadas esas imágenes y algunas otras más del mismo estilo. Gracias de nuevo. KveD (talk) 21:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Claclin[edit]

Hola. El usuario Claclin (talk · contribs) tiene un amplio historial de copyvios además de varios archivos de dudosa procedencia en su galería:

Saludos.--88.122.220.206 13:17, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done All done. Thank you again and sorry for the delay. KveD (talk) 17:56, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ricardoramirezj[edit]

Ricardoramirezj (talk · contribs) fue expulsado de wikipedia en español. En la wikipedia en inglés, su cuenta está redireccionada a la del usuario Ricardocolombia, quien tiene un historial de copyvios. Algunas imagenes subidas por Ricardocolombia en la wikipedia en inglés, han sido trasladadas a commons:

Al usuario Torax (talk · contribs) le han borrado varios archivos por copyvio. Tiene otros:

Sospecho que estos usuarios son títeres ya que ademas del interes por Cúcuta, también comparten un interes por archivos relacionados con Ubuntu/Kubuntu (Ver pruebas: Torax, Qwerty2, Ricardocolombia)

Adicionalmente, Ricardoramirezj es responsable de esta controvertida autorización que nunca paso por OTRS. Varios artículos de wikipedia y algunas imagenes han sido tomadas de esa fuente. ¿Podrías hacer algo al respecto?.

También está el Kmipcd (talk · contribs), quien subió tres imagenes el 18 de enero. Una ya fue borrada por copyvio y las otras dos no tienen metadata. Otro copyvio (http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=312551). Saludos.--83.154.3.144 11:10, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted the obvious copyvios. But I'm probably going to need some heavy cavalry and perhaps a deletion request for the rest. Thank you, again. KveD (talk) 03:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Entiendo. ¿Podrías hacer algo al respecto de la autorización?.--83.154.8.140 12:50, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Perdón por el inglés, no me había dado cuenta, es la costumbre de responder en inglés cuando estoy en Commons. Con respecto a la autorización estoy viendo qué se puede hacer con ella. Por lo pronto he modificado el cartel del principio. KveD (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amigo29 90[edit]

Amigo29 90 (talk · contribs) fue bloqueado en Commons, tras un historial de copyvios. En la wikipedia en español, una verificación de usuarios demostró que este usuario tenia varios títeres, implicados en violaciones graves y reiteradas de etiqueta. Sin embargo estos títeres han continuado con su actividad y un nuevo títere, Mafe linda (talk · contribs), ha vuelto a insultar a un usuario.

En commons este usuario tiene por lo menos tres títeres: Luismor14 (talk · contribs), Ramone Vicious (talk · contribs), Luisita (talk · contribs). Estos continúan agregando copyvios. Saludos.--91.168.45.65 19:51, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Borradas las imágenes y los usuarios bloqueados para siempre. Adicionalmente, una verificación CU arrojó relación entre los títeres y Pequeñon70. Gracias por avisar. KveD (talk) 03:25, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dadas las graves violaciones de etiqueta de este usuario, sus engaños, sus copyvios, etc, ¿no crees que sería pertinente bloquearlos también en la wikipedia en español?. Mafe linda y sus IPs continuan editando con regularidad. Saludos y gracias por todo. --83.154.8.140 12:50, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Otro títere: Alejito147 (talk · contribs). Saludos.--83.154.8.140 13:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Había bloqueado a un par ayer, pero se me olvidó bloquear al resto en es@wiki. Al único que dejé en observación es a Ramone Vicious (talk · contribs). Y con respecto a Alejito147 (talk · contribs) ¿qué es lo que te lleva a pensar que es un títere?. En Commons prácticamente no tiene contribuciones (excepto una borrada que no dice nada) y en es@wiki a simple vista no le encuentro relación con el patrón de ediciones del resto. Saludos. KveD (talk) 16:30, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Explico mis sospechas sobre Alejito147.

1-Edita los mismos artículos que los títeres:

  • Los relacionados con el narcotráfico y conflicto armado de Colombia.
  • Los de los actores Diego Cadavid y Manolo Cardona.

2-Al igual que Luismor14, tiene en su página de usuario una sección titulada "Asuntos Pendientes".

3-Realiza el mismo tipo de redirecciones que los títeres. [10] [11]

Por otra parte, disculpame, pero no veo que las IPs esten bloqueadas. Saludos.--88.122.65.134 18:19, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

En la wikipedia en español este caso presenta una inconsistecia. En el "registro de bloqueos", los títeres bloqueados tienen como unica explicación el echo de ser "Cuenta títere: de Stefannyvodka". El problema es que el usuario Stefannyvodka no ha sido expulsado. Tal vez lo mejor sería corregir todos los registros de bloqueo y mencionar en ellos que se trata de títeres de Amigo29 90, para que así quede coordinado con el caso de commons donde se indica que son títeres de este usuario. Si no se resuelve esto, es un poco complicado agregar las "plantilla títere" en las diferentes páginas. Adicionalmente sería conveniente reemplazar el resumen del registro de bloqueo de Amigo29 90 y hacer allí clara referencia al motivo por el cual fue bloqueado el usuario. ¿es posible?. Saludos.--91.168.44.21 08:48, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Coloqué que eran títeres de Stefannyvodka, pues es la primera cuenta del grupo de títeres. Desconozco la razón por la cual esta solicitud de checkuser no terminó en la expulsión de Stefannyvodka, pero eso ya está solucionado. Y con respecto a las IPs, si se encuentran realizando alguna edición incorrecta o susceptible de bloqueo, basta con informar en VEC o a mí. Pero no justifica bloquear por largo tiempo una IP si no se encuentra realizando vandalismo obvio. Saludos. KveD (talk) 17:33, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maillots ciclistas[edit]

Hola Kved, ¿puedes echar un vistazo a las contribuciones de este usuario? Gracias, y un saludo, Gons (¿Digame?) 20:05, 22 April 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Gracias a usted caballero, por la promtitud. Gons (¿Digame?) 00:57, 24 April 2009 (UTC).[reply]

You're the lucky es admin choosen randomly[edit]

A blocked user is asking for a native Spanish admin here. Seems to communicate just fine with English but whatever. Thanks. Rocket000 (talk) 00:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking time and helping with this! Cheers, Rocket000 (talk) 03:34, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion[edit]

Hello, I just noticed that you deleted File:GeorgeWCampbell.jpg. May I ask you why? This image shows a man who died in 1848 what makes the picture at least 160 years old. Shouldn't that seriously be enough for at least PD-US? I would ask you to restore the file. Best wishes, --Scooter (talk) 23:15, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Scooter (talk) 23:39, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:RaSten.JPEG[edit]

Hi, you deleted File:RaSten.JPEG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log) - that was on his user page, a school photo, which he has the rights to. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:19, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File::nltsb.jpg[edit]

You deleted file:nltsb.jpg from The NLT Study Bible Wikipedia entry saying it was a derivative work. However, it is a low res image not suitable for any commercial use, I took the image myself, and I see no difference in the use of this picture from, for instance, the picture used at the the entry on the New International Version. --Rfmansfield (talk) 15:44, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're referring to fair use rationales, and such thing it's now allowed in Commons (but it is in en@wiki). Here, you can take a look at our politics, about derivative works and about book covers. Cheers, KveD (talk) 16:58, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bandera de Nules[edit]

Hola Kved, soy nuevo aquí en Wikimedia Commons y no entiendo algunas cosas. Me gustaría que borraras la imagen de la bandera de Nules porque esa no es la verdadera bandera. La información en la que había buscado esa bandera era falsa. Aquí tienes el enlace: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bandera_de_Nules.png

Un favor[edit]

Juan Pablo, he quitado de mi PU de Commons y de Wikipedia la imagen en que estoy con mi hijo: File:Dorieo and his son.JPG. Si buscas imágenes en Google con mi nombre de usuario la 1º y la 3ª que aparecen son la que te indico. Al ser mi hijo menor de edad, no estoy tranquilo. Sé que la plantilla de destruir es {{delete}}, pero como no sé casi inglés ignoro cómo poner el motivo ¿Puedes hacerme el favor de decirme cuál sería la frase en inglés, ponerla tú o borrarla directamente?, si tus atribuciones como admisnitrador te lo permiten, claro. Muchas gracias. Un abrazo. Dorieo (talk) 14:12, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Te estoy muy agradecido ;). Ya me quedo tranquilo. Y gracias también por ofrecerte a borrar otras, pero no tengo más fotos comprometidas. Un fuerte abrazo. Dorieo (talk) 00:58, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Livestrong wristband images[edit]

Hi,

Noticed you just deleted them despite the dispute I posted on the talk pages of those images (File talk:Livestrong wristband.jpg and File talk:Livestrong wristband worn.jpg), did you read those at all? Becaise it seems fairly obvious to me that a word printed on a wristband is no more copyrightable than any of the images tagged as {{PD-textlogo}}. Just checking, sheers. --Sherool (talk) 18:48, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:O Mosquito 5S N10.jpg[edit]

Isto já é provocação. Ouve lá já estas a abusar. Está imagem está no dominio publico porque é que insistes??????

This sounds like a provocation. Look there, now you are abusing. This image is in the public domain why do you insist in delete them?????? Zorglub 19:15, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The image is clearly copyright violation. It's a derivative work and first you tagged the image as {{PD-old}} because "the author died 70 years ago". That's not correct. And then, re uploaded under as "own work". That's not provocation nor abuse. KveD (talk) 19:26, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for contest that but I didn't loaded as "own work" i've made the upload and than change it to {{PD-old}} only beacou-se there are no correct licence to aply. And this is not a derivative work because the author sold the rights to the journal that published the image, them when the magazine goes into the public domain the image is also public domain whether the author is alive or not because it is not the holder of their rights. Zorglub 19:51, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The case of the File:O_Mosquito_5S_N10.jpg[edit]

The Portugal law says that a dissolved magazine and newspaper, enters in public domain after 3 years it's dissolution and in case of defunct is one year. But I have made a mistake and please I am sorry for that. I didn't read completely the law, the article 173 of the authors protections, says that the author retains the author rights. resuming, the name and the structure of the magazine is public domain but the cover, if contains protected material, isn't. and is this the case, for that again I'm sorry for my behavior.

Zorglub

04:34, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Frank Fox[edit]

Hi Kved,

I'm the uploader of the series Italy by Frank Fox and I would like to ask you some information about that series of pictures because I'm really puzzled about their copyright status.

- The author of the pictures is not Frank Fox that is just the author of the text of the book "Italy". The pictures were commissioned by the editor to many artist (some of them signed the picture as you can see even in the deleted file) in order to illustrate the book. Because in the book is not specified the authors of the pictures and the pictures are not reproduction of paintings but just book illustrations, who is, in this case, the owner of the copyright? The painter, the publisher, the editor?

- The book Italy by Frank Fox from were I have extracted the pictures was tagged in archive.org as Not-in-Copyright and, according to the answer to my post in Commons talk:Licensing, thy are PD in USA but may be not in other country as UK. On the other hand, as far as I understood working on Commons, the policy of copyright Commons is following is the american one so, at least in USA, they are in PD (because published before 1923) so why to delete them instead tagging them as PD in USA but not in other countries as discussed in this post ( http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Licensing#PD-Egypt )?

I'm asking you all of that not because I want to criticize your decision (I'm just a white belt in Commons and you are a black one) but because I would like to improve the quality of my work on Commons and to understand properly all those copyright and public domain issues in order to contribute effectively to the project without disturbing users and administrators in discussing and deleting my misappropriate uploading. For example, the discussion about costumes as derivative works or not, really puzzled me about what is a copyviol and what is not (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Images_of_costumes_tagged_as_copyvios_by_AnimeFan ).

Really thank you for your patience and your attention.--Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 09:50, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kved,
thank you very much for your precious help. Next time I will properly fill the description following your examples and all the other tips given to me by the other admin. I'm really sorry to have created all this mess just to save time (and in the end I didn't) in the uploading process. I had good intention but that's not an excuse: the road to hell is paved with good intentions. ::Now I have learned the lesson (I hope). It's a pleasure to collaborate with people like you and, mostly, to learn from. Again: grazie.--Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 16:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wasvoorschrift tr.gif[edit]

Hola Kved, de nuevo recurriendo a tu sabiduría. Dudo mucho que Inditex otorgue licencia CC a sus etiquetas... ¿no? Saludos, Gons (¿Digame?) 11:35, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Estupendo, es obvio que son símbolos ampliamente divulgados. Gracias, Gons (¿Digame?) 07:24, 19 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Borrrado de Commons Delinker[edit]

Hola Juan pablo, el bot ha borrado esta imagen aduciendo que está duplicada, y no es exactamente igual ¿Puedes restaurarla? ¿El bot no avisa de que va a ser borrada? Muchas gracias. --Dorieo (talk) 12:10, 24 May 2009 (UTC) PD: Acabo de percatarme de que quien la ha borrado es Micheletb ¿Puedes explicárselo?[reply]

Muchísimaas gracias ;) Tienes razón que la otra imagen es de mayor calidad, y por de pronto no tengo pensado añadir ni una ni otra a ningún artículo. Un abrazo. Dorieo (talk) 18:03, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anthonio212[edit]

Hola. Anthonio212 (talk · contribs) tiene varios archivos de dudosa procedencia en su galería:

Ha subido sus archivos en la wikipoedia en español e inglés usando las IPs 190.165.52.23 y 190.28.76.89. Sospecho que debe ser un usuario con varios títeres. Saludos.--83.157.56.12 07:34, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

¿Puedes echarle una mano a un usuario?[edit]

Juan Pablo, de nuevo te pido ayuda. Siento recurrir a ti otra vez y darte trabajo. Te adjunto la discusión de PabloGlez y el mensaje que me dejó en la mía. Abrí un hilo en le Café, pero parece que tiene prisa por saber si puede o no subir sus fotos. Muchas gracias. Un abrazo. --Dorieo (talk) 23:29, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pregunta[edit]

Una IP me ha pedido si puedo revisar las contribuciones de Senhor (talk · contribs). Al parecer muchas son copyvios pero no consigo identificarlos plenamente. Kanonkas borró ayer unas cuantas. Cuando tengas tiempo ¿podrías revisarlas?, porque muchas parecen a simple vista que no son trabajo propio. En mi discusión bajo la entrada "Senhor" puedes ver más. Saludos. —df| 16:00, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Álbum de Notabilidades Colombianas[edit]

Español: (missing text)

Hola, Kved.

Como puedes ver en mis más recientes contribuciones, he subido algunas fotos de importantes personajes de Colombia (incluyendo Panamá) y sus vecinos utilizando el Flickr upload bot.

Aquí está el original. Son las versiones digitales de más de 500 fotos de un álbum recopilado por José Joaquín Herrera Pérez y que se encuentra en la BLAA, en Bogotá.

Me preguntaba qué tan viable sería crear una categoría (algo así como Álbum de Notabilidades Colombianas) y en dónde categorizar ésta; ya que considero más cómodo llegar a las fotos si están en una sola categoría.

En resumidas cuentas: ¿Cómo crees que se debería llamar y en donde debería estar categorizada?

Muchisisisímas gracias, ~~×α£đ~~es 21:31, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Watermarks[edit]

Hola Kved, me he encontrado con esta foto, que tiene una (c) como marca de agua, aunque en el enlace a Flickr pone que tiene licencia cc 2.0. ¿Qué se hace en estos casos? ¿la marca de agua invalida la licencia de flickr? Por favor, contéstame en la :es. Saludos, 79.151.175.76 00:57, 7 August 2009 (UTC).¡Anda que sí! Era yo... Gons (¿Digame?) 01:26, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Kved!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 17:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Email[edit]

I just sent you an email. Amsaim (talk) 17:15, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvios[edit]

Cómo estás compadre. Tengo un problemilla que deseo exponerte. Hace unos días encontré a un usuario que había subido varios copyvios de una empresa televisiva salvadoreña. Como puedes ver aquí, estuve comentando el caso con Wsiegmund, pero en un caso en particular, él considera que no se trata de un copyvio ya que a su criterio esta imagen File:Logo de Esmitv.png entra en esta categoría: {{PD-textlogo}}. Yo le expuse que el usuario que subió el logo lo hizo como "trabajo propio" y como supuesto dueño del copyright, liberándolo así bajo el cc-by-sa, algo que es totalmente falso. Esta imagen es propiedad de Telecorporación Salvadoreña y por lo tanto está protegida por derechos de autor. Esto se puede comprobar aquí. El me ha recomendo que presente un DR pero a mi juicio procede el borrado rápido. ¿Qué opinás?. ¡¡Un abrazo!! --Snakeyes (talk) 00:22, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok pues, veré si me animo a abrir una consulta... jejeje, no soy muy experto en commons así que creo debo familiarizarme primero un poco con las consultas. Mil gracias compa, ¡¡Bendiciones y un abrazo!! --Snakeyes (talk) 01:55, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ayudita[edit]

Hola Kved, espero que todo te vaya bien. Querría saber si me podrías ayudar con este caso de aquí. Un poco de background y revisión por parte de un admin estaría bien. Muchas gracias, Dferg (talk) 19:30, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias por tu ayuda. Ciertamente acerca de las alegaciones de uso de títeres no es que pueda hacer mucho, las cuentas puede que sean demasiado antiguas como para obtener datos del checkuser por lo que creo que habrá, en este caso y de persistir, aplicar el "block on behaviour" o el duck test. Gracias de nuevo, un saludo. --Dferg (talk) 17:48, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Darkec.svg[edit]

Dear Administrator Kved

In connection with the following things File:Darkec.svg, You have deletet this file because it is for your opinion Copyright violation.

But the truth is that it was not a photograph, but drawing from the picture, a lot of detail is completely changed ( upward of 50%) and it is not copyright infringement - even under very strict practices of copyright. My question is the following; Is forbidden to draw the picture (the scene) that was publicly released? Where? and when?, and What type of drawings is acceptable for Wikipedia. --Vitek (talk) 10:10, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kved

Now I understand problem about Wikipedia attitude towards derivative work, it is simply question to avoiding the problem, -ok. Now I like to see your opinion, our how you look at this legal problem - I put a new illustration in the article Darko Glavan. Actual photo of this person I was used only for inspiration for my own computer graphic creation ( maybe it was better that I drew this illustation by hand ? - but in essence it is the same thing) - Now this looks like this - [[12]](it's not great art, and is not something like - never seen before), - but You can not say that this is derivative work ? (or you can, but in this case even the Andy Warhol is stolen without permission and copyright - famous Marilyn Monroe).

If you find that even this illustration ist just - 'derivative work' , then delete it - and receive my apologies, then I really do not understand this damned new world.

--Vitek (talk) 21:13, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Delete of Katrice Lee's picture[edit]

WHY???????????? WWWWWWHHHHHHHHYYYYYYY? Kved, why did you delete the photo from Katrice Lee's article. I thought you are an administrator to help, but as I can see You are not helpfull at all. Instead to delete it, you should helpt to find out whit kind of licence I have to put there. I wasn't offered the correct opption, what I cuold choose for the licence form. You must know it is free licence, as the family released the photo to the public, to give information about Katrice.

So what licence do I have to choose in the dropp down menu?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.233.212 (talk • contribs) --by Màñü飆¹5 talk 22:45, 22 March 2010 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

If you are referring to File:Katrice.jpg, an image obtained through Google Images from the BBC website the page stated that the copyright belong to BBC. Therefore, it was deleted. KveD (talk) 23:26, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:W148X.jpg[edit]

Give me an explanation, why did you delete my W148 picture? If I detect "nonsense" in your argument or you don't answer in the next 24 hours I will cause damage to all the articles to which you have contributed.

Are you nuts?

If you are referring to File:W148X.jpg, the file was deleted because it had no license, as the deletion summary clearly states. KveD (talk) 03:06, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete[edit]

Would you please help me deleting this image? It's a copyvio and has a watermark on it. Thanks in advance!! --Snakeyes (talk) 05:04, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MiPrestaShop.jpg[edit]

Hola, Juan Pablo! Has eliminado mi imagen. Pero yo no puedo subirla otra vez de forma correcta. No tengo tiempo para leer tanto. Wikimedia en vez de ayudarme a subir la foto, me obliga leer... leer... leer. Cómo intenta matar todo mi entusiasmo. Tengo trabajo, tengo familia y sólo muy poco para escribir algo para Wikipedia. El imagen es mi propio. De que forma más sencilla y rápida podría subirla de nuevo. ¿Y cómo solucionar este problema "este imagen ya fue eliminada"? ¿Otra vez leer... leer... buscando respuestas? DonDemitri (talk) 16:25, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Duda[edit]

Una pregunta: si alguien me nomina injustamente 3 imágenes para ser borradas, ¿eso constituye una falta? ¿Es posible denunciarlo? Porque si es así, desearía hacerlo.

Espero tu respuesta. Luispihormiguero (talk) 18:23, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Respuestas Platonides (talk) 19:11, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS[edit]

Hola. He mandado un permiso de OTRS, pero no me lo han respondido. ¿A qué podría deberse? Quizá sea importante señalar que no especifiqué la URL de ninguna imagen porque con ese permiso se me autoriza a usar todas la imágenes de un sitio web.

¿Podrías ayudarme? Luispihormiguero (talk) 13:50, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS[edit]

Hi, I'm writing you regarding the following matter: As you probably know, the OTRS team handles emails, in which user confirm the copyright for files they uploaded. We have different queues for different languages and volunteers who reply to them. Unfortunatly our spanish speaking volunteers became inactive a while ago. Now the queue for spanish e-mails is growing and noone is able to handle them in a timely fashion.

Thus: Are you, as a native Spanish speaker, interested in becoming an OTRS member? If yes, you can formaly apply here --DieBuche (talk) 22:14, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:AUSharjah02.jpg[edit]

File:AUSharjah02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 10:51, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning[edit]

Deutsch | Español | Italian

Dear Kved. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you abf «Cabale!» 15:26, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:NetBeansLogo.gif[edit]

Hi, Juan What's your answer to my question on the talk-page of a file recently deleted? And why? If you read it, please delete that page, too. Thank you. -- RE rillke questions? 15:57, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Permission for some pictures[edit]

Hi, Kved! Can you look at the e-mail sent by st_dinkov@abv.bg (me). --Batman tas (talk) 21:24, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Kved. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of your inactivity in the past six months.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at the current inactivity run page within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, OdderBot (talk) 11:07, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Kved. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2013 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you – Kwj2772 (msg) 07:59, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 13:59, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

de-admin[edit]

Hello. Because you failed to made 5 log actions since the start of the last inactivity review, your admin flag was removed. Thank you for your service. Best regards. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:46, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected: 

—LX (talk, contribs) 18:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kved&oldid=233278711"